<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Does anyone bet prices rather than fancies ?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23469510/does-anyone-bet-prices-rather-than-fancies</link><description>For instance this evening Fulham are 11/10 with the books, around 2.20 before comm on here, close enough to be about right IMO.If Fulham drifted to, say 2.45 for no apparent reason, would you back them purely for the price ?</description><item><title>I asked whether anyone backed ''prices'' or ''fancies'' but like most threads, after a few posts, it goes off on a tangent. Never mind, I'll leave them to it.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23469510/does-anyone-bet-prices-rather-than-fancies?post_id=419157950#419157950</link><description>I asked whether anyone backed ''prices'' or ''fancies'' but like most threads, after a few posts, it goes off on a tangent. Never mind, I'll leave them to it.</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:08:46 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Hhhmmm,Im not quite sure what to make of this thread to be honest.Whats the "core" of the discussion here again?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23469510/does-anyone-bet-prices-rather-than-fancies?post_id=419157874#419157874</link><description>Hhhmmm,Im not quite sure what to make of this thread to be honest.Whats the "core" of the discussion here again?</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:36:18 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Zealot,I'm not sure whether you're being sacastic and I'm aout to get an earful for being a smug tw@t- but in case I'm not-I started off as a bonus **/arber, so I had a decent bank for that. In the process of getting all those bets on I started to th</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23469510/does-anyone-bet-prices-rather-than-fancies?post_id=419157866#419157866</link><description>Zealot,I'm not sure whether you're being sacastic and I'm aout to get an earful for being a smug tw@t- but in case I'm not-I started off as a bonus **/arber, so I had a decent bank for that. In the process of getting all those bets on I started to th</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:02:55 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>robot --you are a legend mate .how big was your bank to start with , robot ?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23469510/does-anyone-bet-prices-rather-than-fancies?post_id=419157862#419157862</link><description>robot --you are a legend mate .how big was your bank to start with , robot ?</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:46:41 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>even value is about opinionsThat's not quite right- Altough you can't acurately determine the value of an individual bet you can retrospectively asess the average value of a set of bets. on that basis you can make a probabilistic assumption about the</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23469510/does-anyone-bet-prices-rather-than-fancies?post_id=419157858#419157858</link><description>even value is about opinionsThat's not quite right- Altough you can't acurately determine the value of an individual bet you can retrospectively asess the average value of a set of bets. on that basis you can make a probabilistic assumption about the</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:45:28 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>even value is about opinions , there's no pre-race matrix table you can look up to see who had value and who didn't , consequently whether something is value is an opinion the same as the opinion as to why you've chosen that selection in the first pl</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23469510/does-anyone-bet-prices-rather-than-fancies?post_id=419157854#419157854</link><description>even value is about opinions , there's no pre-race matrix table you can look up to see who had value and who didn't , consequently whether something is value is an opinion the same as the opinion as to why you've chosen that selection in the first pl</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:35:14 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>For instance this evening Fulham are 11/10 with the books, around 2.20 before comm on here, close enough to be about right IMO.If Fulham drifted to, say 2.45 for no apparent reason, would you back them purely for the price ?Yes- The first winning str</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23469510/does-anyone-bet-prices-rather-than-fancies?post_id=419157850#419157850</link><description>For instance this evening Fulham are 11/10 with the books, around 2.20 before comm on here, close enough to be about right IMO.If Fulham drifted to, say 2.45 for no apparent reason, would you back them purely for the price ?Yes- The first winning str</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:06:18 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>anything that bookies are priced up over betafair get steamed in.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23469510/does-anyone-bet-prices-rather-than-fancies?post_id=419157846#419157846</link><description>anything that bookies are priced up over betafair get steamed in.</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:56:32 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>correction re the overs in the fulham game, i was slightly out in what i said but got 2.32i've always thought there was a little bit of of value in the unders market just through the number of people who like backing overs but noticed unders came in</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23469510/does-anyone-bet-prices-rather-than-fancies?post_id=419157826#419157826</link><description>correction re the overs in the fulham game, i was slightly out in what i said but got 2.32i've always thought there was a little bit of of value in the unders market just through the number of people who like backing overs but noticed unders came in</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:00:06 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I don't remember seeing any significant move for Gillingham, but did note..Rochdale 2.80Wycombe 3.20Norwich 1.55Cheltenham 3.20Colchester 1.52Charlton 1.66Some in, some out.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23469510/does-anyone-bet-prices-rather-than-fancies?post_id=419157694#419157694</link><description>I don't remember seeing any significant move for Gillingham, but did note..Rochdale 2.80Wycombe 3.20Norwich 1.55Cheltenham 3.20Colchester 1.52Charlton 1.66Some in, some out.</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:25:30 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
