Radio Times gives Pirates of the Caribbean just a 2 star rating.

thats all my AAAARGHS

Keir-iminal.

Shiver me timbers

Wonder what their reviewers gave it when it first came out.

Sure a lot of money changes hands to the people who review these things in the first place.

saw the secoond one in the cinema and didnt bother with the 3rd ....garbage movies

watch bridge on the river kwai 5 star rating

kak I.M.O

Ripping yarns. 5 stars

Absolute gash and totally over-acted tripe imo. Depp got more recognition for this sh1te than many of his other roles, madness.

tbf a 2 star rating was overly genourous imo.

who watched the great escape yesterday, premier league stuff

pirates struuggling at foot of conference by conparison

This was the only film I have ever fallen a sleep at the cinema while watching. so instead of a 2 I give it a ZZZ

A complete nonsense of a film, I would give it 0.1 stars and that´s only because I like Keira Knightley but then middle aged gamblers are probably not the target audience it has to be said.

2 stars generous IMO, too may movies made now purely to get a theme park and rollercoaseter up and running.

film stars have to eat .......... or take the white powder ............ costs money dontchaknow !

Its not suppose to be a documentary
Its carry on pirating!!!!!!!!!!!


:)

Awful film.

You lot are the types who would agree with the Radio Times giving 'TheTexas Chainsaw Massacre' 5 stars.

You probably think absolute guff like 'The Maltese Falcon' is great. You make me want to vomit.

knightley is a kak actress.

I walked out of the cinema 1/2 way through. 2 stars too many imo.

It is a bit hard to follow.

Not much sailing is their.

So they are now showing the earlier one ?

Pilates of the Caribbean would have been better

i saw bits of the first film, knightly looks good in that and healthy

but I think these days she has lost weight since that film and now looks skinny and gaunt?

I hate the radio times,why anyone wastes their money on such **e is beyond me

not with tvguide

i liked the first 2.

its sh it dont bother

In fact, I would say they are some of the best films ever made. Good cast, great effects.

Wur's got it right. You lot probably watch some subtitled Polish carp and think it's art.

clearly it is rubbish and Wur is fishing

the first one had a story & effects,I liked it a lot.

The 2nd one was a follow up with effects. The 3rd was absolute garbage.

:|

Very enjoyable romp this IMO, some imaginative ideas with the action scenes, and they clearly enjoyed making it. Not a classic, but great fun!

did you watch the first or the 2nd won sparky ?

Maybe they frown upon video piracy.

The second one's on now, I saw the third over Xmas, but found it a bit hard to follow what with my dad talking over it.

seen one , seen them all imo

Don't want to be seen to encourage Somalians.

2-10 is about right.

Gave up watching it after 20 mins

I should point out that this is a resurrected thread because Pirates 2 was on last night. It gets 3 stars in RT. Thee BBC seem to be showing the trilogy in reverse. Pirates 3 was the one I originally posted about over Xmas.