<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Man City v Reading</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29597715/man-city-v-reading</link><description>Reading 4-5-1Reading: Federici, Gunter, Harte, Mariappa, Pearce, Leigertwood, Karacan, Tabb, McAnuff, Kebe, PogrebnyakSubs: Taylor, Shorey, Gorkss, Guthrie, Robson-Kanu, Le Fondre, HuntMan City: Hart, Zabaleta, K Toure, Barry, Nastasic, Rekik, Silva,</description><item><title>50/50 shorey would have prob got a foul if he made any attempt to play the ball, def not a blatant foul like the reading manager is making out, whats this blatant pen he is talking about ????</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29597715/man-city-v-reading?post_id=527445077#527445077</link><description>50/50 shorey would have prob got a foul if he made any attempt to play the ball, def not a blatant foul like the reading manager is making out, whats this blatant pen he is talking about ????</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 06:13:55 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Blatant foul.He had 2 hands on the defenders back. to be fair and from an independent view, Barry made a genuine attempt to attack the ball which he has every right to - Shorey cant stand and duck and expect to get away with it - what sort of defendi</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29597715/man-city-v-reading?post_id=527444293#527444293</link><description>Blatant foul.He had 2 hands on the defenders back. to be fair and from an independent view, Barry made a genuine attempt to attack the ball which he has every right to - Shorey cant stand and duck and expect to get away with it - what sort of defendi</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 05:02:34 -0600</pubDate></item><item><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29597715/man-city-v-reading?post_id=527443825#527443825</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 04:04:57 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>SPOT ON</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29597715/man-city-v-reading?post_id=527437277#527437277</link><description>SPOT ON</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 17:17:41 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>they havent played well since adam johnson got flogged imo</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29597715/man-city-v-reading?post_id=527437063#527437063</link><description>they havent played well since adam johnson got flogged imo</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 17:07:02 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Also Mancini is an awful manager. It doesn't read the damn game, he doesn't know what to do when other teams bring the bus, he simply has no clue of what to do except relying on inspirational moments from individuals.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29597715/man-city-v-reading?post_id=527427185#527427185</link><description>Also Mancini is an awful manager. It doesn't read the damn game, he doesn't know what to do when other teams bring the bus, he simply has no clue of what to do except relying on inspirational moments from individuals.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 11:10:20 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Depends on the cases. You are right about games like this, as I told back there it would be a close victory, but you do not lay games like Barcelona, not even with 22 blokes from Reading hiding inside the box.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29597715/man-city-v-reading?post_id=527427133#527427133</link><description>Depends on the cases. You are right about games like this, as I told back there it would be a close victory, but you do not lay games like Barcelona, not even with 22 blokes from Reading hiding inside the box.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 11:08:34 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>perfect example as to why trading is the way forward....the coonts would still try and argue that backing City in-play was more value than laying your initial bet</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29597715/man-city-v-reading?post_id=527427061#527427061</link><description>perfect example as to why trading is the way forward....the coonts would still try and argue that backing City in-play was more value than laying your initial bet</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 11:04:29 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Well done for City, great h(e)art, another close victory against anti-football!!!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29597715/man-city-v-reading?post_id=527427015#527427015</link><description>Well done for City, great h(e)art, another close victory against anti-football!!!</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 11:02:03 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Ref was giving Reading all the time and facility, forgiving them fouls, cards, penalties, wasted time, fakes, anti-sportsmanship... What did you want?????? City goal disallowed????????? That would be the cherry on top of the cake!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29597715/man-city-v-reading?post_id=527426971#527426971</link><description>Ref was giving Reading all the time and facility, forgiving them fouls, cards, penalties, wasted time, fakes, anti-sportsmanship... What did you want?????? City goal disallowed????????? That would be the cherry on top of the cake!</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 10:59:41 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
