Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
TwoTonTed
05 Nov 09 17:16
Joined:
Date Joined: 15 Jul 04
| Topic/replies: 12,135 | Blogger: TwoTonTed's blog
I've got a brill idea and one which I am thinking of taking to the Powers that Be i/c the Laws of the game. Not sure whether I go to the MCC, the ICC or the BCCI should anyone know?

Anyway, I'll let you into my little secret. Since T20 is very much here to stay I think it would be of benefit to the longer forms of the game if the Laws were tweaked to increase the entertainment value of popgun cricket and to differentiate it from the propper stuff.

What you do is simple(s): On the fall of the 10th wicket, the last man standing is permitted to bat on until either he is out or the game is concluded (whichever lasts longer). However, he would be foolish to take a single since the bowler would have an empty end to bowl at. That would be highly entertaining in itself should the batter be stupid enuf to take a single; imagine Mugaf Patel or whoever missing the stumps on the said delivery and the remaining batsman scampering a single whilst the keeper muffs it up :^0

He would therefore be advised to take 2s or hit boundaries. At the end of the over, he is permitted to take strike from the other end etc etc. Very close games could become hillarious :D

So, what do you think fellas? Should I take the idea further with the Big Cheeses i/c the Laws? :)
Pause Switch to Standard View **T20 Law Change**
Show More
Loading...
Report Innocent Bystander November 5, 2009 5:24 PM GMT
No - next ;)
Report BEND November 5, 2009 6:35 PM GMT
Like it ted.

slight tweak tho, ;-) if no single is scored off the last ball of the over, then bowler (next over) has a free ball to hit the wicket. (opposite to the free hit)

if they miss, then the batsman can cross for no run for the remaining 5 balls of the over.
Report bombaclart November 5, 2009 6:38 PM GMT
it's not bad ted but why don't you suggest that on last wicket, the batsman and the bowler rip the 3 stumps out from each end and knock seven sacks of shyte out of each other.

last man standing gets 4 runs...or the wicket.
Report Lori November 5, 2009 7:54 PM GMT
Yeah I like it
Report Innocent Bystander November 5, 2009 7:55 PM GMT
Works for me
Report TwoTonTed November 5, 2009 9:06 PM GMT
BEND. good suggested revision :)

I'll ignore bomba's rediciculous proposition :D
Report Deadly Earnest November 5, 2009 10:04 PM GMT
We played similar rules when I was a kid in the schoolyard Ted, only you could run singles then walk back. We referred to it as 'last man gets his tucker.' Ahhh...memories. :)
Report Lies, DamnLies, and Statistics November 5, 2009 10:54 PM GMT
did the poms not have last man's tucker??
Report thetitan November 5, 2009 11:00 PM GMT
what woudl be more pertinent is if they applied this rule in 'handicap' matches...eg aus vs netherlands...england vs...oh, wait :^0
Report TopTier November 6, 2009 8:38 PM GMT
Double the runs if you score off your helmet. Would make entertaining viewing with a head on bat stance looking for 16 off the last over.
Report LuisGarcia November 6, 2009 9:37 PM GMT
and triple runs off the box
Report far cough November 7, 2009 8:25 AM GMT
if you survive a third umpire decision you have to face the next ball blindfold. tcrowd would luvvit.
Report EUGENE KRABS November 7, 2009 8:53 AM GMT
I have two suggestions;

1 Every time an umpire makes a howler they have to remove an article of clothing.

2 Mandatory introduction of lady umpires at all games
Report bigjoe November 7, 2009 12:37 PM GMT
i got a better idea.. do away with powerplay overs :0 .. instead, for those overs, bowlers only have one stump to bowl at :D
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com