<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Question for Cricket aficionados</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/31880141/question-for-cricket-aficionados</link><description>It seems to me that in the past it was allowed to have a 'runner' for an injured batsman. Is this not the case now?ps I refuse to call them 'batters'!</description><item><title>Rog, it always used to be that runners were allowed but the ICC abolished this rule in 2011, due i believe to  to some teams/players taking the pee. That is to say the batsman in question who requested a runner may not have been as indisposed as was</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/31880141/question-for-cricket-aficionados?post_id=564874431#564874431</link><description>Rog, it always used to be that runners were allowed but the ICC abolished this rule in 2011, due i believe to  to some teams/players taking the pee. That is to say the batsman in question who requested a runner may not have been as indisposed as was</description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 16:02:08 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>It seems to me that in the past it was allowed to have a 'runner' for an injured batsman. Is this not the case now?ps I refuse to call them 'batters'!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/31880141/question-for-cricket-aficionados?post_id=564874213#564874213</link><description>It seems to me that in the past it was allowed to have a 'runner' for an injured batsman. Is this not the case now?ps I refuse to call them 'batters'!</description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 14:32:37 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
