Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Aunty Post
30 May 15 15:25
Joined:
Date Joined: 14 Nov 03
| Topic/replies: 12,444 | Blogger: Aunty Post's blog
Probably another stupid question by me, but what is the logic of reducing the capacity from 80,000 to 58,000?

Just seems like a negative and unnecessary spend!
Pause • Switch to Standard View The 2012 Olympic Stadium
Show More
Loading...
Report spellingandgrammarchecker • May 30, 2015 3:42 PM BST
So West Ham supporters can lie down when they get bored.
Report Burton-Brewers • May 30, 2015 4:05 PM BST
some will be lost to segregation but not 22,000. Are they building hospitality boxes?
Report Aunty Post • May 30, 2015 4:19 PM BST
Need to check it out, but I'm almost sure they were talking about reducing the height of the entire structure!
Report Aunty Post • May 30, 2015 4:37 PM BST
Chancellor George Osborne has agreed an extra £25 million injection, with a £20 million loan from the Mayor, bringing the total cost of adapting the venue after the Games to  £160 million — the vast majority from the public purse.

Fek me!!! Boris must be worth a few bob!
Report john92 • May 30, 2015 7:09 PM BST
Some of the stadium was always designed to be temporary.

West Ham will struggle to fill it as it is so leaving it at 80,000 was not an option. Olymoic Stadiums are always a waste of money one way or the other.
Report Poppydog. • May 30, 2015 7:41 PM BST
Roughly how many times has it been used since the closing ceremony?
Report john92 • May 30, 2015 9:36 PM BST
They had that anniversary games.....

I should have said that those stadiums are a waste if no long term plan - like Atlanta or Sydney. An 80,000 seat athletics stadium is a white elephant. No city should win a bid with a half billion quid stadium with no concrete long term plan.
Report Coachbuster • May 30, 2015 10:32 PM BST
Probably another stupid question by me
__________________________________

do you lie awake at night trying to think up questions ?
Report spellingandgrammarchecker • May 30, 2015 10:34 PM BST
No idea about AP, but I find it difficult to think up questions while I'm asleep.
Report lybertyne • May 31, 2015 10:26 AM BST
If West Ham had an 80,000 seater their home games would look half-empty.
Report JBNAY • May 31, 2015 10:41 AM BST
^^^ there would be more empty seats than bubbles! ^^^
Report MisterBadger • May 31, 2015 10:46 AM BST
Roughly how many times has it been used since the closing ceremony?

Not sure if it has been - they've been spending the last year and a half - or longer - doing the conversion, i.e. fitting retractable seating, new floodlights and putting a lid on to create a better/louder atmosphere. Final capacity will be 54k iirc.
Report Degs • May 31, 2015 11:09 AM BST
It'll be used for the World Athletic Championships in 2017, so that's another 8 days accounted for.
Report pumphol. • May 31, 2015 11:14 AM BST
JBNAY    31 May 15 10:41 
^^^ there would be more empty seats than bubbles! ^^^


You obviously have no idea about bubble machines do you Crazy
Report Aunty Post • May 31, 2015 11:22 AM BST
Some of the stadium was always designed to be temporary.


Yes John, I know that but it just seemed like a negative spend, that's all.

Unless they were going to be hit by a tax of a surfeit of seating, along the lines of the "Bedroom Tax"!
Report mafeking • May 31, 2015 8:50 PM BST
5 or 6 matches at the rugby world cup in september
Report Coachbuster • May 31, 2015 8:58 PM BST
Olly Muirs will have his picture taken there  in Nov

will be then known as the Olly M Pic stadium
Report spellingandgrammarchecker • June 1, 2015 12:42 PM BST
5/10
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539