<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Yield</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23475678/yield</link><description>Been betting for 5 months now using my simple system of points for my selections, i.e 1-5 points depending on how much i fancy the bet. After three months im averaging 6pts profit per week and staking on average 38 pts. My yield therefore is 15%.I th</description><item><title>Thanks for the comments guys, appreciatted and also some things to think about.beetle, when i get an hour or two ill try working that out.........having a quick glance i would guess i would be worse off but thats without totting up. I tend to stake m</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23475678/yield?post_id=419299330#419299330</link><description>Thanks for the comments guys, appreciatted and also some things to think about.beetle, when i get an hour or two ill try working that out.........having a quick glance i would guess i would be worse off but thats without totting up. I tend to stake m</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 11:41:57 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>A bad system cannot be cured by good staking. A good system can be ruined by bad staking.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23475678/yield?post_id=419299146#419299146</link><description>A bad system cannot be cured by good staking. A good system can be ruined by bad staking.</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 05:15:54 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>fair enough ..perhaps Confucius would have said..The amount you stake is not as important as why you are staking it !</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23475678/yield?post_id=419299142#419299142</link><description>fair enough ..perhaps Confucius would have said..The amount you stake is not as important as why you are staking it !</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 03:52:16 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>i agree with that fatal, but not with staking is unimportant.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23475678/yield?post_id=419299138#419299138</link><description>i agree with that fatal, but not with staking is unimportant.</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 03:42:10 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>The amount you stake is not important, its the maths the matters..In that if your maths ( theoretically ) is not sound - it aint gunna matter what you stake , you'll lose it.Not trying to be Confucius , just making a simple point really.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23475678/yield?post_id=419299134#419299134</link><description>The amount you stake is not important, its the maths the matters..In that if your maths ( theoretically ) is not sound - it aint gunna matter what you stake , you'll lose it.Not trying to be Confucius , just making a simple point really.</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 03:10:57 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>JimmyAs you have been keeping records, what would have happened if you had applied your points system according to odds instead of how much you fancied the selection. i.e. placing the hightest stake on the longest odds and visa versa.Just interested</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23475678/yield?post_id=419299130#419299130</link><description>JimmyAs you have been keeping records, what would have happened if you had applied your points system according to odds instead of how much you fancied the selection. i.e. placing the hightest stake on the longest odds and visa versa.Just interested</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:32:53 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Your "yield" is effectively approx.800 % pa.Yes I would agree that's fairly decent.Give us a break.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23475678/yield?post_id=419299126#419299126</link><description>Your "yield" is effectively approx.800 % pa.Yes I would agree that's fairly decent.Give us a break.</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:31:54 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>The amount you stake is not important, its the maths the matters..of course the amount he stakes is important</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23475678/yield?post_id=419299122#419299122</link><description>The amount you stake is not important, its the maths the matters..of course the amount he stakes is important</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:24:40 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>You remind me of me when i started, I always go for level stake betting if I feel I may be onto something though. It doesnt matter what the odds are and base stake size on it as over the course of a large number of bets your ROI will probably be with</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23475678/yield?post_id=419299110#419299110</link><description>You remind me of me when i started, I always go for level stake betting if I feel I may be onto something though. It doesnt matter what the odds are and base stake size on it as over the course of a large number of bets your ROI will probably be with</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:30:34 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>No doubting discipline is absolutely critical ( and tough !! )I make your info 15.8% ROI which is very good, and if you can maintain it over the "long term' whilst avoiding the dreaded losing streaks, then you are indeed onto something.The amount</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23475678/yield?post_id=419299106#419299106</link><description>No doubting discipline is absolutely critical ( and tough !! )I make your info 15.8% ROI which is very good, and if you can maintain it over the "long term' whilst avoiding the dreaded losing streaks, then you are indeed onto something.The amount</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:25:45 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
