Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
20 Jul 19
00:49
Joined:
Date Joined:
24 Aug 11
Prince Charles is warning that there are only 35 years left to save the planet from climate disaster, which represents a 33-year extension of his previous deadline.
In March 2009, the heir to the British throne predicted that the world had 100 months “before we risk catastrophic climate change,”
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jul/28/prince-charles-extends-climate-doomsday-deadline/
Spreads are not his forte........Lay 33 years....Pro Tip.....easy money..
In March 2009, the heir to the British throne predicted that the world had 100 months “before we risk catastrophic climate change,”
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jul/28/prince-charles-extends-climate-doomsday-deadline/
Spreads are not his forte........Lay 33 years....Pro Tip.....easy money..
Show More
No doubt the same people who blame me and you for plastic, emissions, and lack of water, fooking ****s
I don't know why he's worrying. He'll be 105 by then and most probably dead for a decade.
Him and Attenborough make a right pair.
They must be two of biggest hypocrites in the country when you look at their carbon footprints.
Charlie on the radio telling everyone to eat his Mutton because he produces it on his farms.
Next off he's become a vegetarian telling everybody that eating meat is the biggest cause of global warming.
Then Attenborough who's clocked up more air miles than Jim Kirk making his tedious nature programmes.
They must be two of biggest hypocrites in the country when you look at their carbon footprints.
Charlie on the radio telling everyone to eat his Mutton because he produces it on his farms.
Next off he's become a vegetarian telling everybody that eating meat is the biggest cause of global warming.
Then Attenborough who's clocked up more air miles than Jim Kirk making his tedious nature programmes.
After all they swim in it every day ,but still don’t see ,£hit
The Royals love helecopter travel, usual excuse is 'security'
If we want less pollution of the planet we need less people on it. Have any of the virtue signallers mentioned this, or do they pretend we can increase populations for ever?
Fair point saddo, imo certain illnesses control,war controls,food, and water to ,...but that’s my opinion..
The Chinese had a rule about 2 children,which never happened (nothing against Chinese)..the thing is over population is now at a premium, somethings got to give .......and how?
Stop rewarding people with child benefits and tax credits for having more than two would be a start.
Really,....so your a better person?.what are you saying ..
It's pretty obvious I'm saying not rewarding people for having more than two children would lead to less children being born. Better person? Are you on drugs or something?
Smashed bud ,just like your head.see that bubble ?....bud
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539