Cricket
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
I'm in 2 minds about this one. New Zealand have had a run of good form in the last year, but prior to that they were dreadful. Lost 4-0 to Banglas. SL have a good top order but their middle order is weak, but they do have Slinga who can win a match on his own and some useful spinners.
Forecast is dry and sunny, which should favour SL. So on paper an SL win, but if the NZ that played against England turns up and don't lose wickets to Slinga then NZ win.
Should be a good match for in play with volatile prices.
Forecast is dry and sunny, which should favour SL. So on paper an SL win, but if the NZ that played against England turns up and don't lose wickets to Slinga then NZ win.
Should be a good match for in play with volatile prices.
Show More
'I think that got an inside edge' 
only a foot away, who is this mug.
only a foot away, who is this mug.
I think they'll trade longer at some point, so in that respect you are right to be on SL!
this is exactly what happens when you play so very defensive chasing a low total
every single time. are cricketers that stupid not to learn from the same mistakes time and time again?
every single time. are cricketers that stupid not to learn from the same mistakes time and time again?
Cant listen to these ninnies constantly yelping every ball
Nothing annoys me more than when umpires make mistakes like that - they are only 20 yards away FFS - how could he possibly miss the hit. I'm 300 miles away and shouted at the screen - he hit that. Such incompetence breathtaking.
Cricketers and most sports people are not the most intelligent people as a rule.
Jun 9, 2013 -- 4:02PM, Srichaphan or Ancic? wrote:
Cricketers and most sports people are not the most intelligent people as a rule.
some of the punters aren't the brightest either it seems
Sri-Lanka missed a trick - needed to bowl Malinga out there ain't gonna be a 50th over !
brainless captaincy malinga should have bowled when the mcullums started partnership
Southee open them shoulders and top edge it to cover !!!!
Might as well just scrap upmires and have someone sitting next to the TV screen for decisions
Sri Lanka need to stop these Bangladeshi tactics of screaming at the umpire every ball. If I was the umpire I would give each incorrect shout as a wide.
Are the umps going to get any decision right? Last 10 overs they've given 2 out that weren't and 2 not that were!
NZ won't see off another Malinga over. Open the shoulders and get the runs now I say!
i dont know why sri lanka are having a go a the NZ players
Wonder how may wickets muralithiran would have got with reviews in place for the last 15 years
australia have gone down in the rankings since the review system was brought in
good luck to those betting on this at this stage! 9 down but 1 edge for 4 pretty much nails it 
Or maybe 5 wides from malinga
Or maybe 5 wides from malinga
I got p9ssy pants, I backed nz then laid 1.07 to get stake back but now it doesn't matter much either way , couldn't let this go wrong , woulda been brain damage
I doubt if we are seeing the winners here somehow
southee will need a single at some point too here. Sri Lanka surely will fancy it with an over at the number 11
class bowling from malinga, very well played by southee too though. Not on strike though next over.
ive not taken out the "draw insurance2 simply as ive never done it before., too late to do it nowadays , no tie pleeeeease
Well done NZ backers you have probably lost 5 years off your lives
missed that 2nd innings,,what was the highest odds on kiwis in 2nd innings pls
Jun 9, 2013 -- 5:53PM, the big bossman wrote:
did any body make money on this
yep. Fancied SL weren't trying so backed NZ a lot.
Jun 10, 2013 -- 10:53AM, mcfc1981 wrote:
what was the highest price on nz during the chase???
I saw 1.81 I think.
cheers what point was that at????
whats odds were they on the last wicket???
whats odds were they on the last wicket???
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539