Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
GOD .
29 Dec 09 10:31
Joined:
Date Joined: 23 Feb 09
| Topic/replies: 274 | Blogger: GOD .'s blog
...Why do teams do this?

If i were captain and had one wicket remaining i'd tell the two batsmen to try and hit every ball for 4/6, no matter what it is.

If we then get another 30/40 runs off 2/3 overs then great, bigger target, and what is two overs going to matter at the end?

Does it seem this way to anyone else?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 25
By:
foolds gold
When: 29 Dec 09 10:32
Depends who you ask. Try asking Ricky that question
By:
ramone
When: 29 Dec 09 10:33
Got one in the net. Nice catch.
By:
GOD .
When: 29 Dec 09 10:34
no fishing here, genuine questions - i just dont understand why they dont do it??
By:
STEPTOES YARD
When: 29 Dec 09 10:35
You try hitting those balls aim at yer throat with the new ball for 6 or 4
By:
STEPTOES YARD
When: 29 Dec 09 10:36
when batting at 11
By:
GOD .
When: 29 Dec 09 10:41
ok, not easy i know, but what downside is there to it?

Maybe an over of dot balls while you swing at it, may get lucky with a few 4's though?
By:
ramone
When: 29 Dec 09 10:44
2 in the net now, well done
By:
West Coast Eagles
When: 29 Dec 09 10:49
In Australia's case its about protecting averages.
By:
the butterfly collector
When: 29 Dec 09 11:04
10 an 11 usually your best bowlers an what happens if one of em gets injured whilst being bowled at
By:
GOD .
When: 29 Dec 09 11:38
in that case why bother going out on the field at all if you're worried about your bowlers getting injured?
By:
jsimpson67.
When: 29 Dec 09 11:45
it is a genuine question, one that no-one can answer, im sure strauss couldnt either if you asked him

not sure why they do it either, psychological perhaps? the only possibility
By:
West Coast Eagles
When: 29 Dec 09 11:59
yeah to protect averages i couldnt see a player like Shane Watson throwing away his innings at 120 not out, for some cheap runs.


Less so for tail ender batsman. I believe they wouldnt care too much. I agree if its a team game, probably one of the least selfish batsman in the 2000's to go and search for quick runs at the expense of his wicket, was Adam Gilchrist. Played the team game, in search for quick team runs before declaring.
By:
ramone
When: 29 Dec 09 13:42
Blow me down with a feather. He's got 5 now.
By:
the butterfly collector
When: 29 Dec 09 13:51
what you mean keep the bowlers in the dressing room all match.
hmm different but how you gonna bowl the other side out?
By:
Fantismo
When: 29 Dec 09 13:58
I agree with God here. Sportsman should remeber they are here to entertain as well as win and it would be very entertaining. I should think it has something to do with protecting their batting average.
Most tail enders would be out within a few balls hitting ouyt with the new ball. they shouldt be so precious.
By:
shergarburger
When: 29 Dec 09 14:11
7!
By:
someone who likes betting
When: 29 Dec 09 14:26
10 and 11 batsmen trying to slog everything will only score at about 4 or 5 an over, there will be a lot of playing and missing and mis-cued shots, the odd one may go for four but o balance it may be worth going in and if they don't have enough runs the top-order batsmen can get them next innings at a faster rate, should of declared when before Onions walked out imo
By:
cricketjon
When: 29 Dec 09 14:50
you might also lose on of your bowlers as we did with Gough in 1998, broke a finger batting

a new slant on the 4 or 5 bowler thread..
By:
far cough
When: 29 Dec 09 15:27
GOD could you answer a question that's been worrying me for some time? Do you exist?
By:
tuthoops
When: 29 Dec 09 15:41
i can answer that for you.

no
By:
Sterling Morrison
When: 29 Dec 09 21:34
I think it was a good idea
By:
Mud Man
When: 29 Dec 09 22:18
The declaration is looking better and better the more wickets that fall.
By:
smeagors
When: 29 Dec 09 22:51
what .. creating humankind ?
By:
Sterling Morrison
When: 29 Dec 09 22:54
JJust if you are going to spend an hour putting on a negligible amount of runs declare when Prior is out. Sad if not able to win from here.
By:
aston
When: 30 Dec 09 00:58
God! If your suggesting Struass should have batted for even longer your even madder than him. He should have declared at lunch at the very latest. With 170 lead and 5 sessions left Smith would still not have enough time to set up a declaration, especially at the rate they score and with weather around. Also I dont believe that declaring 9 down is that common and if he wanted to protect numbers 10 and 11 from injury he would have declared at the fall of the 9th wicket instead of after another 6 runs.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com