New Posts For Thread: Jack Dorsey & Twitterhttps://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31648965/jack-dorsey-twitterWhole platform should be shut down imhoPicking a choosing what he and they agree as the "Truth"Any platform allowing anonymous terrorists to organise and encourage violence and destruction should be shut down.Its also a dehumanising platform that encit's stupid if any mainstream organisation is punished for anything a contributor has said that was beyond their control unless pre-recorded, so I don't agree with that anyway. Does not matter how much you punished offenders there one born every secohttps://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31648965/jack-dorsey-twitter?post_id=559393005#559393005it's stupid if any mainstream organisation is punished for anything a contributor has said that was beyond their control unless pre-recorded, so I don't agree with that anyway. Does not matter how much you punished offenders there one born every secoTue, 02 Jun 2020 17:43:05 -0500No, I'm saying that articles and posts on twitter and facebook should be regulated in exactly the same way as articles and posts on mailonline, theguardian or bbc.co.uk. They all have to take responsibility for what's posted on their sites. Twitter ahttps://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31648965/jack-dorsey-twitter?post_id=559392959#559392959No, I'm saying that articles and posts on twitter and facebook should be regulated in exactly the same way as articles and posts on mailonline, theguardian or bbc.co.uk. They all have to take responsibility for what's posted on their sites. Twitter aTue, 02 Jun 2020 17:29:56 -0500again, you are comparing new media with old media by saying social media should be treated the same as tv/radio/newspapers, it's all well and good saying they are responsible for their content but tv/radio/newspapers do not have billions of words ofhttps://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31648965/jack-dorsey-twitter?post_id=559392899#559392899again, you are comparing new media with old media by saying social media should be treated the same as tv/radio/newspapers, it's all well and good saying they are responsible for their content but tv/radio/newspapers do not have billions of words ofTue, 02 Jun 2020 17:14:39 -0500I've provided a perfectly reasonable solution. They are licensed in this country the same way every other media company is. They are responsible for their content, just as every other media company is. And if that content is deemed illegal, libelloushttps://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31648965/jack-dorsey-twitter?post_id=559392727#559392727I've provided a perfectly reasonable solution. They are licensed in this country the same way every other media company is. They are responsible for their content, just as every other media company is. And if that content is deemed illegal, libellousTue, 02 Jun 2020 16:32:06 -0500By the wayCan we have more regulation on old media creating clickbait Headline titles to draw people in and subsequently wasting their time, they also generate income per click and should not be allowed to trick people, making money under false pretehttps://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31648965/jack-dorsey-twitter?post_id=559392699#559392699By the wayCan we have more regulation on old media creating clickbait Headline titles to draw people in and subsequently wasting their time, they also generate income per click and should not be allowed to trick people, making money under false preteTue, 02 Jun 2020 16:24:03 -0500but you're not providing a solution only a wish along with they have money so they can find a way answer, we have the richest countries and economies in the world who can't find cancer cures or SARS vaccines 17 years later and by God they have pouredhttps://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31648965/jack-dorsey-twitter?post_id=559392681#559392681but you're not providing a solution only a wish along with they have money so they can find a way answer, we have the richest countries and economies in the world who can't find cancer cures or SARS vaccines 17 years later and by God they have pouredTue, 02 Jun 2020 16:16:08 -0500If somebody does something illegal online eg libel, incitement, etc, then its a matter for the police. No need for the platform provider to get involved other than hand over details on request.If somebody is doing something legal online that annoys shttps://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31648965/jack-dorsey-twitter?post_id=559392679#559392679If somebody does something illegal online eg libel, incitement, etc, then its a matter for the police. No need for the platform provider to get involved other than hand over details on request.If somebody is doing something legal online that annoys sTue, 02 Jun 2020 16:15:49 -0500It is absolutely the opposite of ludicrous. They have the cleverest of people plucked from around the world earning absolute fortunes to develop algorithms and programmes that will earn them money. You think it's beyond their ability to create the sahttps://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31648965/jack-dorsey-twitter?post_id=559392665#559392665It is absolutely the opposite of ludicrous. They have the cleverest of people plucked from around the world earning absolute fortunes to develop algorithms and programmes that will earn them money. You think it's beyond their ability to create the saTue, 02 Jun 2020 16:07:34 -0500if you want to go by the literal meaning of free speech than yes, but as said that is not what most take it to mean, it means to most to be allowed to have an opinion and say what you feel. Of course there is always the legal line most don't cross.ithttps://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31648965/jack-dorsey-twitter?post_id=559392623#559392623if you want to go by the literal meaning of free speech than yes, but as said that is not what most take it to mean, it means to most to be allowed to have an opinion and say what you feel. Of course there is always the legal line most don't cross.itTue, 02 Jun 2020 15:52:14 -0500It's not being pedantic, it's just proving the point. Go back to my post from 1.45. You often hear the likes of Young etc moaning about restrictions on free speech. It's a nice soundbite that's attractive to the ears. But he'd be the first to sue ifhttps://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31648965/jack-dorsey-twitter?post_id=559392533#559392533It's not being pedantic, it's just proving the point. Go back to my post from 1.45. You often hear the likes of Young etc moaning about restrictions on free speech. It's a nice soundbite that's attractive to the ears. But he'd be the first to sue ifTue, 02 Jun 2020 15:27:47 -0500