<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Lancashire vs Notts</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29216181/lancashire-vs-notts</link><description>Didnt see a thread for this game..so here goes.</description><item><title>d/l not updated for teams to hammer the bal; round nowadays, even in 50 ovs 100 off last 10 is common place. whent the system was devised 70was a good effort.good system but b=needs tweaking for t20 and 50 ovs</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29216181/lancashire-vs-notts?post_id=521532349#521532349</link><description>d/l not updated for teams to hammer the bal; round nowadays, even in 50 ovs 100 off last 10 is common place. whent the system was devised 70was a good effort.good system but b=needs tweaking for t20 and 50 ovs</description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 04:56:34 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>definitely easier though SY - as the market movement showed.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29216181/lancashire-vs-notts?post_id=521523535#521523535</link><description>definitely easier though SY - as the market movement showed.</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 17:21:14 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>short game didnt help lancs that said reckon in those conditions notts would have fancied chasing 178</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29216181/lancashire-vs-notts?post_id=521522653#521522653</link><description>short game didnt help lancs that said reckon in those conditions notts would have fancied chasing 178</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 16:46:52 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>nailed it DStyle.  Works well for 50 over cricket, not T20</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29216181/lancashire-vs-notts?post_id=521522639#521522639</link><description>nailed it DStyle.  Works well for 50 over cricket, not T20</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 16:46:39 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>the problem with D/L for T20s for very short run chases is as follows:top order batsman have a much greater scoring potential than those lower down the order.this is factored in the resources calculation used by D/L but as the overs remaining gets do</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29216181/lancashire-vs-notts?post_id=521521521#521521521</link><description>the problem with D/L for T20s for very short run chases is as follows:top order batsman have a much greater scoring potential than those lower down the order.this is factored in the resources calculation used by D/L but as the overs remaining gets do</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 16:10:25 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Anyway, Forrest Gump starts in 10 mins on sky1.Superb</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29216181/lancashire-vs-notts?post_id=521520957#521520957</link><description>Anyway, Forrest Gump starts in 10 mins on sky1.Superb</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 15:52:29 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>a really great way to actually work this stuff out would be to look at the betfair odds across a season to see when it gets out of kilter.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29216181/lancashire-vs-notts?post_id=521520951#521520951</link><description>a really great way to actually work this stuff out would be to look at the betfair odds across a season to see when it gets out of kilter.</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 15:52:28 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Duckworth and Lewis should be shot!! Should never be used for 20/20</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29216181/lancashire-vs-notts?post_id=521520947#521520947</link><description>Duckworth and Lewis should be shot!! Should never be used for 20/20</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 15:52:25 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Yeah, D/L still favours the batting team in really reduced chases.Lancs were odds on before the rain and when they came back on were 2.7. Needs adjusting when reduced to a slog, more in favour of the bowling side.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29216181/lancashire-vs-notts?post_id=521520775#521520775</link><description>Yeah, D/L still favours the batting team in really reduced chases.Lancs were odds on before the rain and when they came back on were 2.7. Needs adjusting when reduced to a slog, more in favour of the bowling side.</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 15:48:08 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I think authorities are under pressure to complete matches due to gate receipts and keeping crowd interested/coming back</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cricket/go/thread/view/94046/29216181/lancashire-vs-notts?post_id=521520627#521520627</link><description>I think authorities are under pressure to complete matches due to gate receipts and keeping crowd interested/coming back</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 15:44:33 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
