<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: mug punters backing 1.01</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29383847/mug-punters-backing-101</link><description>why are you prepared to back at  1.01. is it worth the risk ?</description><item><title>Well, from time to time I lay correct score at 100, has never lost yet.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29383847/mug-punters-backing-101?post_id=524222545#524222545</link><description>Well, from time to time I lay correct score at 100, has never lost yet.</description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:59:11 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>SOME OF THEM WERE VERY CLEVER PEOPLE AND WORKED AT BIG BANKS BEFORE THEY WENT TO PRISON AND GAMBLERS ANNONOMOUSE</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29383847/mug-punters-backing-101?post_id=524221529#524221529</link><description>SOME OF THEM WERE VERY CLEVER PEOPLE AND WORKED AT BIG BANKS BEFORE THEY WENT TO PRISON AND GAMBLERS ANNONOMOUSE</description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:27:09 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>THEY GET QUITE ANGRY WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT CERTS</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29383847/mug-punters-backing-101?post_id=524221483#524221483</link><description>THEY GET QUITE ANGRY WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT CERTS</description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:25:58 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>AT GAMBLERS ANNONOMOUSE THERE KNOWN ASTHE 1.01 ERS</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29383847/mug-punters-backing-101?post_id=524221249#524221249</link><description>AT GAMBLERS ANNONOMOUSE THERE KNOWN ASTHE 1.01 ERS</description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:17:42 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>THERES A BIG GANG OF THEM</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29383847/mug-punters-backing-101?post_id=524221133#524221133</link><description>THERES A BIG GANG OF THEM</description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:14:24 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>ITS THE SAME WITH HIS MATE WHO LAYED THEM</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29383847/mug-punters-backing-101?post_id=524221097#524221097</link><description>ITS THE SAME WITH HIS MATE WHO LAYED THEM</description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:13:23 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>THERES A BLOKE I KNOW WHO MAKES MORE  MONEY OUT OF SELLING THE BIG ISSUE THAN BY BACKING 1.01 S,HE THOUGHT HE COULD MAKE MORE BACKING 1.01 S BUT HE FINALLY AGREES WITH ME NOW HE SELLS THEM BECAUSE HES NO MONEY</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29383847/mug-punters-backing-101?post_id=524221079#524221079</link><description>THERES A BLOKE I KNOW WHO MAKES MORE  MONEY OUT OF SELLING THE BIG ISSUE THAN BY BACKING 1.01 S,HE THOUGHT HE COULD MAKE MORE BACKING 1.01 S BUT HE FINALLY AGREES WITH ME NOW HE SELLS THEM BECAUSE HES NO MONEY</description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:12:43 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Some are value and some are not, same as any price.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29383847/mug-punters-backing-101?post_id=524214331#524214331</link><description>Some are value and some are not, same as any price.</description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 07:28:39 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I wondered why you were making the point. I'd already done so at 11.36. This comment: "Does this mean that a 1.99 will go wrong 99 in 100 times?" is supposed to be a reductio ad absurdum.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29383847/mug-punters-backing-101?post_id=524213405#524213405</link><description>I wondered why you were making the point. I'd already done so at 11.36. This comment: "Does this mean that a 1.99 will go wrong 99 in 100 times?" is supposed to be a reductio ad absurdum.</description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 06:46:04 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I put succesfull in my last sentence when i meant to put unsuccessfull</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29383847/mug-punters-backing-101?post_id=524213333#524213333</link><description>I put succesfull in my last sentence when i meant to put unsuccessfull</description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 06:42:56 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
