Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
johnn
06 Jan 10 11:11
Joined:
Date Joined: 14 Oct 02
| Topic/replies: 5,311 | Blogger: johnn's blog
!
Pause • Switch to Standard View haven't had a no.2 this decade
Show More
Loading...
Report Java • January 6, 2010 11:11 AM GMT
I've had just over 20 :)
Report Java • January 6, 2010 11:12 AM GMT
Seriously dude you better take some laxative? Or eat more?
Report Lies, DamnLies, and Statistics • January 6, 2010 11:12 AM GMT
considering this decade is more than 9 years old, i'd be slightly concerned...
Report johnn • January 6, 2010 11:13 AM GMT
Got the flu :-(
Report Bamboo • January 6, 2010 11:20 AM GMT
I hope you don`t get a fissure when you go
Report STUDYFORM • January 6, 2010 11:21 AM GMT
Lies, damn lies and statistics.
Living up to your name :)
Report V4 Vendetta • January 6, 2010 11:23 AM GMT
Just checking, you consider the decade to be 2000-2009 rather than 2001-2010?
Report V4 Vendetta • January 6, 2010 11:24 AM GMT
Oops, elvis dead spot by me there. Read the thread first...
Report bigH • January 6, 2010 11:27 AM GMT
I was in hospital recently and didn't have one for 11 days
Report STUDYFORM • January 6, 2010 11:30 AM GMT
out of interest. There was NO year zero. This is where the confusion lies imo.
A decade can be say, 1965 - 1974, if we want it to be, but if we bear in mind there was no year zero, then the "1st decade" had just 9 years. I would consider that 1960 was in the 60's, and 2010 is in the tens (or 201's as I like to call them).

Good luck with the constipation.
Report Sneaky Pete • January 6, 2010 11:34 AM GMT
http://tvshack.net/tv/South_Park/season_11/episode_9/a:298821/
Report fkqmz • January 6, 2010 11:34 AM GMT
who cares

please no one care

although technically true, feeling the need to point this out is absolutely tragic and COMPLETELY POINTLESS!!!!!!!!
Report Java • January 6, 2010 11:36 AM GMT
"out of interest. There was NO year zero. This is where the confusion lies imo"

Is this true? I'd have thought the first year would be like the start of a cricket over:

0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6

One over complete

Or am I wrong?
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539