<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Essex v Lancs - Lancs 10/11</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29336645/essex-v-lancs---lancs-1011</link><description>Lancs @ 10/11 no bees on the betfair fixed odds site ;-)</description><item><title>Goodness me, trying to get themselves out playing shots like that!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29336645/essex-v-lancs---lancs-1011?post_id=523355677#523355677</link><description>Goodness me, trying to get themselves out playing shots like that!</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:45:15 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>6</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29336645/essex-v-lancs---lancs-1011?post_id=523355623#523355623</link><description>6</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:44:17 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>true</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29336645/essex-v-lancs---lancs-1011?post_id=523355463#523355463</link><description>true</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:41:08 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>faster on the radio.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29336645/essex-v-lancs---lancs-1011?post_id=523355395#523355395</link><description>faster on the radio.</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:39:35 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>watch the sky feed then</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29336645/essex-v-lancs---lancs-1011?post_id=523355383#523355383</link><description>watch the sky feed then</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:39:19 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The Essex commentators are annoying. One, the younger commentator, is competent. The older commentator just say 'yes, youre right' or 'yes, as you said' or 'no, you're wrong' or 'no, I don't think that is correct'. Very patronising to his co-commenta</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29336645/essex-v-lancs---lancs-1011?post_id=523355353#523355353</link><description>The Essex commentators are annoying. One, the younger commentator, is competent. The older commentator just say 'yes, youre right' or 'yes, as you said' or 'no, you're wrong' or 'no, I don't think that is correct'. Very patronising to his co-commenta</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:38:48 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>yeah but pressure of needing to score nearly a run a ball will often bring wickets when you're facing someone as good as Harbhajan</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29336645/essex-v-lancs---lancs-1011?post_id=523355341#523355341</link><description>yeah but pressure of needing to score nearly a run a ball will often bring wickets when you're facing someone as good as Harbhajan</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:38:30 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>that is nothing. The wickets are far more important.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29336645/essex-v-lancs---lancs-1011?post_id=523355255#523355255</link><description>that is nothing. The wickets are far more important.</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:36:53 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>they sort of are now SoA. up to 5.25 an over required, if they lost a wicket now that'd be a problem. Don't want to be chasing 70 off the last 10 really with their tail</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29336645/essex-v-lancs---lancs-1011?post_id=523355247#523355247</link><description>they sort of are now SoA. up to 5.25 an over required, if they lost a wicket now that'd be a problem. Don't want to be chasing 70 off the last 10 really with their tail</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:36:39 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>that's because they are</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29336645/essex-v-lancs---lancs-1011?post_id=523355229#523355229</link><description>that's because they are</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:36:13 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
