<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Nice to be back after my BAN</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23475394/nice-to-be-back-after-my-ban</link><description>I have had a few months off due to the forum police banning me. The error of my ways was to mention a bookmaker contact who should be emailed if you are getting restricted. Now 99.9% of people read this as an intentional kick in the proverbials for t</description><item><title>99.9% + 0.9%. No arb there.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23475394/nice-to-be-back-after-my-ban?post_id=419294366#419294366</link><description>99.9% + 0.9%. No arb there.</description><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 06:23:15 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Doh!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23475394/nice-to-be-back-after-my-ban?post_id=419294354#419294354</link><description>Doh!</description><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 05:59:12 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>tell us again what you said word for word.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23475394/nice-to-be-back-after-my-ban?post_id=419294346#419294346</link><description>tell us again what you said word for word.</description><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 05:58:32 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I have had a few months off due to the forum police banning me. The error of my ways was to mention a bookmaker contact who should be emailed if you are getting restricted. Now 99.9% of people read this as an intentional kick in the proverbials for t</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23475394/nice-to-be-back-after-my-ban?post_id=419294342#419294342</link><description>I have had a few months off due to the forum police banning me. The error of my ways was to mention a bookmaker contact who should be emailed if you are getting restricted. Now 99.9% of people read this as an intentional kick in the proverbials for t</description><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 05:56:15 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
