Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
a1
14 Jul 19 19:45
Joined:
Date Joined: 21 Jan 04
| Topic/replies: 121 | Blogger: a1's blog
Surely England won the Super Over.

Betfair settled it as  a Dead Heat

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 26
By:
Angoose
When: 14 Jul 19 19:52
The match market was voided, the super over is not included in the match market.
There was an option to back the tie as a method of covering yourself on the match market.

If you wanted to bet on the super over, you needed to do it through the outright WC winner market.
By:
Angoose
When: 14 Jul 19 19:53
Was there a market just for the super over ?
By:
a1
When: 14 Jul 19 19:56
Yes there was a Super Over market.

Settled as a Dead Heat.

Cant see anything in the rules to make it a dead heat
By:
Angoose
When: 14 Jul 19 20:00
It was a dead heat though, 15 runs each.
England won the match due to the boundary count back but they didn't win the super over.
By:
a1
When: 14 Jul 19 20:01
But the match was also a dead heat and all bets were void.

Why are bets settled differently?
By:
Angoose
When: 14 Jul 19 20:03
Get in touch with customer services.
I didn't even see the market so didn't see the rules.
By:
Lucky Sod
When: 14 Jul 19 20:07
a1 i'm in same boat my bet settled as a dead heat was expecting a voidSad
By:
tonkability
When: 14 Jul 19 20:08
There couldn’t be a tie it’s in the super over rules the price was factored in as England had advantage Betfair have just made it up
By:
a1
When: 14 Jul 19 20:09
Yes.

Looked at their rules and there is nothing there.
By:
tonkability
When: 14 Jul 19 20:20
I just contacted customer services they are dealing with huge amount  complaints will contact when they can
By:
a1
When: 14 Jul 19 20:30
Nice Tonka. Can you keep us updated
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 14 Jul 19 20:30
super over was a tie

15-15

england won world cup because they scored more boundaries than nz
in 50 overs plus super over.


sky had nz needing 16 to win, in the super over, which was correct,
as the tie they achieved gave victory to england
By:
tomtimtum
When: 14 Jul 19 20:45
Super over rules -

https://twitter.com/BetfairCS/status/1150489366101450753
By:
tomtimtum
When: 14 Jul 19 20:45
It was settled as a dead heat per their rules
By:
Scribes
When: 14 Jul 19 20:46

Jul 14, 2019 -- 8:20PM, tonkability wrote:


I just contacted customer services they are dealing with huge amount

By:
tonkability
When: 14 Jul 19 20:47
I have Betfair playing hardball saying in their rules which are at odds with super over rules  were always there has there ever been a super over before ? and punter backed or layed to the rules on tv screens (fact) so Betfair were effectively
Putting up a market under false pretences.Their rep says they had already given a huge amount of commission away by
Voiding match result
By:
Angoose
When: 14 Jul 19 20:51
It's pretty clear if you read the rules shown on the link above.

I had a nice green screen on the match market but stupidly didn't back the ti.
C'est la vie.
By:
tonkability
When: 14 Jul 19 20:52
Tom super over can never be a tie that’s what it’s all about England always had advantage which was reflected in prices anybody getting their money back fromNew Zealand wouldn’t of expected it
By:
tomtimtum
When: 14 Jul 19 20:53
The market probably didnt realise how betfair settled the market (I certainly didnt but will know for future)
By:
wondersobright
When: 14 Jul 19 20:53
tonkability • July 14, 2019 8:08 PM BST
There couldn’t be a tie it’s in the super over rules the price was factored in as England had advantage Betfair have just made it up


the super over was a TIE
15 runs each side

England have been determined as match & therefore WC winners on boundary countback
this has fook all to do with the match market or super over market
both, for betting purposes, ended as a TIE
and as per betfair rules, the match market was voided & the super over market settled as a DH

if you don't like or understand the rules you really shouldn't be betting imo
By:
wondersobright
When: 14 Jul 19 20:55
tonkability • July 14, 2019 8:52 PM BST
Tom super over can never be a tie that’s what it’s all about


wrong

the super over can be a tie, and was today

further countback is completely irrelevant

here are the rules https://twitter.com/BetfairCS/status/1150489366101450753

sorry you have done your money, move on
By:
tonkability
When: 14 Jul 19 21:10
Oh I shouldn’t be betting Not so bright the super over is designed to make a winner   Simples the count back is factored in ,the rules were on tv screens and Betfair prices will have reflected that  I gues you backed NZ  well done
By:
Angoose
When: 15 Jul 19 10:53
The rules of how the world cup would be settled were on the tv screen, the rules of how the Betfair market would be settled were available on the Betfair screen.
By:
jucel69
When: 15 Jul 19 11:01
It's always much easier just to bet on the 'winner' market once you get to semis/finals.
England won the tournament but they didn't win the super over, as per BF rules.
By:
detraveller
When: 15 Jul 19 11:09

Jul 15, 2019 -- 11:01AM, jucel69 wrote:


It's always much easier just to bet on the 'winner' market once you get to semis/finals.England won the tournament but they didn't win the super over, as per BF rules.


I had 700 green on both teams when the tie happened. For a few min i was sad that all my work has gone to waste.

Then it hit me.

I was using the outright market because i had it bookmarked on the phone. Grin

By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 15 Jul 19 11:18
what a mistake to make

CoolCool
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com