Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
19 Mar 19
23:45
Joined:
Date Joined:
05 Apr 02
That was quick.
Betfair should open a book on who the grass is.
Betfair should open a book on who the grass is.
Show More
Yep that's it. I was waiting on a salt of the earth comment. Gone but not forgotten.
tbf anyone could have reported that, there was a few unhappy about it
:)charlie there is no point in reading words , if you don't understand words
Charlie,the guy who if you call him out just runs away and hides,what the point of him?
When someone posts a torrent of abuse like the one from Charlie levelled against my good self, it raises an interesting point.
Which is, how much confidence the abuser must feel that he will not be excluded from the forum following his outburst.
For who deliberately sticks their head on the chopping lock?
I've seen the same kind of confidence regarding abusive stuff from other posters, and one in particular who maintained a constant abusive onslaught over several days and again against my good self some time back, accusing me of posting obscene and racist comments on YouTube.
The intention was that I would return the abuse and of course be banned, while he was pretty sure he would not get any comebacks whatsoever for blatantly breaking the forum's terms and agreements.
Which proved to be the case.
I noticed another poster on Charlie's thread whose name I don't care to mention, making the same accusation that I'm someone who posts on YouTube.
It goes without saying that there are some very nasty and vindictive people posting on here, who regularly post stuff far worse than what the vast majority get banned for.
Which is, how much confidence the abuser must feel that he will not be excluded from the forum following his outburst.
For who deliberately sticks their head on the chopping lock?
I've seen the same kind of confidence regarding abusive stuff from other posters, and one in particular who maintained a constant abusive onslaught over several days and again against my good self some time back, accusing me of posting obscene and racist comments on YouTube.
The intention was that I would return the abuse and of course be banned, while he was pretty sure he would not get any comebacks whatsoever for blatantly breaking the forum's terms and agreements.
Which proved to be the case.
I noticed another poster on Charlie's thread whose name I don't care to mention, making the same accusation that I'm someone who posts on YouTube.
It goes without saying that there are some very nasty and vindictive people posting on here, who regularly post stuff far worse than what the vast majority get banned for.
The worst type is him above, he will call me this,that the other because want I say he don't like,so I say ok correct me whetre im wrong,over to you chaz and guess what? nothing,not a word,the bloke doesn't know if im right or wrong,but a clue and not the foggiest. I know other about womens cricket so I don't butt in where im not wanted
Mar 20, 2019 -- 12:14PM, terry mccann wrote:
The worst type is him above, he will call me this,that the other because want I say he don't like,so I say ok correct me whetre im wrong,over to you chaz and guess what? nothing,not a word,the bloke doesn't know if im right or wrong,but a clue and not the foggiest. I know other about womens cricket so I don't butt in where im not wanted
You know nothing about anything. Certainly not spelling, punctuation and grammar.
A lovely fellow but his opinion aint worth jack as he has proved time and time again
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539