Jan 5, 2019 -- 6:21PM, Just Checking wrote:
Yes because of course if a woman has a child the man has no responsbilities: emotionally, socially or financially for it.FFS .....
but the question wasn't about supporting a child, it was about aborting a foetus.... FFS!!!
Jan 7, 2019 -- 3:07AM, Culvin wrote:
In this day and age , abortions really should be in very few figures . How difficult is it for a fella to just put a bit of rubber on the end of it or a girl to take a tablet the next day .
Not difficult but we are talking about the stupid age here
My cousin didn't even know after Ejaculation it takes hours for the "left over" to be gone
He generally believes all he had to do was go for a p*** and he could go again 30 minutes later with no risk
Jan 7, 2019 -- 10:43AM, Just Checking wrote:
Oh and re the "man has no interest" assertion by the forums predictably feminist friendly leftie brigade. I'm sure many men would be fine with that IF the "we have no interest" signature meant there was never any future obligation. Is that the deal you are offering? Of COURSE you aren't. The femimist left would crucify you.You (despite the fact lefties live by the concept) can't have it both ways. You can't say "men have no say in the matter" and then the result of it the same equation is "men have an 18 year / life long HUGE obligation on the same matter".What I'm saying obviously makes sense. I'm sure it wouldn't go down well in SJW / virtue signalling circles though...I mean never mind the examples I've seen in MY small experience of women trying to entrap men through pregnancy, there have even been examples where women use used condoms to do it!!!
Women who do that are pretty classless
But men really should read the signals better, and a man should always buy his own condoms