By:
agreed
|
By:
Just another fyi, 160+ matched at 100 ;)
|
By:
Well - where's the money going now !
|
By:
How have they got to this score? Complete joke.
|
By:
on the flip side sixers layer overjoyed yippee, may have to save stake at the turnariound,
|
By:
163 TOTAL
|
By:
that didn't look possible at 82 for 5 after 13.3
|
By:
ludicrous considering where they were. That's T20 !
|
By:
A couple of these bowlers have got a lot to answer for if Sydney lose.
|
By:
carnage
|
By:
On a sticky wicket, can't help but think this total is massive, as are the 1.70 odds...
|
By:
amazing incredible!!!!!! again girt from bookies 3/1 for Titans... Christmas arrived very soon in last 2 days... (yesterday Lions 4/1)
|
By:
It needs a correction.
|
By:
those 2 put on 81 runs off the last 39 balls !!
|
By:
The 1.7 odds suggest it will be a close match.
|
By:
I know SoA, I had some money on over 130+ and 140+ and I feared that I might lose those bets.... so to get to 160+ is a great turnaround. That type of batting from Weise was something else - not quite an Umar Gul or AB de Villiers knock but still, he has had a massive impact on the result here I feel.
|
By:
Wow! Sixers really have blown this. They don't even have Watson to open the batting...
|
By:
Where is GSM?
|
By:
Last 5 overs 15 RPO
|
By:
it goes for Titans...
|
By:
Sixers won't die wondering.
Titans a good lay early doors but may well go on to win. |
By:
1.6s is value...
|
By:
market may well flirt with the flip at times during this chase , but ultimately I expect Titans to win this quite comfortably
|
By:
HHuge money at 1/3. Only a matter of time. CRASH
|
By:
Cricinfo getting a bit overdramatic
'What a turnaround. They have nearly doubled their 16-over score of 91. ' |
By:
Weise might win an IPL contract with knocks like that !!!
|
By:
*Wiese
|
By:
Sixers are a bowling side without Watson - tough chase here
|
By:
One thing people forgot when wickets fell was the titans kept the scoreborad ticking. They only dipped under 6 an over for 1 over so recovery was no surprise and 1.25 Syndey was nuts, However that said 2.6 them now is too big. This is not a bad wicket at all
|
By:
Which bowlers will deliver? Not sure about Thomas.
Van the man possibly. |
By:
LUST=CLASSIC LATE ONE
|
By:
4.4
|
By:
terrible start from Links, three long hops
|
By:
Utter filth
|
By:
Why are they saying 'it really is a mountain to climb'. It is 163 not 193.
|
By:
Because they're obsessed with saying these pitches are slow.
They're not. |
By:
163 is chaseable if you hit the singles and knock the bad balls to the boundary without losing too many early wickets.
|
By:
because it's a tough pitch to bat on SoA. you went a bit quiet yesterday after saying that Delhi would definitely defend their total and that Lions needed at least 155 to be competitive?
|
By:
no I didnt
|
By:
even when they were 7 or 8 down I was still posting on here.
|