<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: In Running : The Evidence, The Folly</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23494470/in-running-the-evidence-the-folly</link><description>There are many threads on this topic, many from people who have a vested interest in the subject because they are doing very nicely. I have never seen any figures published on the wisdom of playing in this market, so I decided to check it out for mys</description><item><title>Very interesting reading it reminds me of when i read Alfie</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23494470/in-running-the-evidence-the-folly?post_id=557606445#557606445</link><description>Very interesting reading it reminds me of when i read Alfie</description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 23:21:05 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>DeltaThanks for bringing this back. 10 years ? I must admit that I very rarely look at the GF these days so was taken a little by surprise.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23494470/in-running-the-evidence-the-folly?post_id=557602625#557602625</link><description>DeltaThanks for bringing this back. 10 years ? I must admit that I very rarely look at the GF these days so was taken a little by surprise.</description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 07:37:21 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Sandown new</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23494470/in-running-the-evidence-the-folly?post_id=557067065#557067065</link><description>Sandown new</description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2019 09:44:34 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>ttt as I want to re-read this</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23494470/in-running-the-evidence-the-folly?post_id=419706246#419706246</link><description>ttt as I want to re-read this</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:59:47 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>For traders = backers or layers. Didn't mean to imply that backing and laying necessary per se.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23494470/in-running-the-evidence-the-folly?post_id=419705914#419705914</link><description>For traders = backers or layers. Didn't mean to imply that backing and laying necessary per se.</description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 06:11:33 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Another conclusion regarding price sensitivity. If layers can beat those prices by just 2%, then there is a clear and progressive profit for the IR layers up to 8%ros at 20.0 and for layers in the pre-race market the average profit is 5.8% (av 3.5% r</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23494470/in-running-the-evidence-the-folly?post_id=419705910#419705910</link><description>Another conclusion regarding price sensitivity. If layers can beat those prices by just 2%, then there is a clear and progressive profit for the IR layers up to 8%ros at 20.0 and for layers in the pre-race market the average profit is 5.8% (av 3.5% r</description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 06:07:19 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>For those who are interested in these things, and to round off the analysis so far, the results provided by baconand eggs show a) the pre-race market bias is not significant at either 99% or 95% confidence levelsb) the in-running market results show</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23494470/in-running-the-evidence-the-folly?post_id=419705906#419705906</link><description>For those who are interested in these things, and to round off the analysis so far, the results provided by baconand eggs show a) the pre-race market bias is not significant at either 99% or 95% confidence levelsb) the in-running market results show</description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 05:50:34 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>baconandeggsThanks for those figures. I have re-interpreted your figures to aid comparison. From a LAYERS standpoint and expressed as a % of level stakes the IR results show that there is not a straight line progression. As you didnt include under 1</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23494470/in-running-the-evidence-the-folly?post_id=419705902#419705902</link><description>baconandeggsThanks for those figures. I have re-interpreted your figures to aid comparison. From a LAYERS standpoint and expressed as a % of level stakes the IR results show that there is not a straight line progression. As you didnt include under 1</description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:31:52 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Betfair were suspending the markets a few yards before the finishing line on RUK at the last Breeders Cup meeting. Flash steaming will provide as near a level playing field as possible if Betfair could stream the live track feed.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23494470/in-running-the-evidence-the-folly?post_id=419705898#419705898</link><description>Betfair were suspending the markets a few yards before the finishing line on RUK at the last Breeders Cup meeting. Flash steaming will provide as near a level playing field as possible if Betfair could stream the live track feed.</description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:10:36 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Betfair say there's no need for that Clydebank. They are thinking about adding a "you may be betting against people who have indulged in form analysis" warning to the pre-race markets though.P.S. I am not joking.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23494470/in-running-the-evidence-the-folly?post_id=419705894#419705894</link><description>Betfair say there's no need for that Clydebank. They are thinking about adding a "you may be betting against people who have indulged in form analysis" warning to the pre-race markets though.P.S. I am not joking.</description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:57:05 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
