. http://www.cnbc.com/id/101884104#. . U.S. forces conducted airstrikes in northern Iraq on Thursday against militants who had trapped religious minorities in Kurdish areas, the New York Times reported, citing Kurdish sources.
McClatchy also reported jet aircraft attacking Islamic militant positions in the Kurdish region, citing a local source, though the report said it was not clear who was conducting the strike.
But the Pentagon's press secretary, via his verified Twitter account, denied any such action had taken place.
.http://www.cnbc.com/id/101884104#..U.S. forces conducted airstrikes in northern Iraq on Thursday against militants who had trapped religious minorities in Kurdish areas, the New York Times reported, citing Kurdish sources.McClatchy also reported jet
WASHINGTON — Airstrikes on towns in northern Iraq seized by Islamist militants began late Thursday in what Kurdish and Iraqi officials called the first stage of an American-led intervention to blunt the militants’ advance and provide emergency aid to tens of thousands of refugees.
The Pentagon firmly denied that American forces had begun a bombing campaign. But Pentagon officials said it was possible that allies of the United States, either the Iraqi or Turkish militaries, had conducted the bombing.
Kurdish and Iraqi officials attributed the bombing campaign to American forces. An announcement on Kurdish television of what was described as an American intervention prompted street celebrations and horn-honking by residents of towns under seige by the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria.
Kurdish officials said the bombings initially had targeted ISIS fighters who had seized two towns, Gwer and Mahmour. A top Iraqi official in Baghdad close to Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki of Iraq said that the Americans had consulted with the Iraqi government Thursday night about starting the campaign, the government had agreed and the bombing began.
NY Times :WASHINGTON — Airstrikes on towns in northern Iraq seized by Islamist militants began late Thursday in what Kurdish and Iraqi officials called the first stage of an American-led intervention to blunt the militants’ advance and provide em
Have to say, this is one military operation I totally support. These people are animals who do nothing but terrorise, extort and decapitate people who dare to defy them, all in the supposed name of Islam. I wager that 98% of the worlds muslims feel the same way about this lot as the rest of us do. There are no words for their inhumanity and depravity. I hope the yanks destroy every single one of the subhuman fckers.
Have to say, this is one military operation I totally support. These people are animals who do nothing but terrorise, extort and decapitate people who dare to defy them, all in the supposed name of Islam. I wager that 98% of the worlds muslims feel t
so the US are going to bomb them in Iraq whilst at the same time supporting them and supplying them with weapons in syria where they are fighting the assad government forces you really could not make it up as they say
so the US are going to bomb them in Iraq whilst at the same time supporting them and supplying them with weapons in syria where they are fighting the assad government forces you really could not make it up as they say
Even stranger that Uk and US were on their way to bomb Assad until their people said no.
Would have given ISIS a walkover and probably tens of thousands slaughtered by now.
Even stranger that Uk and US were on their way to bomb Assad until their people said no.Would have given ISIS a walkover and probably tens of thousands slaughtered by now.
thats a good point. of course this is a result of the US and NATO wrecking countries like libya.iraq and syria and not giving a flying fek what follows on afterwards
thats a good point.of course this is a result of the US and NATO wrecking countries like libya.iraq and syria and not giving a flying fek what follows on afterwards
Hamsterdam Hamsterdam 08 Aug 14 00:53 Joined: 03 Nov 11 | Topic/replies: 7,707 | Blogger: Hamsterdam's blog Good on the yanks I say.
Phuck me. If they hadn't invaded Iraq in the first place, this wouldn't be happening now.
HamsterdamHamsterdam 08 Aug 14 00:53 Joined: 03 Nov 11 | Topic/replies: 7,707 | Blogger: Hamsterdam's blogGood on the yanks I say.Phuck me. If they hadn't invaded Iraq in the first place, this wouldn't be happening now.
We have a right to intervene on humanitarian grounds, but that is all, indeed we should and if we had stuck to that and only that, a good many people dead now would be alive
We should have done this with Saddam, protect the Kurds, not overthrow him!
There is no point in trying to interfere between Shias and Sunnis, as only they can work that one out
We stick to humanitarian intervention only, ie stop genocide
We have a right to intervene on humanitarian grounds, but that is all, indeed we shouldand if we had stuck to that and only that, a good many people dead now would be aliveWe should have done this with Saddam, protect the Kurds, not overthrow him!The
I would still say the Iraqis were better off under Saddam than Isis surely? So what point was there in taking him down
If we really cared about the Kurds why did we just not intervene and say to Saddam "hands off - no genocide here" but we did not did we???
I do want to see intervention here, protect those Kurds, protect those Christians. That would be a good thing for a change
I would still say the Iraqis were better off under Saddam than Isis surely?So what point was there in taking him downIf we really cared about the Kurds why did we just not intervene and say to Saddam "hands off - no genocide here"but we did not did w