New Posts For Thread: Why are Southampton 1.39 v Burnley?https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30744341/why-are-southampton-139-v-burnleyThat price is ridiculously low. If one of the title contenders were playing Burnley at home would be be priced at sub 1.15? Southampton may win this but I will be laying that price and trading in play... sorry mate missed your reply.https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30744341/why-are-southampton-139-v-burnley?post_id=550190471#550190471.. sorry mate missed your reply.Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:05:15 -0500How did your trade in play get on ?https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30744341/why-are-southampton-139-v-burnley?post_id=550190447#550190447How did your trade in play get on ?Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:02:42 -0500Mesmerised, do you believe that 1.39 was a fair price for Southampton? And did you miss the part where I said "Southampton may win this but I will be laying that price and trading in play"????https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30744341/why-are-southampton-139-v-burnley?post_id=550185685#550185685Mesmerised, do you believe that 1.39 was a fair price for Southampton? And did you miss the part where I said "Southampton may win this but I will be laying that price and trading in play"????Sun, 16 Oct 2016 14:44:14 -0500Just wrote a lengthy, witty and insightful rebuttal to mesmerised but the quote function doesn't work properly on this **** forum. GLASGOWCALLING, it went quite well. Layed some off after HT (as mentioned above) and backed goals at HT so a profithttps://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30744341/why-are-southampton-139-v-burnley?post_id=550185655#550185655Just wrote a lengthy, witty and insightful rebuttal to mesmerised but the quote function doesn't work properly on this **** forum. GLASGOWCALLING, it went quite well. Layed some off after HT (as mentioned above) and backed goals at HT so a profitSun, 16 Oct 2016 14:41:08 -0500Not surprisingly mesmerised totally missed the point of this thread. GLASGOWCALLING, it went quite well. Partially layed some of it off after HT and backed over 1.5 at HT.https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30744341/why-are-southampton-139-v-burnley?post_id=550185597#550185597Not surprisingly mesmerised totally missed the point of this thread. GLASGOWCALLING, it went quite well. Partially layed some of it off after HT and backed over 1.5 at HT.Sun, 16 Oct 2016 14:37:59 -0500This thread reminds me of when Sofaking made a thread asking why Liverpool were odds on to beat Aston Villa, Liverpool won 6-0. Not quite that bad, but follows form. Will watch out for his next lay tip with added interest.https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30744341/why-are-southampton-139-v-burnley?post_id=550185489#550185489This thread reminds me of when Sofaking made a thread asking why Liverpool were odds on to beat Aston Villa, Liverpool won 6-0. Not quite that bad, but follows form. Will watch out for his next lay tip with added interest.Sun, 16 Oct 2016 14:29:29 -0500How did your trade in play get on ?https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30744341/why-are-southampton-139-v-burnley?post_id=550185195#550185195How did your trade in play get on ?Sun, 16 Oct 2016 14:04:34 -0500I can see bookies withdrawing their pen bets when Dean's in charge. 28/1 for 2 or more pens to be scored in this game.https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30744341/why-are-southampton-139-v-burnley?post_id=550184237#550184237I can see bookies withdrawing their pen bets when Dean's in charge. 28/1 for 2 or more pens to be scored in this game.Sun, 16 Oct 2016 12:31:42 -0500mesmerised 16 Oct 16 16:41 Joined: 10 Nov 10 | Topic/replies: 17,183 | Blogger: mesmerised's blogrefs have a tendency to make up for mistakes once they've seen them at half time, a second half pen for Burnley as soon as someone is touched in the box.https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30744341/why-are-southampton-139-v-burnley?post_id=550184125#550184125mesmerised 16 Oct 16 16:41 Joined: 10 Nov 10 | Topic/replies: 17,183 | Blogger: mesmerised's blogrefs have a tendency to make up for mistakes once they've seen them at half time, a second half pen for Burnley as soon as someone is touched in the box.Sun, 16 Oct 2016 12:16:23 -05003-1 full time. nice work Mike. thought a 5th would arrive but alas there's no cigarhttps://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30744341/why-are-southampton-139-v-burnley?post_id=550183967#5501839673-1 full time. nice work Mike. thought a 5th would arrive but alas there's no cigarSun, 16 Oct 2016 11:55:08 -0500