<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: VAN DYKES GOAL V CITY SHD HAVE STOOD</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/31888775/van-dykes-goal-v-city-shd-have-stood</link><description>The Premier League's Key Match Incidents panel believe Virgil van Dijk's chalked-off goal in Liverpool's 3-0 defeat to Manchester City SHOULD have been allowed to stand.Liverpool manager Arne Slot was incensed following the loss to City. "I think it</description><item><title>Similar one today with Murillo's goal. No blocking of keeper's view again either. There was no sudden movement by the offside player but I don't think Alisson had any chance whatsoever of saving it, it was hammered into the corner. You can't impact a</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/31888775/van-dykes-goal-v-city-shd-have-stood?post_id=565093315#565093315</link><description>Similar one today with Murillo's goal. No blocking of keeper's view again either. There was no sudden movement by the offside player but I don't think Alisson had any chance whatsoever of saving it, it was hammered into the corner. You can't impact a</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2025 13:15:09 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Ha ha, yeah, would have preferred it myself hadIsak stuck it in, then do doubt whatsoever</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/31888775/van-dykes-goal-v-city-shd-have-stood?post_id=565084457#565084457</link><description>Ha ha, yeah, would have preferred it myself hadIsak stuck it in, then do doubt whatsoever</description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 06:45:57 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>It's a tricky one but in this case I thing it was right to be disallowed because it would have been a goal for Liverpool and the more situations where we can disallow Liverpool goals is obviously a good thing.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/31888775/van-dykes-goal-v-city-shd-have-stood?post_id=565084445#565084445</link><description>It's a tricky one but in this case I thing it was right to be disallowed because it would have been a goal for Liverpool and the more situations where we can disallow Liverpool goals is obviously a good thing.</description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 06:40:10 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>It's a really interesting goal/non goalSo much to learn from it, and yes it doesn't set a precedentThere will be more interfering with goals givenAnd folk will come back to this one, which is whyLurkas explanation on Liverpool thread is worth a read.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/31888775/van-dykes-goal-v-city-shd-have-stood?post_id=565084433#565084433</link><description>It's a really interesting goal/non goalSo much to learn from it, and yes it doesn't set a precedentThere will be more interfering with goals givenAnd folk will come back to this one, which is whyLurkas explanation on Liverpool thread is worth a read.</description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 06:29:55 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>*Aspro agrees with duffy*</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/31888775/van-dykes-goal-v-city-shd-have-stood?post_id=565084331#565084331</link><description>*Aspro agrees with duffy*</description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 05:28:01 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Does anyone still care...move on, there'll be another incident along next weekend.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/31888775/van-dykes-goal-v-city-shd-have-stood?post_id=565084307#565084307</link><description>Does anyone still care...move on, there'll be another incident along next weekend.</description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 05:12:24 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>current refs must absolutely despise Webb</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/31888775/van-dykes-goal-v-city-shd-have-stood?post_id=565083973#565083973</link><description>current refs must absolutely despise Webb</description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2025 15:40:10 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Lol,If ball went in other corner it's a goal.I suggest you read the laws.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/31888775/van-dykes-goal-v-city-shd-have-stood?post_id=565083967#565083967</link><description>Lol,If ball went in other corner it's a goal.I suggest you read the laws.</description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2025 15:36:02 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Law says being in offside position is not an offence it self but player so positioned when the ball is played by teammate can be judged offside offence of they receive the ball or will become involved in active play or will interfere with an opponent</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/31888775/van-dykes-goal-v-city-shd-have-stood?post_id=565083925#565083925</link><description>Law says being in offside position is not an offence it self but player so positioned when the ball is played by teammate can be judged offside offence of they receive the ball or will become involved in active play or will interfere with an opponent</description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2025 15:00:14 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>If ball went in other corner it's a goal.I suggest you read the laws.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/31888775/van-dykes-goal-v-city-shd-have-stood?post_id=565083907#565083907</link><description>If ball went in other corner it's a goal.I suggest you read the laws.</description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2025 14:41:11 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
