New Posts For Thread: phantom goal!https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29385505/phantom-goali have still not seen daylight between the ball and the goal line. therefore it WAS not a goal.what I couldn't understand was why the player who headed the ball didn't just bury it in the back of the net. a free header right in front of goal should never have led to a dispute about whether the ball was over the line or not. as it stands, he mihttps://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29385505/phantom-goal?post_id=524245003#524245003what I couldn't understand was why the player who headed the ball didn't just bury it in the back of the net. a free header right in front of goal should never have led to a dispute about whether the ball was over the line or not. as it stands, he miTue, 18 Sep 2012 05:09:36 -0500I presume all the bookies will be refunding on the Everton win bets!https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29385505/phantom-goal?post_id=524234297#524234297I presume all the bookies will be refunding on the Everton win bets!Mon, 17 Sep 2012 18:00:53 -0500Cass, I realise that this is now as irrelevant as it gets but talk me through which part of this ball isn't over the line!!!https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151054899641452&set=a.204791236451.130145.7063141451&type=1&theaterhttps://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29385505/phantom-goal?post_id=524233581#524233581Cass, I realise that this is now as irrelevant as it gets but talk me through which part of this ball isn't over the line!!!https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151054899641452&set=a.204791236451.130145.7063141451&type=1&theaterMon, 17 Sep 2012 17:31:42 -0500The angle just shown on SSN has clear "daylight" between the ball and the line.Just saying......https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29385505/phantom-goal?post_id=524232857#524232857The angle just shown on SSN has clear "daylight" between the ball and the line.Just saying......Mon, 17 Sep 2012 17:04:51 -0500there was no goal line camera, so you have to allow compensation for the slight angle.https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29385505/phantom-goal?post_id=524232073#524232073there was no goal line camera, so you have to allow compensation for the slight angle.Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:36:57 -0500Cassanova, it is fact that it wasn't a goal but your "fact" observation was backing-up your opinion that it never crossed the line. Different animals.https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29385505/phantom-goal?post_id=524232019#524232019Cassanova, it is fact that it wasn't a goal but your "fact" observation was backing-up your opinion that it never crossed the line. Different animals.Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:35:28 -0500On what basis is it fact?it was not given, fact. that's it.https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29385505/phantom-goal?post_id=524231931#524231931On what basis is it fact?it was not given, fact. that's it.Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:32:31 -0500cassanova 17 Sep 12 22:23 fact,On what basis is it fact?Had it been given against my team, I certainly would not be complaining.https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29385505/phantom-goal?post_id=524231725#524231725cassanova 17 Sep 12 22:23 fact,On what basis is it fact?Had it been given against my team, I certainly would not be complaining.Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:25:56 -0500fact,https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29385505/phantom-goal?post_id=524231649#524231649fact,Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:23:37 -0500would the game have restarted yet if goal line technology was available or would we be on angle no 247https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29385505/phantom-goal?post_id=524231629#524231629would the game have restarted yet if goal line technology was available or would we be on angle no 247Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:23:02 -0500