<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: kent vs lanchashire 20 20</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/30571015/kent-vs-lanchashire-20-20</link><description>lanchashire win?</description><item><title>We all watch a lot of IPL and the call of Thai goes out all the time when there is a close game. I'd be peed off too but there seems to be a lot of whingeing going on about this adjudication.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/30571015/kent-vs-lanchashire-20-20?post_id=545911067#545911067</link><description>We all watch a lot of IPL and the call of Thai goes out all the time when there is a close game. I'd be peed off too but there seems to be a lot of whingeing going on about this adjudication.</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:46:13 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I rarely bet on this 20/20 stuff but had &Acirc;&pound;100 on Lancs at 1.13 and thought I had blown it when Buttler got himself out. Was quite relieved to get away unscathed. I was always sure a tie would be a void bet and that was a tie.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/30571015/kent-vs-lanchashire-20-20?post_id=545902703#545902703</link><description>I rarely bet on this 20/20 stuff but had &Acirc;&pound;100 on Lancs at 1.13 and thought I had blown it when Buttler got himself out. Was quite relieved to get away unscathed. I was always sure a tie would be a void bet and that was a tie.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:02:32 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>this is the biggest nonsense in betting The match has not been tied so anyone betting on a tied match should not have wonWill the match end with the scores tiedThe amount of runs scored were level but Lancs won by losing fewer wickets so the scores w</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/30571015/kent-vs-lanchashire-20-20?post_id=545898375#545898375</link><description>this is the biggest nonsense in betting The match has not been tied so anyone betting on a tied match should not have wonWill the match end with the scores tiedThe amount of runs scored were level but Lancs won by losing fewer wickets so the scores w</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 04:42:40 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Just woke up to this ffs</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/30571015/kent-vs-lanchashire-20-20?post_id=545877365#545877365</link><description>Just woke up to this ffs</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2015 19:54:18 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>"Please note there is a separate Tied Match market available for this game."</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/30571015/kent-vs-lanchashire-20-20?post_id=545874191#545874191</link><description>"Please note there is a separate Tied Match market available for this game."</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2015 13:13:49 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Forgot this bit for the Match Odds market:"If scores (including a derived target score using the Duckworth Lewis method) are deemed tied at the completion of both innings then all bets on the Match Odds market will be void."</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/30571015/kent-vs-lanchashire-20-20?post_id=545873907#545873907</link><description>Forgot this bit for the Match Odds market:"If scores (including a derived target score using the Duckworth Lewis method) are deemed tied at the completion of both innings then all bets on the Match Odds market will be void."</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2015 12:40:39 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>From the market rules: "For the avoidance of doubt, if scores are tied at the completion of both innings then any tie breaker that may be used to determine a winner including, but not limited to, bowl outs, Super Overs, one-over eliminators, losing f</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/30571015/kent-vs-lanchashire-20-20?post_id=545873777#545873777</link><description>From the market rules: "For the avoidance of doubt, if scores are tied at the completion of both innings then any tie breaker that may be used to determine a winner including, but not limited to, bowl outs, Super Overs, one-over eliminators, losing f</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2015 12:31:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>What im really trying to say is you were backing a 1000/1 shot atodds of probably around 6/1-10/1 good work laying if you can get it</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/30571015/kent-vs-lanchashire-20-20?post_id=545873629#545873629</link><description>What im really trying to say is you were backing a 1000/1 shot atodds of probably around 6/1-10/1 good work laying if you can get it</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2015 12:12:13 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>What about if they both lost same amount of wickets and tied on runs scored? Would there have been a super over then?could not happen with i think 5 balls to go so on the layers of super over could win SUppose its like backing 0-0 when score already</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/30571015/kent-vs-lanchashire-20-20?post_id=545873577#545873577</link><description>What about if they both lost same amount of wickets and tied on runs scored? Would there have been a super over then?could not happen with i think 5 balls to go so on the layers of super over could win SUppose its like backing 0-0 when score already</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2015 12:06:21 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>then will be most 6, then most 4, etc</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/30571015/kent-vs-lanchashire-20-20?post_id=545873377#545873377</link><description>then will be most 6, then most 4, etc</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:48:56 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
