according to Reuters," the so called Islamic State" claimed responsibility for the attack (Tehran), they also reportedly took responsibility for the violence in London, despite evidence emerging that the three suspects were long known to British security and Intelligence agencies and were SIMPLE ALLOWED TO PLOT AND CARRY OUT THEIR ATTACKS" now that's got to be rubbish surely
1) clueless muppet gets radicalised 2) fellow muslims tip off the police or MI5 3) MI5 discover the would-be terrorist is a clueless muppet so ignore him 4) clueless muppet kills a few people but more are saved because muppet is clueless 5) after a few hours, ISIL claims responsibility if no-one else does
Steps 3 and 5 are most relevant to OP.
ISIL is not made up of terrorist overlords masterminding attacks. It just claims them afterwards.
The usual sequence is this:1) clueless muppet gets radicalised2) fellow muslims tip off the police or MI53) MI5 discover the would-be terrorist is a clueless muppet so ignore him4) clueless muppet kills a few people but more are saved because muppet
so they could have stopped at anytime but the GOVERNMENT ie British security/Intelligence let it happen killing innocent people in London and Manchester too just to get what? its got to be crazy talk
so they could have stopped at anytime but the GOVERNMENT ie British security/Intelligence let it happen killing innocent people in London and Manchester too just to get what? its got to be crazy talk