Dec 29, 2012 -- 7:24AM, AndrewMat wrote:
It is not your choices or odds, Milan, but one should never - never - go all in. No matter what the chances are or how assured you are. You will simply lose all your bank sooner rather than later - something that already happened to you several times, I assume.
yep, youre right.. happened to me city vs reading 2 weekes ago had gained x5 bank only to go bust
Dec 29, 2012 -- 7:35AM, Beaniash wrote:
DO WE THINK UNDERS WILL HIT?? ... PERSONALLY I DONT. I THINK SPURS WILL PUMMEL THE SUNDERLAND GOAL 2ND HALF.
IF YOU STILL HAD UNDERS I DID WARN YOU
Dec 29, 2012 -- 7:56AM, Swum wrote:
Money matched on people backing/laying Sunderland:1.86 £5,9521.87 £16,8051.88 £5,0421.89 £9,9601.90 £15,4421.91 £117,2791.92 £171,9391.93 £113,920
Dec 29, 2012 -- 8:00AM, Flash1966 wrote:
thats why its best to bet on live games, much easier to deduce what is going to happen
I usually only bet on games I can watch unless I'm just going for a straight win from the start.
Dec 29, 2012 -- 8:08AM, Swum wrote:
Backed over 3.5 now
I think Tottenham will hit Sunderland on the break near the end, so i'll wait until about 80 mins and back 3.5!
Dec 29, 2012 -- 8:39AM, Beaniash wrote:
WHY IS SCOTT PARKER BECOMING A BIT PART PLAYER NOW IS HE STILL NOT 100%
Only coming v=back from injury and Sandro can't be dropped.