We are honouring the soldiers who died fighting for their country out of a sense of duty.
We are NOT honouring our politicians who started these wars.
yes cdogWe are honouring the soldiers who died fighting for their countryout of a sense of duty.We are NOT honouring our politicians who started these wars.
We should honour the women who supported them, as well.
Because technology has moved on ie. bombing Nowadays women and children also have to make the ultimate sacrifice from WWII on.
We should honour the women who supported them, as well.Because technology has moved on ie. bombingNowadays women and children also have to make the ultimate sacrificefrom WWII on.
Luckily, everyone who fought in WW1 has died, so we can honour them with a cheap photo-op for politicians rather than sticking another tenner in their weekly pensions. And judging by the row over which party leader wrote what on their wreaths, we can't even get that right.
Luckily, everyone who fought in WW1 has died, so we can honour them with a cheap photo-op for politicians rather than sticking another tenner in their weekly pensions. And judging by the row over which party leader wrote what on their wreaths, we can
I think that one of the things that has to happen for humanity to not be doomed is to realise that there isn't that much difference between some 18-year-old Englishman cowering in terror in a trench and some 18-year-old German cowering in terror in a trench. I have always considered WW1 to have been a colossal, tragic waste of human life on both sides.
I think that one of the things that has to happen for humanity to not be doomed is to realise that there isn't that much difference between some 18-year-old Englishman cowering in terror in a trench and some 18-year-old German cowering in terror in a