Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
spellingandgrammarchecker
26 May 15 19:49
Joined:
Date Joined: 20 Dec 10
| Topic/replies: 6,293 | Blogger: spellingandgrammarchecker's blog
As the BBC news reports all seem to think that London stretches all over Surrey, Kent, Essex, Hertfordshire, Berkshire, and all points in between, put the whole lot under just one boundary, for just one seat in Parliament.

You still get a useless w*nker as an M.P. but you get rid of loads of pigs from the trough.

Look at the wages (plus expenses) that can be saved.
Pause • Switch to Standard View Political Boundary Changes - what...
Show More
Loading...
Report spellingandgrammarchecker • May 26, 2015 11:35 PM BST
This thread needs livening up a bit.

It was some considerable time ago I posted that I had heard news of a major boundary change going to happen in east London.

The idea was that Hackney north, Diane Abbot's seat, was going to be scrapped, as was Hackney South, and would become just one seat. 

I'd love to see her lose out to another Labour MP and get her fat nose out of the trough.
Report Muntz Street • May 27, 2015 12:08 AM BST
I support the idea in the opening post.

It would see the disappearance of 104 Tory MPs, 49 Labour, 4 Lib Dems, 1 UKIP, 1 Green and The Speaker.

One of the Tories would most likely be elected in the new giant seat.
Report spellingandgrammarchecker • May 27, 2015 12:35 AM BST
^^^^

150+ MPs bite the dust.

A saving of at least £10million, plus expenses. 

What's not to like?
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539