<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Howard Webb - disgraceful</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/28899359/howard-webb---disgraceful</link><description>Unbelievable stuff from him today. As a neutral football supporter with no financial involvement in the game. I cannot believe what I saw. If he is England's best referee then God help the rest of them, he totally screwed one team out of that game. S</description><item><title>Something like that, Mex.Care would have to be taken not to disrupt the flow of the game too much, but I think something could be worked in because of the delays contentious decisions tend to cause; see how long it takes for a penalty to be taken fro</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/28899359/howard-webb---disgraceful?post_id=516013681#516013681</link><description>Something like that, Mex.Care would have to be taken not to disrupt the flow of the game too much, but I think something could be worked in because of the delays contentious decisions tend to cause; see how long it takes for a penalty to be taken fro</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:45:29 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>it seems to me that we could take a lead from the nfl.teams allowed a certain number of challenges.if on review there's no clear cut mistake they stick to the ruling on the field,</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/28899359/howard-webb---disgraceful?post_id=516013531#516013531</link><description>it seems to me that we could take a lead from the nfl.teams allowed a certain number of challenges.if on review there's no clear cut mistake they stick to the ruling on the field,</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:40:44 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>If it's ambiguous after a plethora of replays, then it can't be judged a foul imo. The problem is that too many decisions that aren't clear cut are being given as stonewall. That's what the technology would solve, in my view.We'll never get a perfect</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/28899359/howard-webb---disgraceful?post_id=516013447#516013447</link><description>If it's ambiguous after a plethora of replays, then it can't be judged a foul imo. The problem is that too many decisions that aren't clear cut are being given as stonewall. That's what the technology would solve, in my view.We'll never get a perfect</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:37:18 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Maybe I'm just being a dinosaur in not wanting it, but it feels to me like it wouldn't work because we're not dealing with clear cut decisions, it's all about opinions.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/28899359/howard-webb---disgraceful?post_id=516013195#516013195</link><description>Maybe I'm just being a dinosaur in not wanting it, but it feels to me like it wouldn't work because we're not dealing with clear cut decisions, it's all about opinions.</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:27:11 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>That's why I'd use an appeals ssytem. 2 appeals per side -- if you are correct in appealing, you retain the 2 appeals. If incorrect, you lose one.Probably have to be coupled with some sort of 'incident timeframe' whereby an appeal could only be used</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/28899359/howard-webb---disgraceful?post_id=516012981#516012981</link><description>That's why I'd use an appeals ssytem. 2 appeals per side -- if you are correct in appealing, you retain the 2 appeals. If incorrect, you lose one.Probably have to be coupled with some sort of 'incident timeframe' whereby an appeal could only be used</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:20:53 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Maybe - but don't you think we'd have to stop 15-20 times a game?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/28899359/howard-webb---disgraceful?post_id=516012771#516012771</link><description>Maybe - but don't you think we'd have to stop 15-20 times a game?</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:13:20 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Perhaps Jason, but if a Video ref took a look at a challenge and couldn't make a definitive call on it, then he'd just have to give no foul and play on. Manager's might still cry, but they couldn't really argue if a call can't easily made via replay.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/28899359/howard-webb---disgraceful?post_id=516012747#516012747</link><description>Perhaps Jason, but if a Video ref took a look at a challenge and couldn't make a definitive call on it, then he'd just have to give no foul and play on. Manager's might still cry, but they couldn't really argue if a call can't easily made via replay.</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:12:11 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Not sure about the video technology dza - would there be less disagreements? You don't see many challenges that everyone agrees with, after a replay. I agree with your other suggestions though.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/28899359/howard-webb---disgraceful?post_id=516012437#516012437</link><description>Not sure about the video technology dza - would there be less disagreements? You don't see many challenges that everyone agrees with, after a replay. I agree with your other suggestions though.</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:59:14 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I think some of the refs are poor, but the FA/FIFA really need to update the way the game is officiated. It's time for video refs and an appeals system similar to Tennis/Cricket. Too many big calls get shown to be incorrect by a TV replay that takes</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/28899359/howard-webb---disgraceful?post_id=516012159#516012159</link><description>I think some of the refs are poor, but the FA/FIFA really need to update the way the game is officiated. It's time for video refs and an appeals system similar to Tennis/Cricket. Too many big calls get shown to be incorrect by a TV replay that takes</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:47:47 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>not all players try to cheat but in principal totally agree with poppydog and they get one look and one angle to get it right not half a dozen different ones in slow motion ,thankless task for any individual</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/28899359/howard-webb---disgraceful?post_id=516011949#516011949</link><description>not all players try to cheat but in principal totally agree with poppydog and they get one look and one angle to get it right not half a dozen different ones in slow motion ,thankless task for any individual</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:38:32 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
