<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: MPs have JUST approved the Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) (Amendment)</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31652003/mps-have-just-approved-the-health-protection-coronavirus-restrictions-england-amendment</link><description>Big changes.Lets hope this puts a stop to the protests from all sides.</description><item><title>I think you just did</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31652003/mps-have-just-approved-the-health-protection-coronavirus-restrictions-england-amendment?post_id=559459015#559459015</link><description>I think you just did</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 06:56:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I give up is it not about time you start bringing up Dominic Cummings again?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31652003/mps-have-just-approved-the-health-protection-coronavirus-restrictions-england-amendment?post_id=559458991#559458991</link><description>I give up is it not about time you start bringing up Dominic Cummings again?</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 06:50:42 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Had you constructed a story based on the act instead of a spuriousstory you might have a point, but you didn't you have a spurious story. The wording of the act agrees with me, not you. I have put the clause on the thread.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31652003/mps-have-just-approved-the-health-protection-coronavirus-restrictions-england-amendment?post_id=559458973#559458973</link><description>Had you constructed a story based on the act instead of a spuriousstory you might have a point, but you didn't you have a spurious story. The wording of the act agrees with me, not you. I have put the clause on the thread.</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 06:45:44 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Maybe you can explain why my legal defence would fail, when you seem to alsoargue I don't even need that legal defence? Are you thick? I've clearly explained that to you. A clearly contrived defence of I have a contract to be here would not be consid</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31652003/mps-have-just-approved-the-health-protection-coronavirus-restrictions-england-amendment?post_id=559458961#559458961</link><description>Maybe you can explain why my legal defence would fail, when you seem to alsoargue I don't even need that legal defence? Are you thick? I've clearly explained that to you. A clearly contrived defence of I have a contract to be here would not be consid</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 06:41:45 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>It's not spurious to compare the legal concept of reasonable excuse across different acts prior to this legislation when a person doesn't understand what the new act means. The law relative to other acts with reasonable excuse defences will be very r</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31652003/mps-have-just-approved-the-health-protection-coronavirus-restrictions-england-amendment?post_id=559458947#559458947</link><description>It's not spurious to compare the legal concept of reasonable excuse across different acts prior to this legislation when a person doesn't understand what the new act means. The law relative to other acts with reasonable excuse defences will be very r</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 06:38:46 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Maybe you can explain why my legal defence would fail, when you seem to alsoargue I don't even need that legal defence?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31652003/mps-have-just-approved-the-health-protection-coronavirus-restrictions-england-amendment?post_id=559458925#559458925</link><description>Maybe you can explain why my legal defence would fail, when you seem to alsoargue I don't even need that legal defence?</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 06:34:01 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>You explaining the concept of reasonable excuse is fine... But not same as the spurious argument you introduced so you could claim equivalenceYou didn't guote the clause in the law you were using, My daft excuse still exists in law, your spurious sto</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31652003/mps-have-just-approved-the-health-protection-coronavirus-restrictions-england-amendment?post_id=559458915#559458915</link><description>You explaining the concept of reasonable excuse is fine... But not same as the spurious argument you introduced so you could claim equivalenceYou didn't guote the clause in the law you were using, My daft excuse still exists in law, your spurious sto</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 06:31:05 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I explained the legal concept of reasonable excuse that is in this act and in many acts before including the legislation involving knives. On realising how stupid your point was that a clearly contrived defence of contracting people to protest would</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31652003/mps-have-just-approved-the-health-protection-coronavirus-restrictions-england-amendment?post_id=559458873#559458873</link><description>I explained the legal concept of reasonable excuse that is in this act and in many acts before including the legislation involving knives. On realising how stupid your point was that a clearly contrived defence of contracting people to protest would</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 06:23:29 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The exemption I highlighted is in the relevant actYou fabricated a spurious story so you could dismiss that spurious story then attempt to claim  equivalence my pointRather than attempt to debate the actual point I made.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31652003/mps-have-just-approved-the-health-protection-coronavirus-restrictions-england-amendment?post_id=559458845#559458845</link><description>The exemption I highlighted is in the relevant actYou fabricated a spurious story so you could dismiss that spurious story then attempt to claim  equivalence my pointRather than attempt to debate the actual point I made.</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 06:17:40 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>And I pointed out the difference....</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31652003/mps-have-just-approved-the-health-protection-coronavirus-restrictions-england-amendment?post_id=559458825#559458825</link><description>And I pointed out the difference....</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 06:13:30 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
