<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Middlesbrough v Southampton</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29074135/middlesbrough-v-southampton</link><description>This is a tight one to call as there is a lot on it for both sides. Have layed Middlesbrough and gone over 2.5. Any thoughts on this one?</description><item><title>1-3</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29074135/middlesbrough-v-southampton?post_id=518872361#518872361</link><description>1-3</description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:21:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>west ham will stuff foxes</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29074135/middlesbrough-v-southampton?post_id=518872349#518872349</link><description>west ham will stuff foxes</description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:20:55 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>well played the boro boys</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29074135/middlesbrough-v-southampton?post_id=518872261#518872261</link><description>well played the boro boys</description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:18:33 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Agree, the real leicester will turn up against west ham</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29074135/middlesbrough-v-southampton?post_id=518872077#518872077</link><description>Agree, the real leicester will turn up against west ham</description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:14:49 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>likewise cant see cardiff losing at palace so this boro win might mean little</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29074135/middlesbrough-v-southampton?post_id=518872041#518872041</link><description>likewise cant see cardiff losing at palace so this boro win might mean little</description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:13:54 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>ah well, Cheers fef, another top game from the men in charge.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29074135/middlesbrough-v-southampton?post_id=518872037#518872037</link><description>ah well, Cheers fef, another top game from the men in charge.</description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:13:48 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>warnock cant keep his nose out of anything tbf saints should hammer cov next weekend not sure they will need to as cant see wham beating foxes</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29074135/middlesbrough-v-southampton?post_id=518872013#518872013</link><description>warnock cant keep his nose out of anything tbf saints should hammer cov next weekend not sure they will need to as cant see wham beating foxes</description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:13:12 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>SY read this.http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/neil-warnock-how-i-played-a-small-part-in-readings-rise-to-top-flight-7665773.htmlIf saints had sign Gorkks</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29074135/middlesbrough-v-southampton?post_id=518871889#518871889</link><description>SY read this.http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/neil-warnock-how-i-played-a-small-part-in-readings-rise-to-top-flight-7665773.htmlIf saints had sign Gorkks</description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:08:56 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Chapliow's injury hurt saints massively.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29074135/middlesbrough-v-southampton?post_id=518871867#518871867</link><description>Chapliow's injury hurt saints massively.</description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:08:16 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>MIddlesborough would have still had to go for it and would be more gaps for them</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29074135/middlesbrough-v-southampton?post_id=518871817#518871817</link><description>MIddlesborough would have still had to go for it and would be more gaps for them</description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:07:08 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
