Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
06 Feb 22 19:20
Date Joined: 31 Dec 04
| Topic/replies: 13,452 | Blogger: ImSoLuckyLucky!'s blog
Pause Switch to Standard View Bournemouth vs Boreham
Show More
Report morpteh mackem February 6, 2022 7:22 PM GMT
bournemouth to stewards room  please.
Report roggrain February 6, 2022 7:45 PM GMT
Commentator keeps saying he's been asked to apologise for any 'industrial' language we may have heard,

but he hasn't apologised. Also the use of the word industrial is classist in my view. He is suggesting

that only working class people swear! F.F.Sake!
Report Slicer February 6, 2022 7:49 PM GMT
If I was a betting man, I put my house on 1.01 the language is coming from the Wood supporters!
Report Slicer February 6, 2022 7:57 PM GMT
Wood leading 1-0 & 100-2 on the language
Report ImSoLuckyLucky! February 6, 2022 8:00 PM GMT
Another apology
For the dire footy
Report sofaking February 6, 2022 8:14 PM GMT
0-1 FT.
Report ImSoLuckyLucky! February 6, 2022 8:24 PM GMT
900 av attendance
Rolled by sugar daddy
Report Slicer February 6, 2022 8:32 PM GMT
The owner is an owner any club would be proud to have. Takes nothing out of the club. Has built it up slowly with no false promises. Ensured the club is economically sound & is loved by the fans. Compare to the owners of neighbouring clubs Stevenage & Barnet. I know about the National League & League 2.
Report sparrow February 6, 2022 8:39 PM GMT
Its good when a man like this gets his just reward for all his efforts for the club and the fans.
Report lybertyne February 6, 2022 8:44 PM GMT
Not bad for a team with ricketts.
Report Slicer February 6, 2022 8:47 PM GMT
Agreed Mr Sparrow. A win away to a Championship club & a tie at Everton will fill the club's coffers!
Report snowynoon February 6, 2022 9:55 PM GMT
well done Boreham Wood ,they and Kidderminster have done non league football proud this weekend .
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.


Instance ID: 13539