<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Audio for Gyokeres penalty at Newcastle.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/31885571/audio-for-gyokeres-penalty-at-newcastle</link><description>https://x.com/MKTIRB/status/1974062443144806726</description><item><title>cross hit</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/31885571/audio-for-gyokeres-penalty-at-newcastle?post_id=565011245#565011245</link><description>cross hit</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 15:36:29 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>It was a pen all day long and we were lucky to get away with it.I thought the challenge on livermento was cowardly and a definate caution at least.in rugby he would of been off for tackling man in air without the ball.the 2 smacks in the face evened</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/31885571/audio-for-gyokeres-penalty-at-newcastle?post_id=565011243#565011243</link><description>It was a pen all day long and we were lucky to get away with it.I thought the challenge on livermento was cowardly and a definate caution at least.in rugby he would of been off for tackling man in air without the ball.the 2 smacks in the face evened</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 15:35:51 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Yeah half a ball is cut off for ball hitting stumps asthey cannot be absolutely certain on ball tracker.For a factual decision such as did he hit it, then an absolutedecision can be made thanks to snicko.As Pope is not moving we need a factual did he</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/31885571/audio-for-gyokeres-penalty-at-newcastle?post_id=565010687#565010687</link><description>Yeah half a ball is cut off for ball hitting stumps asthey cannot be absolutely certain on ball tracker.For a factual decision such as did he hit it, then an absolutedecision can be made thanks to snicko.As Pope is not moving we need a factual did he</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 12:14:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>With an LBW, if the umpire gave not out and then ball tracker shows the ball would have hit the outside of the stumps it stays with umpires call of not out, only if it would have hit the middle stump is the decision over turned, and vice versa.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/31885571/audio-for-gyokeres-penalty-at-newcastle?post_id=565010667#565010667</link><description>With an LBW, if the umpire gave not out and then ball tracker shows the ball would have hit the outside of the stumps it stays with umpires call of not out, only if it would have hit the middle stump is the decision over turned, and vice versa.</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 12:05:52 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>In cricket think of an lbw and snickometerAny snick off bat onto pad and lbw is cancelled for not out.Goalie needs any touch given his position and lack of motion.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/31885571/audio-for-gyokeres-penalty-at-newcastle?post_id=565010661#565010661</link><description>In cricket think of an lbw and snickometerAny snick off bat onto pad and lbw is cancelled for not out.Goalie needs any touch given his position and lack of motion.</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 12:03:04 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>When you put it that way, I suppose I'm suggesting the same as what they have in Cricket, umpires call, very often they prove an umpire wrong on a LBW but stick with his decision if the ball isn't hitting plum centre. I suppose I'm saying that an acc</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/31885571/audio-for-gyokeres-penalty-at-newcastle?post_id=565010655#565010655</link><description>When you put it that way, I suppose I'm suggesting the same as what they have in Cricket, umpires call, very often they prove an umpire wrong on a LBW but stick with his decision if the ball isn't hitting plum centre. I suppose I'm saying that an acc</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 11:59:09 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>If goalie gets a touch and still fouls gykores it can stillbe a pelanty, but, because goalie has foot planted he is clearlynot committing a foul having got a touch.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/31885571/audio-for-gyokeres-penalty-at-newcastle?post_id=565010649#565010649</link><description>If goalie gets a touch and still fouls gykores it can stillbe a pelanty, but, because goalie has foot planted he is clearlynot committing a foul having got a touch.</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 11:57:25 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>If goalie gets a touch and referee thought he did notthen it is by definition a clear error.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/31885571/audio-for-gyokeres-penalty-at-newcastle?post_id=565010639#565010639</link><description>If goalie gets a touch and referee thought he did notthen it is by definition a clear error.</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 11:53:58 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>If it hit his leg, and onto his arm it's not a pelanty by the laws.I cannot see where it's supposed to have hit his leg.Some suggest he played the ball onto elengas foot, and it hit himafter that, but that's a pelanty.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/31885571/audio-for-gyokeres-penalty-at-newcastle?post_id=565010633#565010633</link><description>If it hit his leg, and onto his arm it's not a pelanty by the laws.I cannot see where it's supposed to have hit his leg.Some suggest he played the ball onto elengas foot, and it hit himafter that, but that's a pelanty.</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 11:53:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The thing is though, even if you accept that the keeper got a slight touch on the ball, although you can literally say that an error has occured, i wasn't a clear an obvious one so the decision on the pitch should have stood.Webb said that VAR will n</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/31885571/audio-for-gyokeres-penalty-at-newcastle?post_id=565010631#565010631</link><description>The thing is though, even if you accept that the keeper got a slight touch on the ball, although you can literally say that an error has occured, i wasn't a clear an obvious one so the decision on the pitch should have stood.Webb said that VAR will n</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 11:52:40 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
