Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 264 comments are related to the topic:
Crawley V Stoke - Am I reading this right?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 5 of 7  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 264
By:
Dmack23
When: 19 Feb 12 12:47
trade time
By:
NobbyClarke
When: 19 Feb 12 12:47
Steve Evans seems to have a very limited vocabulary Laugh
By:
TRICKYTREES
When: 19 Feb 12 12:47
well done to all you stoke backers !!!
like i said earlier its not very often that you see/get these  "just basically"  wrong odds !!!
i hope you all duly filled your boots :)
By:
Forest000
When: 19 Feb 12 12:48
hmm, i know i should trade, but I am so tempted not to!
By:
iamhewho
When: 19 Feb 12 12:48
ive traded 1/3 off , think stoke will keep this and odds will fall alot more
By:
loadedgimp
When: 19 Feb 12 12:48
TrickyTrees are you taking the piss?  The odds were way higher than 2.2!  Crawley have outplayed Stoke and some non-pen put them ahead.  You are kidding yourself if you think that was good odds/good betting
By:
MFC_1986
When: 19 Feb 12 12:49

Feb 19, 2012 -- 12:47PM, TRICKYTREES wrote:


well done to all you stoke backers !!!like i said earlier its not very often that you see/get these  "just basically"  wrong odds !!!i hope you all duly filled your boots :)


er... they got a penalty that never was .

By:
TRICKYTREES
When: 19 Feb 12 12:49
^^^   are u real ????    2.26  pre ko  was b loody massive value on stoke !!!
what planet u from ??
By:
MFC_1986
When: 19 Feb 12 12:50

Feb 19, 2012 -- 12:49PM, TRICKYTREES wrote:


^^^   are u real ????    2.26  pre ko  was b loody massive value on stoke !!!what planet u from ??


They havnt looked like scoring up till that point.

By:
JOCI Club
When: 19 Feb 12 12:50
Just shows the pathetic standard of refereeing. That challenge from Shotton was much worse than the one Delap got sent off for!
By:
TRICKYTREES
When: 19 Feb 12 12:51
i really dont care how the result is achieved ??  the main aim is to get comfortably green and to spot false/wrong prices !!!
i personally have achieved both  :)
By:
loadedgimp
When: 19 Feb 12 12:51
Erm I don't know how to get the graph up to see what Stoke were matched at but I saw at least 8's on ht and 4 on ft so no Stoke 2.2 was a sh1t bet.
By:
TRICKYTREES
When: 19 Feb 12 12:51
and the sending-off  was !!???     NOT
By:
Forest000
When: 19 Feb 12 12:51
the odds on stoke were big, anything that happens in the game after that is just how it is, and the skill is down to trading. 
just because stoke havent been so much in the game doesnt change the fact that the pre-match odds were big
By:
MFC_1986
When: 19 Feb 12 12:51

Feb 19, 2012 -- 12:51PM, TRICKYTREES wrote:


i really dont care how the result is achieved ??  the main aim is to get comfortably green and to spot false/wrong prices !!!i personally have achieved both  :)


You got lucky.

By:
TRICKYTREES
When: 19 Feb 12 12:51
EVANS and PULLIS fighting in the tunnel ??
By:
loadedgimp
When: 19 Feb 12 12:52
Sending off did not change much...Crawley were better before the sending off and after...
By:
TRICKYTREES
When: 19 Feb 12 12:52
I would take being lucky everyday   ty
By:
bigmo
When: 19 Feb 12 12:52
Forest000 trade if I was you. You know how unpredictable football is. Bank a profit by greening up. You know it makes sense.Excited
By:
loadedgimp
When: 19 Feb 12 12:53
As I said awful value and if you had used your "500" bet to lay stoke HT then back them you would be far richer and 2 years younger Laugh
By:
TRICKYTREES
When: 19 Feb 12 12:53
well said FOREST  ,  exactly the point i trying to make !!!
By:
iamhewho
When: 19 Feb 12 12:53
wd all stoke backers lucky or not
By:
MFC_1986
When: 19 Feb 12 12:53

Feb 19, 2012 -- 12:52PM, TRICKYTREES wrote:


I would take being lucky everyday

By:
iamhewho
When: 19 Feb 12 12:53
Cool
By:
TRICKYTREES
When: 19 Feb 12 12:54
loadedgimp :  if only we could see in the future ????

ive got a lovely green book now , so my job is done !!!

is yours ???
By:
loadedgimp
When: 19 Feb 12 12:54
You can take being lucky everyday Tricky, I laid Stoke HT and backed them after the sending off so no qualms here, I just don't think you had 500 quid to chuck on Stoke if you bet like that.
By:
TRICKYTREES
When: 19 Feb 12 12:55
cheers  iamhewho

some bitter people on here !???!!
By:
richiem222
When: 19 Feb 12 12:55
I am with forest here have some faith down to 10 men not traded yet will wait until the second half about 10 mins in.
By:
NobbyClarke
When: 19 Feb 12 12:55
Crawley are the better side?

The result will be decided by goals and Stoke's players are much more likely to convert chances than Crawley's.
By:
Forest000
When: 19 Feb 12 12:56
bigmo, you have nearly convinced me :D

i can trade
for £2.32 profit.  Before that I was looking at £5 profit/£13.75 liability

trickytrees, most people here dont understand even basic odds, let alone value.  They think they do, which is where the 'mugginess' comes in
By:
Forest000
When: 19 Feb 12 12:57
i cant see crawley scoring 2, and I couldnt prematch either.  I think the sending off makes 2 goals even less likely
By:
MFC_1986
When: 19 Feb 12 12:57
Green up and move on.
By:
TRICKYTREES
When: 19 Feb 12 12:58
gimp:what are you on about ??
you dont know me ,  you dont know how i bet ???

like i said on my very 1st post   stoke (premier league team)  were in my mind fantastic value at 2.26 and at that price i duly put a monkey on it !!!
with the view to trade if need be !!!

so ive been lucky ???     

i just dont understand the point you are trying to make ??
and for that reason im out !!!   Wink
By:
furrelli
When: 19 Feb 12 12:58
"for me 2012 it's a red card....."

no it fecking isn't! make a case for giving our game back! comms are jus as bad as the refs
By:
loadedgimp
When: 19 Feb 12 12:58
I can't back Stoke, regardless of price (did get them once 19/1 Stoke HT against Gillingham when a goal down)
dan_411 my bad if you were referring to Crouch, but Stoke as giants?  It's not pretty football and I would rather hold out for a better price if at all.
And they thought 2 was a good price
It looks like a 50/50 to me, and you guys are taking the shorter odds.

TRICKYTREES • February 19, 2012 12:21 PM GMT
5.1 stoke    jesus   i might have to go in again !!!!

We arent bitter, I just try to help people on the forum.  Trying to help you see your error otherwise you may lose your bank on a similar bet.  Forest you can bang on about value but how is 2.2 value when Stoke were above 5's?
By:
Forest000
When: 19 Feb 12 12:59
when were stoke above 5's?
By:
loadedgimp
When: 19 Feb 12 13:00
I only try to help, don't mean any harm.  Glad it came in for you mate!
Dunno Forest thats what Tricky said.
By:
letmesee
When: 19 Feb 12 13:00
gimp-really mate you made some very poor comments here. but good luck with ur bet. i actually think this will be a draw here now. but i am out of this game, just still dont like it.
By:
richiem222
When: 19 Feb 12 13:00
hmmm yeah Ary's roses are playing this afternoon should be easy money
By:
TRICKYTREES
When: 19 Feb 12 13:01
he means after the sending off !!!!   ha ha ha

like i said earlier we cant see into the future , can you ??
Page 5 of 7  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com