<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: maybe all the dinosaures who said yesterdays newcastle goal was rightly dissallowed</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30176775/maybe-all-the-dinosaures-who-said-yesterdays-newcastle-goal-was-rightly-dissallowed</link><description>would like to come on and tell us what their take is on the fact that the referee has been dropped this week, after the spokesman for the pro refs body stated that it was an error of judgement on his part.</description><item><title>What has the fact whether Hart was getting any where near the ball got to do with the price of a packet of biscuits?Everything.  You're trying to claim he's offside because he was 'Preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30176775/maybe-all-the-dinosaures-who-said-yesterdays-newcastle-goal-was-rightly-dissallowed?post_id=537465935#537465935</link><description>What has the fact whether Hart was getting any where near the ball got to do with the price of a packet of biscuits?Everything.  You're trying to claim he's offside because he was 'Preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 15:24:49 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>He has not been suspended because of the decision he made for the goal (or any other particular decision) - If referees were suspended every time they made a mistake there would be none left for next week.The reason he has been suspended is because h</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30176775/maybe-all-the-dinosaures-who-said-yesterdays-newcastle-goal-was-rightly-dissallowed?post_id=537465045#537465045</link><description>He has not been suspended because of the decision he made for the goal (or any other particular decision) - If referees were suspended every time they made a mistake there would be none left for next week.The reason he has been suspended is because h</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 14:39:41 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Fred - you seem to be interpreting the rules differently to senior officials who have suspended the ref because he made a mistake - I think I'll accept their version</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30176775/maybe-all-the-dinosaures-who-said-yesterdays-newcastle-goal-was-rightly-dissallowed?post_id=537464923#537464923</link><description>Fred - you seem to be interpreting the rules differently to senior officials who have suspended the ref because he made a mistake - I think I'll accept their version</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 14:32:25 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>So in your opinion if Hart would have saved the shot without Gouffran being there, but conceded the same shot with Gouffran acting in the same manner ass he did, then what would your decision be?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30176775/maybe-all-the-dinosaures-who-said-yesterdays-newcastle-goal-was-rightly-dissallowed?post_id=537464169#537464169</link><description>So in your opinion if Hart would have saved the shot without Gouffran being there, but conceded the same shot with Gouffran acting in the same manner ass he did, then what would your decision be?</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:51:18 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>fredyou've got to give this one up.it seems that for the sake of your argument that you're now prepared to peddle the line that hart would have saved it.i'll say this for the last time.the refs guidlines state that if a player in an offside position</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30176775/maybe-all-the-dinosaures-who-said-yesterdays-newcastle-goal-was-rightly-dissallowed?post_id=537464049#537464049</link><description>fredyou've got to give this one up.it seems that for the sake of your argument that you're now prepared to peddle the line that hart would have saved it.i'll say this for the last time.the refs guidlines state that if a player in an offside position</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:45:52 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I never said he was not getting anywhere near it, I asked what that had got to do with anything? Where in the law does it say the keeper would have had to get near the ball in mexicano's or anyone elses opinion?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30176775/maybe-all-the-dinosaures-who-said-yesterdays-newcastle-goal-was-rightly-dissallowed?post_id=537463971#537463971</link><description>I never said he was not getting anywhere near it, I asked what that had got to do with anything? Where in the law does it say the keeper would have had to get near the ball in mexicano's or anyone elses opinion?</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:41:24 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>fred you've inadvertantly put it in a nutshell with your last question.if [as most seem to agree] hart was never going to save that, how can the newcastle player be "effecting the play"?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30176775/maybe-all-the-dinosaures-who-said-yesterdays-newcastle-goal-was-rightly-dissallowed?post_id=537463931#537463931</link><description>fred you've inadvertantly put it in a nutshell with your last question.if [as most seem to agree] hart was never going to save that, how can the newcastle player be "effecting the play"?</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:39:15 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>DonNo1 16 Jan 14 01:16 Joined: 11 Nov 10 | Topic/replies: 5,532 | Blogger: DonNo1's blogNo because even if he was in his the corner of his vision (certainly wasn't in the line of vision, spectrum of vision perhaps) he didn't prevent him from playing</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30176775/maybe-all-the-dinosaures-who-said-yesterdays-newcastle-goal-was-rightly-dissallowed?post_id=537463067#537463067</link><description>DonNo1 16 Jan 14 01:16 Joined: 11 Nov 10 | Topic/replies: 5,532 | Blogger: DonNo1's blogNo because even if he was in his the corner of his vision (certainly wasn't in the line of vision, spectrum of vision perhaps) he didn't prevent him from playing</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:51:19 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I here a lot of calls for the offside rule to be scrapped. I would love to see how that would work in practise. I think it would lead to an avalanche of goals with score lines like 14-10 becoming commonplace. In short it would turn football into a fa</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30176775/maybe-all-the-dinosaures-who-said-yesterdays-newcastle-goal-was-rightly-dissallowed?post_id=537461913#537461913</link><description>I here a lot of calls for the offside rule to be scrapped. I would love to see how that would work in practise. I think it would lead to an avalanche of goals with score lines like 14-10 becoming commonplace. In short it would turn football into a fa</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:19:46 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>not demoted for that decision imo  but who  really knows ?  why cant  refs  and linos hold a press conference before the managers are made to look like raging animals straight after a game .The rules need changed  to allow technology ,we need all pla</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30176775/maybe-all-the-dinosaures-who-said-yesterdays-newcastle-goal-was-rightly-dissallowed?post_id=537460825#537460825</link><description>not demoted for that decision imo  but who  really knows ?  why cant  refs  and linos hold a press conference before the managers are made to look like raging animals straight after a game .The rules need changed  to allow technology ,we need all pla</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:57:48 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
