<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: question for stats boys</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23468810/question-for-stats-boys</link><description>Hypotheticaly, If I backed every dog at one particular track that was 3/1 and in the same race laid every dog that was 6/1, I could expect roughly that my backs would win 25% of their races and my lays just over 14% of theirs. right ?Now suppose tha</description><item><title>aye robot,Many thanks for your most helpful thread.I can confirm that the win/loss ratio is 65/35 and that it is indeed based on actual figures not backtesting and also that is all based on betfair prices, over a 2000 race.sample.Would'nt use a staki</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23468810/question-for-stats-boys?post_id=419142730#419142730</link><description>aye robot,Many thanks for your most helpful thread.I can confirm that the win/loss ratio is 65/35 and that it is indeed based on actual figures not backtesting and also that is all based on betfair prices, over a 2000 race.sample.Would'nt use a staki</description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:10:59 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>good thread, wise words from the 'robot' again !...</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23468810/question-for-stats-boys?post_id=419142678#419142678</link><description>good thread, wise words from the 'robot' again !...</description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:49:13 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>"if I have achieved 87% more winners than losers, there must be some element at work other than just the prices"Sorry to be equivocal, but it depends....To start with your terminology is a bit odd- when you say "I have 87% more winners than losers" I</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23468810/question-for-stats-boys?post_id=419142642#419142642</link><description>"if I have achieved 87% more winners than losers, there must be some element at work other than just the prices"Sorry to be equivocal, but it depends....To start with your terminology is a bit odd- when you say "I have 87% more winners than losers" I</description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 11:14:07 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>must punters good punters and i meam very good punters .... can only make 10% of turnover ..Very, very few people make 10%, more like 2% to 5% I assure you.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23468810/question-for-stats-boys?post_id=419142638#419142638</link><description>must punters good punters and i meam very good punters .... can only make 10% of turnover ..Very, very few people make 10%, more like 2% to 5% I assure you.</description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 10:22:36 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Hummingsox ....... lets take your 3 or 4 %... so evens win 46% .. 2/1 win 29% 7/2 win 18% and heres the real killer 12/1 win 4% ......... By the way 4% of a million is &Acirc;&pound;40.000..... must</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23468810/question-for-stats-boys?post_id=419142634#419142634</link><description>Hummingsox ....... lets take your 3 or 4 %... so evens win 46% .. 2/1 win 29% 7/2 win 18% and heres the real killer 12/1 win 4% ......... By the way 4% of a million is &Acirc;&pound;40.000..... must</description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:57:11 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>As there are more factors creating the sp than the draw adv.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23468810/question-for-stats-boys?post_id=419142630#419142630</link><description>As there are more factors creating the sp than the draw adv.</description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:44:19 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>It would depend on which sp you use to calculate your % .</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23468810/question-for-stats-boys?post_id=419142626#419142626</link><description>It would depend on which sp you use to calculate your % .</description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:33:10 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Hi Zip,I cant argue with you on that, they are just ballpark figures, something to use for comparison purposes etc, though I think they are probably within 3 or 4% over a LONG period.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23468810/question-for-stats-boys?post_id=419142622#419142622</link><description>Hi Zip,I cant argue with you on that, they are just ballpark figures, something to use for comparison purposes etc, though I think they are probably within 3 or 4% over a LONG period.</description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:32:56 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Heres my take on odds .. give you four ...... evens 50%...... 2/1 33% 7/2 22% 12/1 8 % thats in theory .. over a long time they all return much less than theory ... EG evens dont win 50% o</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23468810/question-for-stats-boys?post_id=419142618#419142618</link><description>Heres my take on odds .. give you four ...... evens 50%...... 2/1 33% 7/2 22% 12/1 8 % thats in theory .. over a long time they all return much less than theory ... EG evens dont win 50% o</description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:21:16 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>aye robot, thanks for that.would you just confirm then in that case, that based on the figures in my first post if I have achieved 87% more winners than losers, there must be some element at work other than just the prices.And would you make the as</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23468810/question-for-stats-boys?post_id=419142614#419142614</link><description>aye robot, thanks for that.would you just confirm then in that case, that based on the figures in my first post if I have achieved 87% more winners than losers, there must be some element at work other than just the prices.And would you make the as</description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:07:48 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
