New Posts For Thread: 10 game ban for a bite....zero game ban for a scratch.https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30099061/10-game-ban-for-a-bitezero-game-ban-for-a-scratchwell done fa......joke organisationRegarding the 10 game ban with Suarez regardless of what the FA claimed, the Dutch punishment had to play a part.so what you are saying is that the fa are lying ****s and are about as transparent as the albanian league when it comes to match fixing??https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30099061/10-game-ban-for-a-bitezero-game-ban-for-a-scratch?post_id=535765927#535765927Regarding the 10 game ban with Suarez regardless of what the FA claimed, the Dutch punishment had to play a part.so what you are saying is that the fa are lying ****s and are about as transparent as the albanian league when it comes to match fixing??Thu, 03 Oct 2013 10:49:41 -0500but you cant even admit that should have got quite a few games.Torres should have been sent off and that should have got a 3 game ban. However, the reasons are clear as to why that didn't happen. It's the same reason nothing happened to McManaman andhttps://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30099061/10-game-ban-for-a-bitezero-game-ban-for-a-scratch?post_id=535761793#535761793but you cant even admit that should have got quite a few games.Torres should have been sent off and that should have got a 3 game ban. However, the reasons are clear as to why that didn't happen. It's the same reason nothing happened to McManaman andThu, 03 Oct 2013 07:02:48 -0500i agreesuarez did deserve a ban.10 matches no chance.when you use other players bans ( a good yardstick for transparency) i think 6 would have been right.barton i think got 4 both both incidents yet imo the second was far far worse and should have gohttps://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30099061/10-game-ban-for-a-bitezero-game-ban-for-a-scratch?post_id=535760581#535760581i agreesuarez did deserve a ban.10 matches no chance.when you use other players bans ( a good yardstick for transparency) i think 6 would have been right.barton i think got 4 both both incidents yet imo the second was far far worse and should have goThu, 03 Oct 2013 05:13:53 -0500And the FA are just as culpable.If one of the officials did see the Torres incident - which I doubt btw considering he was clearly booked for the foul preceding it - why did the ref not send him off? And why did the FA not publicly remind the refereehttps://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30099061/10-game-ban-for-a-bitezero-game-ban-for-a-scratch?post_id=535760527#535760527And the FA are just as culpable.If one of the officials did see the Torres incident - which I doubt btw considering he was clearly booked for the foul preceding it - why did the ref not send him off? And why did the FA not publicly remind the refereeThu, 03 Oct 2013 05:07:37 -0500Your examples are a bit off G1, Thatcher should never have been allowed on a football pitch again after what he did to Mendes, especially considering he had done exactly the same thing before.Suarez deserved his ban, only a fool would suggest otherwihttps://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30099061/10-game-ban-for-a-bitezero-game-ban-for-a-scratch?post_id=535760479#535760479Your examples are a bit off G1, Thatcher should never have been allowed on a football pitch again after what he did to Mendes, especially considering he had done exactly the same thing before.Suarez deserved his ban, only a fool would suggest otherwiThu, 03 Oct 2013 05:03:59 -0500you can throw all the insults int he world to make your defensive stance look "credible" ....but you cant even admit that should have got quite a few games.it pains you to admit it.anyways the plot thickens.....fa failed to investigate match fixing ahttps://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30099061/10-game-ban-for-a-bitezero-game-ban-for-a-scratch?post_id=535760385#535760385you can throw all the insults int he world to make your defensive stance look "credible" ....but you cant even admit that should have got quite a few games.it pains you to admit it.anyways the plot thickens.....fa failed to investigate match fixing aThu, 03 Oct 2013 04:55:58 -0500It's not really the FA though. It all comes from UEFA and FIFA not wanting games to be re-refereed.https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30099061/10-game-ban-for-a-bitezero-game-ban-for-a-scratch?post_id=535750351#535750351It's not really the FA though. It all comes from UEFA and FIFA not wanting games to be re-refereed.Wed, 02 Oct 2013 11:42:05 -0500Marcce • October 2, 2013 4:46 PM BSTLook the FA rules are clear on this. If one of the officials has seen an incident then no further action can be taken. He should have been sent off for it but wasn't.another farcical rule of the FAs btwhttps://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30099061/10-game-ban-for-a-bitezero-game-ban-for-a-scratch?post_id=535750247#535750247Marcce • October 2, 2013 4:46 PM BSTLook the FA rules are clear on this. If one of the officials has seen an incident then no further action can be taken. He should have been sent off for it but wasn't.another farcical rule of the FAs btwWed, 02 Oct 2013 11:35:18 -0500Take it from me it's embarrassing.Thatcher was done in 2006 under a different disciplinary process to the one that's there now. Plus if you honestly think what Torres did compares in any way to what Thatcher did you're even more deluded than I thoughhttps://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30099061/10-game-ban-for-a-bitezero-game-ban-for-a-scratch?post_id=535749757#535749757Take it from me it's embarrassing.Thatcher was done in 2006 under a different disciplinary process to the one that's there now. Plus if you honestly think what Torres did compares in any way to what Thatcher did you're even more deluded than I thoughWed, 02 Oct 2013 11:03:51 -0500Quite right aaron but no doubt was factored in.https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/30099061/10-game-ban-for-a-bitezero-game-ban-for-a-scratch?post_id=535749695#535749695Quite right aaron but no doubt was factored in.Wed, 02 Oct 2013 10:59:06 -0500