<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: South Africa v That Place They Keep All The Sheep</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29744515/south-africa-v-that-place-they-keep-all-the-sheep</link><description>SA to short here? 1.37...</description><item><title>Nice tale Lanza...</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29744515/south-africa-v-that-place-they-keep-all-the-sheep?post_id=528603487#528603487</link><description>Nice tale Lanza...</description><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 03:32:53 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Cheers, guys</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29744515/south-africa-v-that-place-they-keep-all-the-sheep?post_id=528543033#528543033</link><description>Cheers, guys</description><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 15:23:29 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>fluctuated loads, think lowest NZ went before the ball was bowled was about 1.48ish briefly</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29744515/south-africa-v-that-place-they-keep-all-the-sheep?post_id=528532527#528532527</link><description>fluctuated loads, think lowest NZ went before the ball was bowled was about 1.48ish briefly</description><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 09:25:32 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>think it was something like 2.4 South Africa / 1.68 NZ ?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29744515/south-africa-v-that-place-they-keep-all-the-sheep?post_id=528517095#528517095</link><description>think it was something like 2.4 South Africa / 1.68 NZ ?</description><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 17:07:44 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Could somebody please tell me the odds before the final ball (three runs were needed to win, two for the tie).Many thanks.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29744515/south-africa-v-that-place-they-keep-all-the-sheep?post_id=528514205#528514205</link><description>Could somebody please tell me the odds before the final ball (three runs were needed to win, two for the tie).Many thanks.</description><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 14:57:09 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>in my one and only game of cricket...a t20 match played on the oval, i got hit for 6 off the last ball when the opps needed 4to win off the last ball....  I was gutted.g.Hick had just retired 25* not out 4 balls into the over, next ball i took my fir</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29744515/south-africa-v-that-place-they-keep-all-the-sheep?post_id=528504653#528504653</link><description>in my one and only game of cricket...a t20 match played on the oval, i got hit for 6 off the last ball when the opps needed 4to win off the last ball....  I was gutted.g.Hick had just retired 25* not out 4 balls into the over, next ball i took my fir</description><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 08:58:25 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>A straight up bouncer not wide would have been my choice. Thats sport folks.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29744515/south-africa-v-that-place-they-keep-all-the-sheep?post_id=528495875#528495875</link><description>A straight up bouncer not wide would have been my choice. Thats sport folks.</description><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 02:34:01 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>i don't think it was the best ball he could have bowled given that south africa realistically needed a boundary to win. a full wide yorker or a wide slower ball bouncer would have been better imho, but it wasn't a terrible idea: you're expecting it t</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29744515/south-africa-v-that-place-they-keep-all-the-sheep?post_id=528494565#528494565</link><description>i don't think it was the best ball he could have bowled given that south africa realistically needed a boundary to win. a full wide yorker or a wide slower ball bouncer would have been better imho, but it wasn't a terrible idea: you're expecting it t</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 23:34:21 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>a 6 coming off it isn't any different to a 4 though is it in this situation? it's not relevant whether it goes for a 4 or 6. just because a ball goes for 6 that doesn't mean it's a bad ball. a back of a length ball was the right-decision there, it ju</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29744515/south-africa-v-that-place-they-keep-all-the-sheep?post_id=528485471#528485471</link><description>a 6 coming off it isn't any different to a 4 though is it in this situation? it's not relevant whether it goes for a 4 or 6. just because a ball goes for 6 that doesn't mean it's a bad ball. a back of a length ball was the right-decision there, it ju</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:16:44 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>cnman - ur talking nonsense.  No one is slating him for his previous plays.  The last BALL was BRUTAL.  Fook sake man a 6 came of it.  How is that NOT a bad bowl? Pleae explain how it could not have been a bad bowl when a boundary comes of it.  I won</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29744515/south-africa-v-that-place-they-keep-all-the-sheep?post_id=528484875#528484875</link><description>cnman - ur talking nonsense.  No one is slating him for his previous plays.  The last BALL was BRUTAL.  Fook sake man a 6 came of it.  How is that NOT a bad bowl? Pleae explain how it could not have been a bad bowl when a boundary comes of it.  I won</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:01:35 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
