Football
thoughts?
Apr 26, 2016 -- 9:13PM, pauliow wrote:
Famous last words I know, but I cant see City scoring
An understatement - Citeh pay £000s per week for mediocre puddings.
Aguerro living off his QPR winner for example
I've been reading a Screwfix catalogue since the 12th minute.
Apr 26, 2016 -- 9:19PM, bigH wrote:
0-0 is an OK result for City
This is true in a vacuum. But you really feel they're never going to get a better opportunity than this.
Apr 26, 2016 -- 9:20PM, DirkDiggler wrote:
Apparently Modric hitting it 20 yards over the bar constitutes an opportunity...
It's an improvement over the rest of the stuff he has done tonight. Can't remember a single pass forward, only going sideways/backwards instead.
David Batty-esque.
Busted his fictional bank yet again!
Apr 26, 2016 -- 7:35PM, Rob_The_Bantam wrote:
Invested heavily on the draw in this at 3.55 and downwards.
will be more open in second leg
City will definitely score
tomorrows game will be far better, really excited for it
Apr 26, 2016 -- 9:39PM, mega88 wrote:
Scratched bet thank God awful game piled in on the draw on 70mins for small profit. Onwards an upwards we go
always winning, must be so hard to be a top pro like yourself mega.
Apr 26, 2016 -- 6:56PM, YOMOMMA wrote:
Apr 26, 2016 -- 6:55PM, wolf3011 wrote:Anything saying free money is a car crash waiting to happenI am a top pro.Ramos to be booked and vazquez to score. Remember this at the end of the game.
Well done, neither your booking, goal scorer or city bet came in... takes some doing
Just keep on laughing, as he's clearly not betting.
No way will they sit back in front of their own fans at the Bernebau, they wouldn't allow or accept it, City will either be battered or have a cunning plan to anticipate this and play counter attack, which with De Bruyne and Sterling on the wings could work well.
Apr 26, 2016 -- 9:30PM, wisewords wrote:
this is the best I've seen Real defend in a long time
They had nothing to defend
Apr 26, 2016 -- 9:53PM, Westender wrote:
Apr 26, 2016 -- 9:30PM, wisewords wrote:this is the best I've seen Real defend in a long timeThey had nothing to defend
Apr 26, 2016 -- 9:49PM, n88uk wrote:
Real Madrid might have parked the bus, but they still had the better chances.
What?
This was the equivalent of a boxing match where the bell sounds and both fighters find their arris's superglued to the corner apron
Apr 26, 2016 -- 9:52PM, ffaith wrote:
No wonder Leicester are winning the PL if City are the best that English football can offer.
Their not, Leicester City are the best, that English football can offer.
Apr 26, 2016 -- 12:53PM, fife wrote:
Why do idiots on the football forum use expressions like mugs to describe top European teams.
That was a top European team?
26 Apr 16 19:35
Invested heavily on the draw in this at 3.55 and downwards. Not a bad result for either side and the price is just a little too big for me.
I believe that the done thing after providing a legendary tip is to quote it along with a
smiley to accentuate how amazing one is.
why do these clowns expect? it's a CL semifinal 1st leg FFS
City obviously would like to get a 1st leg lead, but just as importantly they don't want to concede an away goal or lose, effectively making the second leg a dead rubber
Apr 26, 2016 -- 10:15PM, Rob_The_Bantam wrote:
Rob_The_Bantam26 Apr 16 19:35Invested heavily on the draw in this at 3.55 and downwards. Not a bad result for either side and the price is just a little too big for me.I believe that the done thing after providing a legendary tip is to quote it along with a smiley to accentuate how amazing one is.
Name 6 clubs better than Madrid other than Barcelona, Atletico and Bayern? You can't hence they are a fine team. City are a tough proposition at home but will ultimately get knocked out over 2 legs, yet posters like you call every club a mug unless it wins 6-0
Apr 26, 2016 -- 9:57PM, Westender wrote:
Apr 26, 2016 -- 9:49PM, n88uk wrote:Real Madrid might have parked the bus, but they still had the better chances.What?This was the equivalent of a boxing match where the bell sounds and both fighters find their arris's superglued to the corner apron
Real Madrid missed at least 2 great chances from corners.
What did Man City create exactly? Nothing. So if Real Madrid were parking the bus, what were Man City doing?
Apr 26, 2016 -- 10:06PM, JC1326 wrote:
Apr 26, 2016 -- 12:53PM, fife wrote:Why do idiots on the football forum use expressions like mugs to describe top European teams.That was a top European team?
yeah it was
In a vacuum 0-0 isn't a bad result, but it's still hard to see Man City getting through with this result, and they had a chance to win tonight. This was a big chance for Man City to show what they've got in Europe, and they showed nothing really.
why do these clowns expect? it's a CL semifinal 1st leg FFS
City obviously would like to get a 1st leg lead, but just as importantly they don't want to concede an away goal or lose, effectively making the second leg a dead rubber
You must have been balls deep on 0-0, then?
Sterling, De Bruyne, Silva, Aguerro done nothing all season except against poor sides - in fact the whole team are a pile of shyte.
If Sterling, Navas and the likes of Walcott were of average pace, would they make it into a Conference team?
Apr 26, 2016 -- 11:10PM, Westender wrote:
The £50m sub on £250k per week is the worst of a shyte side who only perform when playing poor sides.Sterling, De Bruyne, Silva, Aguerro done nothing all season except against poor sides - in fact the whole team are a pile of shyte.
You know fook all about City, and if you don't know why Navas was changed for Sterling you might as well give up watching the game.
"If Sterling, Navas and the likes of Walcott were of average pace, would they make it into a Conference team?"
they aren't average pace so what's your point?
Apr 26, 2016 -- 11:10PM, Westender wrote:
The £50m sub on £250k per week is the worst of a shyte side who only perform when playing poor sides.Sterling, De Bruyne, Silva, Aguerro done nothing all season except against poor sides - in fact the whole team are a pile of shyte.
Couldn't have said it any better myself Westy
Muga88
What you lot on about! City been gash all season, silva been missing for over a year, augero hit and miss, say no more.
Backing Madrid HEAVY Ronnie or no Ronnie odds 3 for Madrid geting everything I can on that.
Benzy 2 bale 2 roddy 1.
Apr 27, 2016 -- 1:26AM, themover wrote:
Apr 26, 2016 -- 11:10PM, Westender wrote:The £50m sub on £250k per week is the worst of a shyte side who only perform when playing poor sides.Sterling, De Bruyne, Silva, Aguerro done nothing all season except against poor sides - in fact the whole team are a pile of shyte.You know fook all about City, and if you don't know why Navas was changed for Sterling you might as well give up watching the game."If Sterling, Navas and the likes of Walcott were of average pace, would they make it into a Conference team?"they aren't average pace so what's your point?
Navas and Sterling both cheeks of the same arris - no idea why one pudding replacing another is going to change the game.
That performance last night was one of many this season where Citeh have been utter tripe.
Real came for a draw and had the easiest night for years.
Even Las Palmas and Rayo give them a more difficult game and their squads cost next to nothing.
everybody thought a 0-0 away was a great result so there were lots of nothing games which were boring for fans.
now 0-0 away is considered a good result for the home team and a bad result for the away team as there were no away goals.
I was just wondering if people thought that their other attributes were of a sufficient standard or that their searing pace papered over the cracks in their game. An internet discussion forum seemed like an appropriate place to discuss it.
