why do people who contribute nothing (tax) to society get given a better quality of life in free housing and handouts than those who go out to work their guts out for minumum wage but are working nonetheless.
well he should pay more hes super rich when theres no need for him to be, hes stealing money off the lower paid u mention, and anyway the tax isnt really deducted as such from HIS wages, he gets paid for doing bugger all as it is
well he should pay more hes super rich when theres no need for him to be, hes stealing money off the lower paid u mention, and anyway the tax isnt really deducted as such from HIS wages, he gets paid for doing bugger all as it is
check the royal register. i think you'll find he does more than you do.
His highness has over 300 engagements a year.
Prince Charles has over 400 engagements.
check the royal register. i think you'll find he does more than you do.His highness has over 300 engagements a year.Prince Charles has over 400 engagements.
rustyboy 07 Jan 21:56 why do people who contribute nothing (tax) to society get given a better quality of life in free housing and handouts than those who go out to work their guts out for minumum wage but are working nonetheless
Where do you get your information?
Life on benefits is mostly fecking dreadful, and the quality of it is pox.
So the answer to your question is THEY DON'T
rustyboy 07 Jan 21:56 why do people who contribute nothing (tax) to society get given a better quality of life in free housing and handouts than those who go out to work their guts out for minumum wage but are working nonetheless Where do you get yo
Come to think of it - This (lower classes) is the attitude adopted by 2 types. 1. The upper middle class, and people bred into money, who run everything and are happy to send masses of the population out as cannon fodder. 2. Unthinking Tories.
Come to think of it - This (lower classes) is the attitude adopted by 2 types.1. The upper middle class, and people bred into money, who run everything and are happy to send masses of the population out as cannon fodder.2. Unthinking Tories.
I Believe Marie Antoinette had the right attitude towards them and indeed their dietary needs. (she didn't actually say that but still this is chit let's not let the truth get i the way)
On a more serious note though anyone who tihnks the underclasses don't cause a hell of a lot of the nation's ill's must be either blind or deaf or both.(cue bleeding hearts to mention bankers/financial crisis)
They contribute so very little to the society they live in and all that giving them a ridiculous amount of benefit has done is bred a type of "never have worked never will work chav class"
It's nothing new though let's not kid ourselves that the country hasn't always been blighted by this filth,it's just they don't doff their caps when we pass them in the street anymore.
I Believe Marie Antoinette had the right attitude towards them and indeed their dietary needs.(she didn't actually say that but still this is chit let's not let the truth get i the way)On a more serious note though anyone who tihnks the underclasses
check the royal register. i think you'll find he does more than you do.
His highness has over 300 engagements a year.
Prince Charles has over 400 engagements.
ROFL.......they do 7 in a day!! 4 ribbon cutings, 1 lunch and 2 'have you come far', job done, 3 months work
rustyboy 07 Jan 22:26 check the royal register. i think you'll find he does more than you do.His highness has over 300 engagements a year.Prince Charles has over 400 engagements. ROFL.......they do 7 in a day!! 4 ribbon cutings, 1 lunch and 2 'ha
I have studied the evidence presented, weighed up the arguements, compared the pros and cons and in my opinion.....the answer is.............zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Prima Donna 07 Jan 23:25 No it is not ,but let me tell you I could buy you many times over you disgrace.
Hmm..now that's poor form.I served under some horrible toffs but was never spoke to like that PD
That's the talk to take matters elsewhere
Prima Donna 07 Jan 23:25 No it is not ,but let me tell you I could buy you many times over you disgrace.Hmm..now that's poor form.I served under some horrible toffs but was never spoke to like that PDThat's the talk to take matters elsewhere
Bon viv,Im glad that you "served under horrible toffs"you see we know how to keep people like you in your place,as my Father said to me once,"WE are all equal in life its just that some of us are more equal than others"so next time I pass you in the street,remember to doff your cap to me.
Bon viv,Im glad that you "served under horrible toffs"you see we know how to keep people like you in your place,as my Father said to me once,"WE are all equal in life its just that some of us are more equal than others"so next time I pass you in the
Some hideous generalisations in this thread IMO. It's good to be aspirational, but the snobbery of some of you towards the poor is ridiculous and unfounded. Thatcher's vision of the aspirational society merely degenerated into a situation where you can denigrate somebody for having less money than you.
Some hideous generalisations in this thread IMO. It's good to be aspirational, but the snobbery of some of you towards the poor is ridiculous and unfounded. Thatcher's vision of the aspirational society merely degenerated into a situation where you c
Fair play if you do "work your guts out" . There are many, however, who get paid ridiculous amounts of money for sinecures. The fact that they do little or nothing to earn their over-inflated salaries, is conveniently forgotten when they complain about the amount they "pay" in Tax.
Fair play if you do "work your guts out" . There are many, however, who get paid ridiculous amounts of money for sinecures. The fact that they do little or nothing to earn their over-inflated salaries, is conveniently forgotten when they complain a