New Posts For Thread: Backs/Lays 50 ticks minimum valuehttps://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23494598/backslays-50-ticks-minimum-valueI price up matches using current season league form and anything that has a lay price of 50 ticks or more lower than the price i have i lay it, if a team has a back price of 50 ticks or more than the price i have then i back it.Only premiership gampresumably he means 6.50 - 6.00not how i would define it eitherhttps://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23494598/backslays-50-ticks-minimum-value?post_id=419708262#419708262presumably he means 6.50 - 6.00not how i would define it eitherFri, 15 Jan 2010 13:52:03 -0600How are you defining tick here? 50 seems a huge amount.https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23494598/backslays-50-ticks-minimum-value?post_id=419708146#419708146How are you defining tick here? 50 seems a huge amount.Fri, 15 Jan 2010 01:38:54 -0600Liverpool a great bet at odds againsthttps://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23494598/backslays-50-ticks-minimum-value?post_id=419708126#419708126Liverpool a great bet at odds againstThu, 14 Jan 2010 16:41:04 -0600Would you agree that there is still value in backing stoke, with a view to trade later, or this will be more or less the SP?https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23494598/backslays-50-ticks-minimum-value?post_id=419708050#419708050Would you agree that there is still value in backing stoke, with a view to trade later, or this will be more or less the SP?Thu, 14 Jan 2010 11:59:20 -0600I agree that Stoke are prob value at the current price and were massive at 6.0+ but my point was its not a bookie cok up as you said.They know what they are doing when they price up like that. They know what Liverpools true price is and they know whahttps://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23494598/backslays-50-ticks-minimum-value?post_id=419708026#419708026I agree that Stoke are prob value at the current price and were massive at 6.0+ but my point was its not a bookie cok up as you said.They know what they are doing when they price up like that. They know what Liverpools true price is and they know whaThu, 14 Jan 2010 10:07:04 -0600ez im not fooling myself into anything, stoke are nowhere near 6.40 to beat liverpool at home!!!!i know the true price of a stoke victory ;-), like i said i like 50 ticks margin in value to make up for the times im out abit, im getting well over 2https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23494598/backslays-50-ticks-minimum-value?post_id=419708022#419708022ez im not fooling myself into anything, stoke are nowhere near 6.40 to beat liverpool at home!!!!i know the true price of a stoke victory ;-), like i said i like 50 ticks margin in value to make up for the times im out abit, im getting well over 2Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:37:11 -0600buzzer i will trade accordingly, plan is to make money and would be stupid not to take the free money now, but the majority of profit will be the stoke win and the drawhttps://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23494598/backslays-50-ticks-minimum-value?post_id=419708018#419708018buzzer i will trade accordingly, plan is to make money and would be stupid not to take the free money now, but the majority of profit will be the stoke win and the drawThu, 14 Jan 2010 09:32:13 -0600the huge cok up was there clear as day and i spotted it a mile awaylolHave you ever wondered why the layers seem to continue making similar "cok ups" year after year?I agree the Stoke price was and probably still is value but dont fool yourself intohttps://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23494598/backslays-50-ticks-minimum-value?post_id=419708014#419708014the huge cok up was there clear as day and i spotted it a mile awaylolHave you ever wondered why the layers seem to continue making similar "cok ups" year after year?I agree the Stoke price was and probably still is value but dont fool yourself intoThu, 14 Jan 2010 08:55:34 -0600these are all outright lays then?I apologise i thought you were attempting to trade pre game.Would you consider backing Liverpool when they reach your value price then?https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23494598/backslays-50-ticks-minimum-value?post_id=419708010#419708010these are all outright lays then?I apologise i thought you were attempting to trade pre game.Would you consider backing Liverpool when they reach your value price then?Thu, 14 Jan 2010 08:55:20 -0600yes i know that m8, my point is liverpool full strenght are not 1.70 to win away at stoke and stoke are not 6.40 to win at home to liverpoolhttps://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23494598/backslays-50-ticks-minimum-value?post_id=419708006#419708006yes i know that m8, my point is liverpool full strenght are not 1.70 to win away at stoke and stoke are not 6.40 to win at home to liverpoolThu, 14 Jan 2010 08:52:12 -0600