New Posts For Thread: Chelsea @ 3.6 v Spurs next weekhttps://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30683361/chelsea-36-v-spurs-next-weekAssuming Spurs still have the title to play for (anything less than defeat for Leicester at Man Utd and the title is surely theirs) Chelsea are too big. Being priced up on recent poor form, which is misleading, imo. One thing, they've had key peopleYou certainly are.. You said Chelsea were great value , then said you fancied spurs and its ended up a draw - congratulations you backed both teams and neither came in . The lowest Chelsea came into was 2.36, Ive checked on the markets so you're a cohttps://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30683361/chelsea-36-v-spurs-next-week?post_id=548580757#548580757You certainly are.. You said Chelsea were great value , then said you fancied spurs and its ended up a draw - congratulations you backed both teams and neither came in . The lowest Chelsea came into was 2.36, Ive checked on the markets so you're a coMon, 02 May 2016 15:54:09 -0500Idiothttps://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30683361/chelsea-36-v-spurs-next-week?post_id=548580229#548580229IdiotMon, 02 May 2016 15:26:45 -0500he spurts only when Norwich scores apparently unless they are playing for the 1-0https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30683361/chelsea-36-v-spurs-next-week?post_id=548580225#548580225he spurts only when Norwich scores apparently unless they are playing for the 1-0Mon, 02 May 2016 15:26:17 -0500https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30683361/chelsea-36-v-spurs-next-week?post_id=548580217#548580217Mon, 02 May 2016 15:25:35 -0500JC clearly you weren't posting for a trade as you have spent the whole opening post banging on about willian returning and the positive attributes of Chelsea. He's covered all angles , if spurs come in he says he fancied them, if Chelsea comes in hehttps://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30683361/chelsea-36-v-spurs-next-week?post_id=548580215#548580215JC clearly you weren't posting for a trade as you have spent the whole opening post banging on about willian returning and the positive attributes of Chelsea. He's covered all angles , if spurs come in he says he fancied them, if Chelsea comes in heMon, 02 May 2016 15:25:12 -0500Thought for a moment you were revealing yourself to be Wolf. That would have been a twisthttps://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30683361/chelsea-36-v-spurs-next-week?post_id=548579971#548579971Thought for a moment you were revealing yourself to be Wolf. That would have been a twistMon, 02 May 2016 15:13:29 -0500spurs not only giving chelsea a way back if they get one sent of but they'll be without one of these players for the next gamehttps://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30683361/chelsea-36-v-spurs-next-week?post_id=548579919#548579919spurs not only giving chelsea a way back if they get one sent of but they'll be without one of these players for the next gameMon, 02 May 2016 15:10:05 -0500the OP just stated he didn't fancy spurts win the game, hardly makes him a mug if they do, and of course they still may nothttps://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30683361/chelsea-36-v-spurs-next-week?post_id=548579899#548579899the OP just stated he didn't fancy spurts win the game, hardly makes him a mug if they do, and of course they still may notMon, 02 May 2016 15:08:29 -0500just decided to lay 1.1 leicester for the premiership.theyre 1.78 to beat everton and still need 2 its to be home, they were 1.06 before tonights game and with spurs being a 7/4 chance to win tonight pre match the market doesn't seem to have reacthttps://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30683361/chelsea-36-v-spurs-next-week?post_id=548579869#548579869just decided to lay 1.1 leicester for the premiership.theyre 1.78 to beat everton and still need 2 its to be home, they were 1.06 before tonights game and with spurs being a 7/4 chance to win tonight pre match the market doesn't seem to have reactMon, 02 May 2016 15:06:46 -0500Just to be clear here, I was never going to let my back of Chelsea ride, this was purely for a trade. Like I said, I had to make a decision on the outcome of the match to maximise return, and I felt a Spurs result was more likely, although not by muchttps://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30683361/chelsea-36-v-spurs-next-week?post_id=548579839#548579839Just to be clear here, I was never going to let my back of Chelsea ride, this was purely for a trade. Like I said, I had to make a decision on the outcome of the match to maximise return, and I felt a Spurs result was more likely, although not by mucMon, 02 May 2016 15:05:52 -0500