funny how the christian church are so openly opposed to same sex marriage whilst at the same time they turn a blind eye to their members who are busy sh4gging the choirboys
The DUP have been hijacked by dangerous bunch of christian fundamentalists who are still living in the dark ages
Hardly "christian" is it?
funny how the christian church are so openly opposed to same sex marriage whilst at the same time they turn a blind eye to their members who are busy sh4gging the choirboysThe DUP have been hijacked by dangerous bunch of christian fundamentalists who
So presumably now the bakers will be forced to make this cake.
Anyone care to guess how much care and attention will go into it......and how much chilli powder and cod liver oil?
The bakers want to keep it just this side of being reported to Food Standards but after that, it's down to them the level of service they are prepared / forced to give to a customer who is not there to secure a service but to score a petty, stupid, political point.
So presumably now the bakers will be forced to make this cake.Anyone care to guess how much care and attention will go into it......and how much chilli powder and cod liver oil?The bakers want to keep it just this side of being reported to Food Stand
These Barstards are ruining small little businesses , they need to be shown that people will stand up to them. We are having a Referendum allow Gay marraige in Ireland. Hopefully this shows people what this shower are really like.
These Barstards are ruining small little businesses , they need to be shown that people will stand up to them. We are having a Referendum allow Gay marraige in Ireland. Hopefully this shows people what this shower are really like.
Certainly legitimises a bunch of juvenile (non) jokes whilst ensuring real homophobic prejudice / violence - the kind that kills or leads to suicide - to go unaddressed.
Certainly legitimises a bunch of juvenile (non) jokes whilst ensuring real homophobic prejudice / violence - the kind that kills or leads to suicide - to go unaddressed.
"What we cannot have is a hierarchy of rights, and today there's a clear hierarchy being established that gay rights are more important than the rights of people to hold religious beliefs," Mr Givan added.
and Mr Givan is entirely correct. In a truly sensible society, there are the rights of the people according to the law of the society they live in and that is that.
There are no additional rights based on your choice of sky pixie.
"What we cannot have is a hierarchy of rights, and today there's a clear hierarchy being established that gay rights are more important than the rights of people to hold religious beliefs," Mr Givan added.and Mr Givan is entirely correct. In a truly
but laws are changed all the time, see Putins russia for anti gay laws. Putin could just as easily say there are the rights of the people according to the law of the society they live in and that is that.
First Amendment The First Amendment guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition. It forbids Congress from both promoting one religion over others and also restricting an individual’s religious practices. It guarantees freedom of expression by prohibiting Congress from restricting the press or the rights of individuals to speak freely. It also guarantees the right of citizens to assemble peaceably and to petition their government.
US seems to give rights to sky pixie followers
but laws are changed all the time, see Putins russia for anti gay laws. Putin could just as easily say there are the rights of the people according to the law of the society they live in and that is that. First AmendmentThe First Amendment guarantee
i think you're only looking at one side of the 1st amendment.
the first amendment works both ways, in so much that the state has no business in religion, and that religion has no business influencing the state. its origins are primarily about the need for a separation between church and state.
it couldn't be clearer in stating that whilst everyone has a freedom to practise whatever religion they choose, the state does not make laws based on religious practices.
i think you're only looking at one side of the 1st amendment. the first amendment works both ways, in so much that the state has no business in religion, and that religion has no business influencing the state. its origins are primarily about the nee