Football
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 264 comments are related to the topic:
Crawley V Stoke - Am I reading this right?
Crawley V Stoke - Am I reading this right?
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 264
|
By:
trade time
|
|
By:
Steve Evans seems to have a very limited vocabulary
 |
|
By:
well done to all you stoke backers !!!
like i said earlier its not very often that you see/get these "just basically" wrong odds !!! i hope you all duly filled your boots :) |
|
By:
hmm, i know i should trade, but I am so tempted not to!
|
|
By:
ive traded 1/3 off , think stoke will keep this and odds will fall alot more
|
|
By:
TrickyTrees are you taking the piss? The odds were way higher than 2.2! Crawley have outplayed Stoke and some non-pen put them ahead. You are kidding yourself if you think that was good odds/good betting
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
^^^ are u real ???? 2.26 pre ko was b loody massive value on stoke !!!
what planet u from ?? |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Just shows the pathetic standard of refereeing. That challenge from Shotton was much worse than the one Delap got sent off for!
|
|
By:
i really dont care how the result is achieved ?? the main aim is to get comfortably green and to spot false/wrong prices !!!
i personally have achieved both :) |
|
By:
Erm I don't know how to get the graph up to see what Stoke were matched at but I saw at least 8's on ht and 4 on ft so no Stoke 2.2 was a sh1t bet.
|
|
By:
and the sending-off was !!??? NOT
|
|
By:
the odds on stoke were big, anything that happens in the game after that is just how it is, and the skill is down to trading.
just because stoke havent been so much in the game doesnt change the fact that the pre-match odds were big |
|
By:
|
|
By:
EVANS and PULLIS fighting in the tunnel ??
|
|
By:
Sending off did not change much...Crawley were better before the sending off and after...
|
|
By:
I would take being lucky everyday ty
|
|
By:
Forest000 trade if I was you. You know how unpredictable football is. Bank a profit by greening up. You know it makes sense.
 |
|
By:
As I said awful value and if you had used your "500" bet to lay stoke HT then back them you would be far richer and 2 years younger
|
|
By:
well said FOREST , exactly the point i trying to make !!!
|
|
By:
wd all stoke backers lucky or not
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
loadedgimp : if only we could see in the future ????
ive got a lovely green book now , so my job is done !!! is yours ??? |
|
By:
You can take being lucky everyday Tricky, I laid Stoke HT and backed them after the sending off so no qualms here, I just don't think you had 500 quid to chuck on Stoke if you bet like that.
|
|
By:
cheers iamhewho
some bitter people on here !???!! |
|
By:
I am with forest here have some faith down to 10 men not traded yet will wait until the second half about 10 mins in.
|
|
By:
Crawley are the better side?
The result will be decided by goals and Stoke's players are much more likely to convert chances than Crawley's. |
|
By:
bigmo, you have nearly convinced me :D
i can trade for £2.32 profit. Before that I was looking at £5 profit/£13.75 liability trickytrees, most people here dont understand even basic odds, let alone value. They think they do, which is where the 'mugginess' comes in |
|
By:
i cant see crawley scoring 2, and I couldnt prematch either. I think the sending off makes 2 goals even less likely
|
|
By:
Green up and move on.
|
|
By:
gimp:what are you on about ??
you dont know me , you dont know how i bet ??? like i said on my very 1st post stoke (premier league team) were in my mind fantastic value at 2.26 and at that price i duly put a monkey on it !!! with the view to trade if need be !!! so ive been lucky ??? i just dont understand the point you are trying to make ?? and for that reason im out !!!  |
|
By:
"for me 2012 it's a red card....."
no it fecking isn't! make a case for giving our game back! comms are jus as bad as the refs |
|
By:
I can't back Stoke, regardless of price (did get them once 19/1 Stoke HT against Gillingham when a goal down)
dan_411 my bad if you were referring to Crouch, but Stoke as giants? It's not pretty football and I would rather hold out for a better price if at all. And they thought 2 was a good price It looks like a 50/50 to me, and you guys are taking the shorter odds. TRICKYTREES • February 19, 2012 12:21 PM GMT 5.1 stoke jesus i might have to go in again !!!! We arent bitter, I just try to help people on the forum. Trying to help you see your error otherwise you may lose your bank on a similar bet. Forest you can bang on about value but how is 2.2 value when Stoke were above 5's? |
|
By:
when were stoke above 5's?
|
|
By:
I only try to help, don't mean any harm. Glad it came in for you mate!
Dunno Forest thats what Tricky said. |
|
By:
gimp-really mate you made some very poor comments here. but good luck with ur bet. i actually think this will be a draw here now. but i am out of this game, just still dont like it.
|
|
By:
hmmm yeah Ary's roses are playing this afternoon should be easy money
|
|
By:
he means after the sending off !!!! ha ha ha
like i said earlier we cant see into the future , can you ?? |