<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: T20 WC - South Africa v WIndies</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/30670591/t20-wc---south-africa-v-windies</link><description>Like some others, I fancied WI early, and their combination of big hitters and sharp spinners looks a difficult combination to beat in Indian conditions and Nagpur in particular. If WI bat first, I'll back them and not look to trade. Same if SAF bat</description><item><title>As mentioned above and alluded to on England SL thread, I wasn't loving the wickets to totally unnecessary shots when extremely well placed but you can't go getting too agitated about a mere grand.  I lose more than that on football all the time and</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/30670591/t20-wc---south-africa-v-windies?post_id=548205093#548205093</link><description>As mentioned above and alluded to on England SL thread, I wasn't loving the wickets to totally unnecessary shots when extremely well placed but you can't go getting too agitated about a mere grand.  I lose more than that on football all the time and</description><pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2016 14:18:30 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>You must have been having kittens FS. It looked a cakewalk at one stage</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/30670591/t20-wc---south-africa-v-windies?post_id=548197949#548197949</link><description>You must have been having kittens FS. It looked a cakewalk at one stage</description><pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2016 03:19:51 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>There was a lot of panic. Prices were all over the shop with SA becoming favourite with 20 needed off 2 then going up to over 4s I think before Samuels being out put them back to about 2.3, favoured again with the dot first ball of the last over then</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/30670591/t20-wc---south-africa-v-windies?post_id=548197913#548197913</link><description>There was a lot of panic. Prices were all over the shop with SA becoming favourite with 20 needed off 2 then going up to over 4s I think before Samuels being out put them back to about 2.3, favoured again with the dot first ball of the last over then</description><pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2016 03:07:03 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I fell asleep and missed the end. Must have been some real panic in the market</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/30670591/t20-wc---south-africa-v-windies?post_id=548196441#548196441</link><description>I fell asleep and missed the end. Must have been some real panic in the market</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:28:59 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>He's also a pretty indifferent bowler who's done little with the bat in international cricket in ages.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/30670591/t20-wc---south-africa-v-windies?post_id=548193645#548193645</link><description>He's also a pretty indifferent bowler who's done little with the bat in international cricket in ages.</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2016 15:23:20 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Oh sorry, didn't know.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/30670591/t20-wc---south-africa-v-windies?post_id=548192697#548192697</link><description>Oh sorry, didn't know.</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2016 13:57:48 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>JP was injured.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/30670591/t20-wc---south-africa-v-windies?post_id=548192663#548192663</link><description>JP was injured.</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2016 13:50:57 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Our reluctance to pick Tredwell and play Dawson will bite us.The Saffers have that mental block too. JP instead of one of Weiss or Morris would have won that match.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/30670591/t20-wc---south-africa-v-windies?post_id=548192429#548192429</link><description>Our reluctance to pick Tredwell and play Dawson will bite us.The Saffers have that mental block too. JP instead of one of Weiss or Morris would have won that match.</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2016 13:21:25 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>You don't need to be a great team to win it. England should make the semis and it's then two shoot outs in a pretty random format.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/30670591/t20-wc---south-africa-v-windies?post_id=548192377#548192377</link><description>You don't need to be a great team to win it. England should make the semis and it's then two shoot outs in a pretty random format.</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2016 13:16:37 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Could well be:England v NZWindies v India (or God forbid Aussies!)I'd fancy India and NZ.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/30670591/t20-wc---south-africa-v-windies?post_id=548192349#548192349</link><description>Could well be:England v NZWindies v India (or God forbid Aussies!)I'd fancy India and NZ.</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2016 13:12:32 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
