<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Mahooosive Gubbage in NFL</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30421119/mahooosive-gubbage-in-nfl</link><description>1.01    &Acirc;&pound;5,309        &Acirc;&pound;101,2121.02    &Acirc;&pound;361        &Acirc;&pound;173,8291.03    &Acirc;&pound;438        &Acirc;&pound;77,5271.04    &Acirc;&pound;608        &Acirc;&pound;50,9191.05    &Acirc;&pound;148        &Acirc;&pound;83,1851.06    &Acirc;&pound;120        &Acirc;&pound;87,9401.07            &Acirc;&pound;126,9121.08            &Acirc;&pound;203,3101.09    &Acirc;&pound;18        &Acirc;&pound;</description><item><title>yep it's difficult when you gotta get it to go 10 yards and give your players a chance to recover it. always like pure luck generally with as happened last night a player on the defense making a mess of catching it before allowing the offensive playe</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30421119/mahooosive-gubbage-in-nfl?post_id=543170191#543170191</link><description>yep it's difficult when you gotta get it to go 10 yards and give your players a chance to recover it. always like pure luck generally with as happened last night a player on the defense making a mess of catching it before allowing the offensive playe</description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:37:46 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Im sure they did practise onside kicks and OK recoverys but with the ovlong shaped ball its nearly impossible to tell which way it will bounce.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30421119/mahooosive-gubbage-in-nfl?post_id=543169459#543169459</link><description>Im sure they did practise onside kicks and OK recoverys but with the ovlong shaped ball its nearly impossible to tell which way it will bounce.</description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:52:54 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I would expect with it being such a big game both teams would have been practising it all week.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30421119/mahooosive-gubbage-in-nfl?post_id=543168947#543168947</link><description>I would expect with it being such a big game both teams would have been practising it all week.</description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:09:11 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>That is too small a sample to go by.  This year alone the percentage is 36% but you cannot go off of one season to call it, you need a bigger sample size.  The stats from 2000-12 put it at 19.7% That is a far truer sample size</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30421119/mahooosive-gubbage-in-nfl?post_id=543168883#543168883</link><description>That is too small a sample to go by.  This year alone the percentage is 36% but you cannot go off of one season to call it, you need a bigger sample size.  The stats from 2000-12 put it at 19.7% That is a far truer sample size</description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:04:29 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>even the 2 point conversion after the last touchdown in normal time was lucky!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30421119/mahooosive-gubbage-in-nfl?post_id=543168599#543168599</link><description>even the 2 point conversion after the last touchdown in normal time was lucky!</description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:39:13 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>yeah to be fair the 1.01 compared to the point in the game wasn't completely inaccurate. Seattle still needed two touchdowns with only 5 minutes off the clock and Green Bay in possession at the GB 40 yard line. This almost guaranteed the closest that</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30421119/mahooosive-gubbage-in-nfl?post_id=543168051#543168051</link><description>yeah to be fair the 1.01 compared to the point in the game wasn't completely inaccurate. Seattle still needed two touchdowns with only 5 minutes off the clock and Green Bay in possession at the GB 40 yard line. This almost guaranteed the closest that</description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 07:46:23 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>A study a few years back put it at 26%. If you separate it into expected onside kick (i.e. the opposition knows its coming) and surprise onside kick its 20% and 60% respectively.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30421119/mahooosive-gubbage-in-nfl?post_id=543168013#543168013</link><description>A study a few years back put it at 26%. If you separate it into expected onside kick (i.e. the opposition knows its coming) and surprise onside kick its 20% and 60% respectively.</description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 07:40:29 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Defo closer to 1 in 4</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30421119/mahooosive-gubbage-in-nfl?post_id=543166555#543166555</link><description>Defo closer to 1 in 4</description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 04:38:04 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Disagree, it would be 1 in 5.  Where do you get 1 in 3 from?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30421119/mahooosive-gubbage-in-nfl?post_id=543166325#543166325</link><description>Disagree, it would be 1 in 5.  Where do you get 1 in 3 from?</description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 04:07:12 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>recovery from onside kick is closer to 1 in 3</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30421119/mahooosive-gubbage-in-nfl?post_id=543165891#543165891</link><description>recovery from onside kick is closer to 1 in 3</description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 03:23:07 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
