Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
crunchyfrog
12 Nov 09 11:10
Joined:
Date Joined: 04 Nov 05
| Topic/replies: 2,372 | Blogger: crunchyfrog's blog
Here we go then ...

1. England match wins 1.5
2. Smith series runs 222.5
3. Strauss series runs 177.5
4. KP series sixes 6.5
5. Prior series catches 6.5
6. Total series stumpings 9.5
7. Total series run-outs 9.5
8. Colly series wickets (i.e. Paul) 2.5
9. Jiminy series wickets (i.e. Anderson) 8.5
10. Steyn series wickets 12.5

Tiebreaker: Total series extras

Entries close 12:30 GMT Friday 20th November.
Good luck all :-)
Pause Switch to Standard View ★★★ SA v ENG; ODI...
Show More
Loading...
Report anyother November 16, 2009 9:47 AM GMT
1. England match wins 1.5 under
2. Smith series runs 222.5 over
3. Strauss series runs 177.5 over
4. KP series sixes 6.5 over
5. Prior series catches 6.5 over
6. Total series stumpings 9.5 under
7. Total series run-outs 9.5 over
8. Colly series wickets (i.e. Paul) 2.5 over
9. Jiminy series wickets (i.e. Anderson) 8.5 over
10. Steyn series wickets 12.5 under

Tiebreaker: Total series extras 156
Report TwoTonTed November 16, 2009 11:11 AM GMT
shocking presentation of the entry by spassky, almost warrants being voided :^0
Report anyother November 16, 2009 12:17 PM GMT
seconded .. :D
Report crunchyfrog November 16, 2009 12:38 PM GMT
Where do I find the rulebook then? :-)
Report the fink sisters November 16, 2009 12:39 PM GMT
1. England match wins 1.5 .................................UNDER
2. Smith series runs 222.5..................................UNDER
3. Strauss series runs 177.5...............................UNDER
4. KP series sixes 6.5.......................................OVER
5. Prior series catches 6.5.................................UNDER
6. Total series stumpings 9.5..............................UNDER
7. Total series run-outs 9.5...............................OVER
8. Colly series wickets (i.e. Paul) 2.5....................UNDER
9. Jiminy series wickets (i.e. Anderson) 8.5............UNDER
10. Steyn series wickets 12.5............................UNDER

Extras: 163
Report TwoTonTed November 16, 2009 12:46 PM GMT
ahem, Laws please crunchy :)
Report Hippoglossus Hippoglossus November 16, 2009 9:35 PM GMT
1. England match wins 1.5 .................................Under
2. Smith series runs 222.5..................................Over
3. Strauss series runs 177.5...............................Over
4. KP series sixes 6.5.......................................Under
5. Prior series catches 6.5.................................Over
6. Total series stumpings 9.5..............................Under
7. Total series run-outs 9.5...............................Under
8. Colly series wickets (i.e. Paul) 2.5....................Under
9. Jiminy series wickets (i.e. Anderson) 8.5............Under
10. Steyn series wickets 12.5............................Under

TieBreaker = 189
Report spassky November 18, 2009 1:35 AM GMT
Don't listen to the old has-been, crunchy. Ted ( X-( ) is really worried that I ( B-) ) am going to beat him AGAIN so he is resorting to underhand tactics :(

although in reality you might as well void my entry ..... I would still have about the same chance of winning :)

(and yes, my entry was a pitiful mess, sorry)
Report far cough November 18, 2009 5:13 AM GMT
do you have any albatross, crunchy?
Report crunchyfrog November 18, 2009 7:51 AM GMT
It's a fair cop, far cough, all out of albatross :-(
We might have spassky surprise by the end of the series though ;-)
Report Monty's Wonderbra November 18, 2009 8:47 AM GMT
1. England match wins 1.5 OVER
2. Smith series runs 222.5 OVER
3. Strauss series runs 177.5 UNDER
4. KP series sixes 6.5 UNDER
5. Prior series catches 6.5 OVER
6. Total series stumpings 9.5 UNDER
7. Total series run-outs 9.5 UNDER
8. Colly series wickets (i.e. Paul) 2.5 UNDER
9. Jiminy series wickets (i.e. Anderson) 8.5 OVER
10. Steyn series wickets 12.5 UNDER

Tiebreaker: Total series extras 232

Cheers and GL
Report macca69 November 18, 2009 9:10 AM GMT
1. England match wins 1.5 Under
2. Smith series runs 222.5 Under
3. Strauss series runs 177.5 Under
4. KP series sixes 6.5 Over
5. Prior series catches 6.5 Over
6. Total series stumpings 9.5 Under
7. Total series run-outs 9.5 Under
8. Colly series wickets (i.e. Paul) 2.5 Under
9. Jiminy series wickets (i.e. Anderson) 8.5 Over
10. Steyn series wickets 12.5 Under

Tiebreaker: Total series extras 140
Report spassky November 18, 2009 1:20 PM GMT
Not a simgle person has gone OVER on the stumpings, yet.
Next least favourite is currently Steyn wickets.
Most popular are Strauss Runs and Prior Catches with 24 out of 32 each.

I think we are seeing the "Power of Ted" at work here. Since Ted posted first everybody is scared to disagree with such a proven expert, and it has skewed the answers. In the future we might have to ask Ted not to post the correct answers until we have had a chance to look at the questions :D
Report radix November 18, 2009 5:58 PM GMT
Here we go then ...

1. England match wins .......Under
2. Smith series runs ............Over
3. Strauss series runs .........Over
4. KP series sixes.................Over
5. Prior series catches.........Over
6. Total series stumpings....Under
7. Total series run-outs.......Over
8. Colly series wickets (i.e. Paul).....Over
9. Jiminy series wickets (i.e. Anderson).....Under
10. Steyn series wickets...............Under

Tiebreaker: 157
Report scliffor November 18, 2009 6:42 PM GMT
1. England match wins 1.5 .................................OVER
2. Smith series runs 222.5..................................UNDER
3. Strauss series runs 177.5...............................OVER
4. KP series sixes 6.5.......................................OVER
5. Prior series catches 6.5.................................OVER
6. Total series stumpings 9.5..............................UNDER
7. Total series run-outs 9.5...............................UNDER
8. Colly series wickets (i.e. Paul) 2.5....................OVER
9. Jiminy series wickets (i.e. Anderson) 8.5............OVER
10. Steyn series wickets 12.5............................UNDER

Extras: 152
Report biggestKINGKONG November 19, 2009 11:03 AM GMT
1. England match wins 1.5 -under
2. Smith series runs 222.5 -under
3. Strauss series runs 177.5 -over
4. KP series sixes 6.5 -under
5. Prior series catches 6.5 -under
6. Total series stumpings 9.5 -under
7. Total series run-outs 9.5 -under
8. Colly series wickets (i.e. Paul) 2.5 -under
9. Jiminy series wickets (i.e. Anderson) 8.5 -under
10. Steyn series wickets 12.5 -under
Report biggestKINGKONG November 19, 2009 11:04 AM GMT
tie breaker- 111
Report mvuemba November 19, 2009 3:50 PM GMT
1. England match wins 1.5 - Under
2. Smith series runs 222.5 - Under
3. Strauss series runs 177.5 - Under
4. KP series sixes 6.5 - Under
5. Prior series catches 6.5 - Under
6. Total series stumpings 9.5 - Under
7. Total series run-outs 9.5 - Under
8. Colly series wickets (i.e. Paul) 2.5 - Over
9. Jiminy series wickets (i.e. Anderson) 8.5 - Under
10. Steyn series wickets 12.5 - Under

Extras 173
Report thetitan November 19, 2009 10:12 PM GMT
1. England match wins 1.5 OVER
2. Smith series runs 222.5 UNDER
3. Strauss series runs 177.5 UNDER
4. KP series sixes 6.5 UNDER
5. Prior series catches 6.5 UNDER
6. Total series stumpings 9.5 UNDER
7. Total series run-outs 9.5 UNDER
8. Colly series wickets (i.e. Paul) 2.5 UNDER
9. Jiminy series wickets (i.e. Anderson) 8.5 UNDER
10. Steyn series wickets 12.5 UNDER UNDER UNDER

Tiebreaker: Total series extras - 66

9 unders :0
Report spassky November 19, 2009 10:25 PM GMT
Mine was such a mess that I have decided to re-do it; just to make sure that it is clear :


1. England match wins 1.5 - Under
2. Smith series runs 222.5 - Under
3. Strauss series runs 177.5 - Under
4. KP series sixes 6.5 - Under
5. Prior series catches 6.5 - Under
6. Total series stumpings 9.5 - Under
7. Total series run-outs 9.5 - Under
8. Colly series wickets (i.e. Paul) 2.5 - Under
9. Jiminy series wickets (i.e. Anderson) 8.5 - Under
10. Steyn series wickets 12.5 - Under

extras 161
Report crunchyfrog November 19, 2009 10:29 PM GMT
Naughty naughty spassky, you can't change your selections :0
I'm afraid your second entry is void :|
Report spassky November 19, 2009 10:32 PM GMT
says who ? X-(

I'm the scorer and its already been tipexed out so I can't undo it, sorry :(

When do entries have to be in by, crunchy ? I am thinking of changing mine again, but I haven't decided yet :)

Let's ask Ted when he gets up. I am sure that he will agree with me ... he always does ;)
Report crunchyfrog November 19, 2009 10:38 PM GMT
TwoTonTed 21 Oct 22:31
only 1 entry per competitor ;)

:-)
Report spassky November 19, 2009 11:14 PM GMT
I only want ONE entry !!! I want it to be the last one that I submit before the deadlone.

Anyway, that was when Ted was in his "Communist" period. He's mellowed since then. You'll see, when he wakes up.
Report spassky November 20, 2009 11:09 AM GMT
LAST CALL FOR ENTRIES TO THE OVER / UNDER



(just to confirm .... my original entry must stand; can't change one's mind ....... you caught me, crunchy ........ Ted would have gone apesh1t when he finally woke up)
Report fundamentalist November 20, 2009 11:10 AM GMT
1. England match wins 1.5 UNDER
2. Smith series runs 222.5 UNDER
3. Strauss series runs 177.5 UNDER
4. KP series sixes 6.5 UNDER
5. Prior series catches 6.5 UNDER
6. Total series stumpings 9.5 UNDER
7. Total series run-outs 9.5 UNDER
8. Colly series wickets (i.e. Paul) 2.5 UNDER
9. Jiminy series wickets (i.e. Anderson) 8.5 UNDER
10. Steyn series wickets 12.5 UNDER

Tiebreaker: Total series extras - 79
Report Lix November 20, 2009 11:12 AM GMT
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Thats **ing!

BOOOOOO!!!!!
Report spassky November 20, 2009 11:13 AM GMT
and there we have it ..... the winning entry by fundamentalist.
LBW gave the same prediction days ago but his extras total was miles higher than yours, fundy.
Report TwoTonTed November 20, 2009 11:14 AM GMT
you crafty so-and-so fundy, wait till the game looks like a washout and then go unders on everything ]:)
Report TwoTonTed November 20, 2009 11:15 AM GMT
just going to look at the O/U Laws, have a feeling that there's a clause in there that invalidates entries after TV live coverage has commenced. ;)
Report fundamentalist November 20, 2009 11:17 AM GMT
i believe before the official start time of game 1 TTT ;)

i expect one or 2 will be overs anyway, though nice to see you getting the moans in early ;)
Report crunchyfrog November 20, 2009 2:16 PM GMT
This could be the first ever Under/Under comp :-(
Report anyother November 20, 2009 3:31 PM GMT
O/U laws .. are they the ckt forum equivalent of the Holy Grail .. ?:|
Report anyother November 20, 2009 3:33 PM GMT
and besides LAWS are made for the obedience of fools and for adaption by wise men .. :)
Report Lix November 20, 2009 4:03 PM GMT
Found anything about allocations for rained off games in that rule/law book of yours Ted? :)
Report brentford November 20, 2009 4:09 PM GMT
think the cut off is usually entry before the first ball bowled it isn't it ? ;\

I'll join Fundy on the unders as I was asleep at the deadline :p
Report richieboy44 November 20, 2009 5:38 PM GMT
right .... couldn't find appropriate thread , but I found a cracking bet that I'd like to share with my cricket forum friends ...
Spoilsports...( Boyles ) are laying South Africa series betting ...South Africa 4/11 which equates to 1.36363636...
What's so great about this ?? you might ask ...Well, I'll tell you... their rules really favour this bet cos they state clearly in their rules.... if a series ends in a tie, then bets are voided and stakes are refunded !!!!
Only way you can lose if England win at least 3 out of the 4 remaining ODi's ...not gonna happen is it ??? and even if you believe it will, it's possible to 'arb out ' all green by backing England and the tie accordingly ...
lovely juvly... have lumped on ...and I mean really filled me boots on this one :^0

GL with ur bets everyone
Report lbw November 20, 2009 6:11 PM GMT
very good richie boy, also believe that the series prices are interesting on betfair eg I make England around 10-1 to win 3 of the remaining 4 games reqd to win the series including factoring in the momentum they would gain if they are better than we think they are and the chance of another washout (unlikely on sunday).
Report crunchyfrog November 21, 2009 10:22 AM GMT
Entries have closed but I have a cunning plan! This may be a tad controversial, but here are the revised targets usung the Duckworth-Lewis method :-)

1. England match wins 1.5
2. Smith series runs 177.5
3. Strauss series runs 142.5
4. KP series sixes 4.5
5. Prior series catches 5.5
6. Total series stumpings 5.5 ;-)
7. Total series run-outs 6.5
8. Colly series wickets (i.e. Paul) 2.5
9. Jiminy series wickets (i.e. Anderson) 6.5
10. Steyn series wickets 9.5

Tiebreaker: Total series extras will be scaled up accordingly
:p
Report anyother November 21, 2009 10:29 AM GMT
:0 :0 :0 .. wheres ted and his book of O/U Laws ?:|
Report thetitan November 21, 2009 10:34 AM GMT
cant be having this i'm afraid, washed out games havent affected O/U comps previously.
Report lbw November 21, 2009 10:50 AM GMT
no, can't have it. Weather is a part of the game
Report spassky November 21, 2009 11:48 AM GMT
Absolute poppycock, what. You've disgraced yourself here, crunchy, my boy. You'll be leaving the crusts on the cucumber sandwiches next. Whatever came over you ? Feeling a bit que4r, were you?

Can't be tinkering with the format, old boy. Best get along now, what ?
Report richieboy44 November 21, 2009 11:51 AM GMT
well,if there is a new overs/unders comp for the remaining 4 matches I put up ....


1. England match wins 1.5 UNDER
2. Smith series runs 177.5 OVER
3. Strauss series runs 142.5 OVER
4. KP series sixes 4.5 UNDER
5. Prior series catches 5.5 UNDER
6. Total series stumpings 5.5 WAAAYYY UNDER
7. Total series run-outs 6.5 UNDER
8. Colly series wickets (i.e. Paul) 2.5 UNDER
9. Jiminy series wickets (i.e. Anderson) 6.5 UNDER
10. Steyn series wickets 9.5 UNDER

series extras 144


but normally , it's not allowed to change the original entries ,,..remember early start 2 morrow
Report spassky November 21, 2009 11:55 AM GMT
Infamy.

They've all got it in for the scorer.
Report crunchyfrog November 21, 2009 12:28 PM GMT
No, no, richieboy44, the original Over/Under selections still stand, I've just altered the targets to be fairer. ;\
Report anyother November 21, 2009 4:19 PM GMT
anarchy on the ckt forum
Report richieboy44 November 21, 2009 4:20 PM GMT
ok , I see , the targets have been altered
Report lbw November 21, 2009 6:20 PM GMT
moving the goal posts?? can't do that. last over/under comp i enter into if that happens.. weather is part of cricket. back the draw in a test match, watch it rain, you don't get your even money shot re-booked at 1.50 do you?
Report lbw November 21, 2009 6:21 PM GMT
and yes ... I'm under everything
Report anyother November 21, 2009 6:42 PM GMT
i think that the only fair decision here must come from the creator of the now legendary***OVERS/UNDERS COMP*** .. i'm not sure but i think it was the the big fella ? .. ((( :) )))
Report bigjoe November 22, 2009 2:45 PM GMT
indeed it was my creation anyother B-) ... and as the founding farther is say lets not desicrate the competition :( ....i say let it run unchanged :)
Report crunchyfrog November 22, 2009 3:20 PM GMT
Current totals after match "two"

1. England match wins ... 1
2. Smith series runs ... 12
3. Strauss series runs ... 16
4. KP series sixes ... 0
5. Prior series catches ... 2
6. Total series stumpings ... 0
7. Total series run-outs ... 0
8. Colly series wickets (i.e. Paul) ... 2
9. Jiminy series wickets (i.e. Anderson) ... 3
10. Steyn series wickets ... 0

Tiebreaker: Total series extras ... 23
Report TwoTonTed November 23, 2009 5:09 PM GMT
OMFG - just catching up on this (looks like I'm doomed already).

Can't be changing the goalposts (stumps if you prefer) crunchy ;) :|
Report brentford November 23, 2009 6:14 PM GMT
unless it's an asuuie spinner eh Ted ? ;) :0
Report brentford November 23, 2009 6:15 PM GMT
*grrr* aussie spinner was the phrase.
Report crunchyfrog November 27, 2009 7:15 PM GMT
Current totals after match "three"

1. England match wins ... 1
2. Smith series runs ... 66
3. Strauss series runs ... 40
4. KP series sixes ... 1
5. Prior series catches ... 3
6. Total series stumpings ... 0
7. Total series run-outs ... 0
8. Colly series wickets (i.e. Paul) ... 2
9. Jiminy series wickets (i.e. Anderson) ... 3
10. Steyn series wickets ... 0

Tiebreaker: Total series extras ... 51
Report Lix November 27, 2009 9:17 PM GMT
I trust we're all cheering on mass 'overs' to thwart the **ing latecomers?

Not a great day for any of em though... :(
Report brentford November 27, 2009 9:21 PM GMT
my federation ( Green Beard and Boh Dream team for ENGLAND - U know it makes sense) apparently withdrew my entry -
without my consent ( sounds disturbingly familiar).
Report fundamentalist November 27, 2009 9:29 PM GMT
assume you have your match odds bets 24 hours in advance too eh Lix ;)
Report anyother November 27, 2009 10:36 PM GMT
:p
Report anyother November 27, 2009 11:01 PM GMT
by the way .. loophole **s never prosper ;)
Report ronsk November 29, 2009 9:13 AM GMT
Colly wickets settled OVER
Report anyother November 29, 2009 10:57 AM GMT
1) looks like GSM as an over
Report anyother November 29, 2009 11:06 AM GMT
1) = over
2) = under
3) = ?
4) = under
5) = over
6) = under
7) = under
8) =over
9) = over
10) = under

thats how i see the comp finishing apart from strauss runs which could go either way .. imo
Report anyother November 29, 2009 11:10 AM GMT
and after a quick look i'd say its gonna be between top tier .. lastchance and schliffor for the honours
Report anyother November 29, 2009 11:14 AM GMT
another quick look and i reckon if 3 goes over then lastchance and schliffor would tie on 9
Report crunchyfrog November 29, 2009 2:09 PM GMT
Current totals after match "four"

1. England match wins ... 2
2. Smith series runs ... 68
3. Strauss series runs ... 72
4. KP series sixes ... 1
5. Prior series catches ... 5
6. Total series stumpings ... 0
7. Total series run-outs ... 0
8. Colly series wickets (i.e. Paul) ... 4
9. Jiminy series wickets (i.e. Anderson) ... 8
10. Steyn series wickets ... 0

Tiebreaker: Total series extras ... 60
Report spassky November 29, 2009 2:27 PM GMT
Well I disagree with smeagols analysis ...
I have richieboy and mvuemba and theTitan as the leaders in the clubhouse, with Prior needing one catch, and Jimmy needing one wicket as the two results which could bring lbw/MrMoustache/rockmonkey/maxandpaddy/ronsk/badsworth/BEND/lastchance/Monty... or fundamentalist into the reckoning.

MUCH MUCH more important is what is happening at the bottom end :
if Jimmy does NOT get another wicket, then marychain1 is favourite for the wooden spoon ........
BUT ..............
IF jimmy gets another wicket TWOTONTED could well be wooden spoonist.

It's obviously sad to see a self-proclaimed over/under legend slide from mediocrity to such a level. Let's hope he sees the sense of retiring from top level over/undering, so that we can we remember him as he was, rather than the bumbling wreck that he has become. :(
I hope that forumites will join me in wishing the old boy well. :x
Report spassky November 29, 2009 2:29 PM GMT
*prior needs TWO catches
Report anyother November 29, 2009 2:30 PM GMT
spassky i refer to winners if it pans out as i see it
Report spassky November 29, 2009 2:44 PM GMT
I understand, smeags, but strauss needs 106 runs for your nominations to be the leaders.
I think shroodies would prefer to back my nominated leaders.

Much much much more important ........ Ted for wooden spoon ....... Mrs Spassky had better watch out if that happens :D
Report anyother November 29, 2009 2:47 PM GMT
thats exciting news about TTT tho spassks .. new underpants for you methinks ;)
Report anyother November 29, 2009 2:50 PM GMT
altho having had a look i'm in the running for my 2nd wooden spoon :_|
Report spassky November 29, 2009 3:00 PM GMT
LOL .... yes, I was sparing you and radix the embarassment of being highlighted as having as p1sspoor a score as Ted !!

On the plus side, you can't get the wooden spoon because marychain cannot catch you no matter what.
He/she can only catch Ted or radix.
Report Green Beard November 29, 2009 3:32 PM GMT
whoever knows nfl

you dont think ravens ae henously short at 1.3 do you? think it should be 1.6 or so . . .
Report anyother November 29, 2009 4:44 PM GMT
GB .. start a thread mate ..
Report TwoTonTed November 29, 2009 4:46 PM GMT
if I get the wooden spoon I'll resign from the forum :(
Report anyother November 29, 2009 4:48 PM GMT
is that a bj resignation type thing ted
Report TwoTonTed November 29, 2009 4:52 PM GMT
tbd smeagers :)
Report anyother November 29, 2009 5:17 PM GMT
to be defferred ?
Report Lix December 4, 2009 2:33 PM GMT
Void this comp please .... :D
Report fundamentalist December 4, 2009 2:37 PM GMT
looks like the winner is band imo ;)
Report crunchyfrog December 4, 2009 2:53 PM GMT
9 thetitan (66) :-)
9 mvuemba (173)

8 fundamentalist
8 spassky_2
8 lbw

7 biggestKINGKONG
7 RockMonkey
7 Max and Paddy
7 richieboy44
7 BEND
7 A treeeemendous machiiine
7 Badsworth
7 ronsk
7 Girls aloud lezzer scrum
7 Mr. Moustache

6 scliffor
6 spassky_1
6 the fink sisters
6 dougydougy
6 STEPTOES YARD
6 Lies, DamnLies, and Statistics
6 lastchance
6 Monty's Wonderbra

5 SonofDunc
5 macca69
5 Lix
5 Hippoglossus Hippoglossus
5 BadBeat
5 TopTier
5 Green Beard

4 radix
4 Damsel
4 bigjoe
4 couple
4 TwoTonTed

3 lambers1
3 anyother

2 marychain1 :-(

Subject to official ratification!
Report STEPTOES YARD December 4, 2009 3:08 PM GMT
A hollow victory imo :(

Betfair likely to void this
Report Green Beard December 4, 2009 3:24 PM GMT
why have i been placed at the bottom of the 5's? :_|
Report spassky December 4, 2009 3:56 PM GMT
Excellent job, crunchy : set the questions and definitive table as soon as the series is over. :x

The top four were also the last four to submit, when the weather was known, so top-bombing to lbw who was the second person to submit.

bigjoe was jostling with Ted to get on the wooden losers podium, but smeagol and lambers held them off. Congrats to marychain, for possibly the most incompetent entry ever recorded :D
Report lbw December 4, 2009 4:06 PM GMT
thx for top bombing spass
I'll accept another podium finish and move on...
Report TwoTonTed December 4, 2009 4:43 PM GMT
TwoTonTed 29 Nov 17:46
if I get the wooden spoon I'll resign from the forum :(


Sorry folks but looks like I get to live another day ;\

Well done crunchy :)
Report bigjoe December 4, 2009 4:55 PM GMT
Well done to the winners ... wel done to those that denied me wooden spoon too :D
Report crunchyfrog December 4, 2009 5:43 PM GMT
Oops, sorry Green Beard! You've gained one place :-)

5 SonofDunc (125)
5 macca69 (140)
5 Lix (167)
5 Hippoglossus Hippoglossus (189)
5 BadBeat (195)
5 Green Beard (196)
5 TopTier (199)
Report crunchyfrog December 4, 2009 5:46 PM GMT
And technically speaking, so does anyother! :-)

3 anyother (156)
3 lambers1 (206)
Report Titan's Chlamydia Green Light December 4, 2009 6:06 PM GMT
I still got it :D (not the clam, btw)
Report smeagors December 4, 2009 6:22 PM GMT
jesuz i'm sheeeeeeeeet at these ((((( :0 )))))
Report Green Beard December 4, 2009 6:25 PM GMT
BOOOOMMMMMMM!!!!!

thanks crunchy
Report Lix December 4, 2009 6:32 PM GMT
Better get the new unders/overs comp in for the SA-Eng test series quick Tites before you get BAND again. :D
Report smeagors December 4, 2009 7:25 PM GMT
mmm .. clam sauce'n'pasta ..
Report Titan's Chlamydia Green Light December 4, 2009 7:38 PM GMT
will do so next week lix, got a few oddball ones up my sleeve too :D
Report smeagors December 4, 2009 7:45 PM GMT
ya don't say :D
Report brentford December 4, 2009 7:57 PM GMT
got a few oddball ones up my sleeve too

think we'll struggle for clarification on the over/under std count of squad players tbh....
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com