Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
03 Jan 15
23:30
Joined:
Date Joined:
10 Jul 02
Walk Right Now, for me
what a groove!
what a groove!
Show More
Five masterpieces to get you started:
1. I Want You Back
2. Got To Be There
3. Shake Your Body Down To The Ground
4. Wanna be Startin' Something
5. Earth Song
1. I Want You Back
2. Got To Be There
3. Shake Your Body Down To The Ground
4. Wanna be Startin' Something
5. Earth Song
I want you back.....the guy was a genius so young.
Billie Jean..... Kind of the ultimate pop song.
Smooth Criminal....cracking
I always think wacko deserved his place in the oantheon purely for his work in the Jackson 5. His first three solo albums were all great too. Whatever you may or may not think about him personally he was a musical genius.
Billie Jean..... Kind of the ultimate pop song.
Smooth Criminal....cracking
I always think wacko deserved his place in the oantheon purely for his work in the Jackson 5. His first three solo albums were all great too. Whatever you may or may not think about him personally he was a musical genius.
1 Ben
2 Say Say Say (with Macca)
3 Earth Song
4 Man In The Mirror
5 The Girl Is Mine (with Macca)
for me
2 Say Say Say (with Macca)
3 Earth Song
4 Man In The Mirror
5 The Girl Is Mine (with Macca)
for me
[Sorry kenny - and I don't want to fall out with you (again!) - but some of your musical choices in songs are so cr@p 'good grief' has to be uttered at times!]
Lol Tommy.
The Girl is Mine is cringeworthy. How could two such talented people make such dross. Blame it on the eighties.
The Girl is Mine is cringeworthy. How could two such talented people make such dross. Blame it on the eighties.
Jan 3, 2015 -- 11:57PM, Tommy Toes wrote:
Good grief.
Kenny. It looks like tommy don't agree but let me tell you:
Ken(ny) the two of us need look no more
We both found what we were looking for
With a friend to call my own
I'll never be alone
And you my friend will see
You've got a friend in me
hahahahaha!!
Did kenny think Ben was about a cat and not a rat, perhaps?!
Did kenny think Ben was about a cat and not a rat, perhaps?!
ha ha Tommy, I know it was about his pet rat that his father killed in a trap and he was devastated. A brilliant song. He was a musical genius.
Love Is The (Prescription) Drug . (Conrad Murray Mix)
I heard that michael Jackson didn't like any of the jacksons songs compared to more recent songs by black boy bands. In fact it was common knowledge he preferred boys 2 men.
trivia about 'earth song' which will be of no interest to anyone except me
The drummer on that track is steve ferrone, ex awb and for the past 20 years drummer with tom petty & the heartbreakers
The drummer on that track is steve ferrone, ex awb and for the past 20 years drummer with tom petty & the heartbreakers
i can find a link to tom in just about anything tommy 
Thanks Crisp, Tommy's musical views can be discounted. He thinks all 70s music is crap apart from the odd ones he keeps coming up with from this decade.
Ebony and Ivory was Macca and Stevie Wonder as you well know. A brilliant song.
I know you can, Nilsson!
And it bloody well was, kenny!
Anyone who thinks the 70s was a great decade for music must be round the bend!
And it bloody well was, kenny!
Anyone who thinks the 70s was a great decade for music must be round the bend!
Didn't say it was great but a lot of very good songs as well as the dross.
It was absolute muck for almost a whole ten years, with a few exceptions that in that 'only on the BBC era' were rarely heard.
You had to scour Radio Luxembourg and Tune in to TOGWT to even find anything purporting to music.
You had to scour Radio Luxembourg and Tune in to TOGWT to even find anything purporting to music.
The thing which you have to remember Rob is; if you were a kid in the 70s, poor, with only a cr@ppy old radio and the tv to hear any music on (because you certainly didn't have the means to buy a good radio and records) - you were almost totally at the behest of BBC in what you could listen to - which was their designated cr@p playlist on their radio stations and TOTP.
There was only Radio Luxembourg where you had any chance of hearing anything different than The Osmonds, The Bay City Rollers, The Rubettes etc etc etc of ultimate ear-curdling cr@p.
There was only Radio Luxembourg where you had any chance of hearing anything different than The Osmonds, The Bay City Rollers, The Rubettes etc etc etc of ultimate ear-curdling cr@p.
I quite liked The Osmonds and The Rubettes came out with 2 brilliant singles.
Jan 3, 2015 -- 11:56PM, kenny mann wrote:
1 Ben2 Say Say Say (with Macca)3 Earth Song4 Man In The Mirror5 The Girl Is Mine (with Macca)for me
BEN, ffs, you must as be as soft as shyte
why is there a thread on this fella? he was a weirdo who invited children to stay in his house! and paid off another kids family after the paedo allegations ffs, he deserves no air time
Couldn't give a fk about his private life, he was a brilliant musician. Not soft, ex pro boxer.
I was told he used to smear soft cheese triangles on his genitalia.
Jackson should be treated like Gary Glitter.....paedophile abuser....he just had more money to cover it up.
I loved the guy's music but no way would I let him baby sit my kids.
FFS wesdaq obviously he f ucking wasn't because he paid them off, if he was INNOCENT hw would have fought to clear his name, I would hazard a guess Jimmy Saville was a poor man's Jackson, plenty more s hit to hit the fan, only been 5 years since death
You lot are as bad as the bbc ....apologists for the King of the Paedophiles.
He was taken to court by the Jordie Chandler and they paid him off near $20m ....not the actions of someone who is innocent .
...and there were many others.
...and there were many others.
Choice was stay and fight a court case rather than go on tour and lose say $200m.
Or pay $20m.
That was the choice roughly.
Or pay $20m.
That was the choice roughly.
.
http://radaronline.com/exclusives/2014/05/michael-jackson-accused-pedophile-pepsi-james-safechuck/
http://radaronline.com/exclusives/2014/05/michael-jackson-accused-pedophile-pepsi-james-safechuck/
Many allegations were put forward in the court case of 2005 and what was the result?
Under proper scrutiny they fell apart.
Whatever you may think of any individual, until they are able to defend themselves fully, in court, you have to give them the benefit of the doubt.
Under proper scrutiny they fell apart.
Whatever you may think of any individual, until they are able to defend themselves fully, in court, you have to give them the benefit of the doubt.
You have got to be joking....too many allegations against him.....guilty !
Has MJ's cover version of Billy J Kramer's 1964 No 1 hit "Little Children" finally been given a posthumous release?
Hmm.
So at what point does one become guilty?
After 1 allegation? Or maybe 2? How about 5?
However, thankfully, we do not have a system of law which is based on guilt by allegation or accusation.
That's why we have courts to test the voracity of any such allegation/accusation.
So at what point does one become guilty?
After 1 allegation? Or maybe 2? How about 5?
However, thankfully, we do not have a system of law which is based on guilt by allegation or accusation.
That's why we have courts to test the voracity of any such allegation/accusation.
He is obviously your idol....it's colouring your view of the monster.
It scares me that some of the people on this forum could find their way onto a Jury 
.
.
I admit, I admire MJ's music but I certainly did not worship him!
Simply, I just happen to be old-fashioned in that I do not believe in guilt by accusation.
Simply, I just happen to be old-fashioned in that I do not believe in guilt by accusation.
MJ was an exteremly rich extremely famous celeb who was also pretty damned wierd.
He's going to attract rumours like flies to sh*t, regardless.
No smoke without fire, sorry, I hate that expression :(
He's going to attract rumours like flies to sh*t, regardless.
No smoke without fire, sorry, I hate that expression :(
Wesdag
Whatever you may think of any individual, until they are able to defend themselves fully, in court, you have to give them the benefit of the doubt.
Like Prince Andrew for instance?
Whatever you may think of any individual, until they are able to defend themselves fully, in court, you have to give them the benefit of the doubt.
Like Prince Andrew for instance?
How could you trust Jacko to tell the whole truth about what they got up to with young boys staying in his bedroom when he denies he has had any plastic surgery!
'Tis somewhat pleasing and flattering to see akabula and his alter ego cmat following my every post. 
I'm glad that you can see the parallel.
Everyone should be given the benefit of the doubt regardless of race or class.
I have been amused by the rush of people, who are usually not so fair-minded, to plead in Andrew's defence because he happens to be the old dear's son.
I'm glad that you can see the parallel.
Everyone should be given the benefit of the doubt regardless of race or class.
I have been amused by the rush of people, who are usually not so fair-minded, to plead in Andrew's defence because he happens to be the old dear's son.
Jackson had maybe 30 complaints against him....he wore out his benefit of doubt long ago.
i've honestly never seen someone so far up someone else's backside than I have with akabula and cmat, cringworthy stuff
From a forum :
We all know Harry's alleged to be the progeny of a certain Major Hewitt, but were we also aware of the much older rumours of the Queen's dalliances of the extra-marital variety that resulted in Princes Andrew and Edward?
The story begins way back when in ye olde times (the 1950s) when the Queen discovered her husband's affair with her cousin Princess Alexandra. Accoring to the story, the Queen was extremely upset by his philandering but of course divorce was out of the question. The love, however, was gone, and the marriage fell into the usual royal convenience arrangement with Phillip continuing his adulterous liasons while Lizzie sought psychiatric treatment for depression and banned him from the royal bedchamber.
Lord Mountbatten intervened at this point, ordering the **** to stop the affair and being promptly told to fark orf. By 1956, the couple were living separate lives, with Phillip's affairs numerous and Liz to all intents and purposes a free agent.
Lord Porchester
WIth the death of her marriage, it seems Lizzie is alleged to have sought comfort in ther arms of royal stablemaster Lord Porchester. References to the exact start date of the affair are scarce, but it is thought to have begun in the late 1950s. Allegedly, the two would spend hours talking about horses and go for romantic walks in the grounds of the Queen's various palaces.
Naturally, this didn't last long before royal busybody Lord Mountbatten stuck his oar in. He's alleged to have written a letter to the Queen giving her a good ticking off and urging her to be more discreet in the relationship. And then Prince Andrew appeared, looking strangely like Porchester and unlike Phillip.
Cabinet papers of the 1959 government were released in 1990, and the royal family figured in three discussions. However, the exact references were blanked out for reasons of national security; one of them being held under a 50 year rule and the other two held under 100 years - the earliest date the public will learn of these discussions and their content is 2059.
When Andrew was born, it was rumoured amongst those in the know that Phillip had not been around in the period when the baby had been conceived. Coupled with a lack of public exposure of the newborn, which included a suspicious lack of photographs, and the rumour was entrenched.
Nigel Dempster referred to the rumour in an early 1990s issue of the New York Times, leading journalist Fiammenta Rocco to ask Prince Phillip if it was true during an interview in 1993. He did not answer the question, and Dempster's article was not challenged by the royals.
We all know Harry's alleged to be the progeny of a certain Major Hewitt, but were we also aware of the much older rumours of the Queen's dalliances of the extra-marital variety that resulted in Princes Andrew and Edward?
The story begins way back when in ye olde times (the 1950s) when the Queen discovered her husband's affair with her cousin Princess Alexandra. Accoring to the story, the Queen was extremely upset by his philandering but of course divorce was out of the question. The love, however, was gone, and the marriage fell into the usual royal convenience arrangement with Phillip continuing his adulterous liasons while Lizzie sought psychiatric treatment for depression and banned him from the royal bedchamber.
Lord Mountbatten intervened at this point, ordering the **** to stop the affair and being promptly told to fark orf. By 1956, the couple were living separate lives, with Phillip's affairs numerous and Liz to all intents and purposes a free agent.
Lord Porchester
WIth the death of her marriage, it seems Lizzie is alleged to have sought comfort in ther arms of royal stablemaster Lord Porchester. References to the exact start date of the affair are scarce, but it is thought to have begun in the late 1950s. Allegedly, the two would spend hours talking about horses and go for romantic walks in the grounds of the Queen's various palaces.
Naturally, this didn't last long before royal busybody Lord Mountbatten stuck his oar in. He's alleged to have written a letter to the Queen giving her a good ticking off and urging her to be more discreet in the relationship. And then Prince Andrew appeared, looking strangely like Porchester and unlike Phillip.
Cabinet papers of the 1959 government were released in 1990, and the royal family figured in three discussions. However, the exact references were blanked out for reasons of national security; one of them being held under a 50 year rule and the other two held under 100 years - the earliest date the public will learn of these discussions and their content is 2059.
When Andrew was born, it was rumoured amongst those in the know that Phillip had not been around in the period when the baby had been conceived. Coupled with a lack of public exposure of the newborn, which included a suspicious lack of photographs, and the rumour was entrenched.
Nigel Dempster referred to the rumour in an early 1990s issue of the New York Times, leading journalist Fiammenta Rocco to ask Prince Phillip if it was true during an interview in 1993. He did not answer the question, and Dempster's article was not challenged by the royals.
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539