<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: 17% in London 5% in rest of the UK have had CVD-19</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31647377/17-in-london-5-in-rest-of-the-uk-have-had-cvd-19</link><description>According to a government sample.Yet only Brent in London features in the top 10 worst affected areas per confirmed cases in the UK per 100,000.  Can't get up to date death figures but it doesn't tally with that either.  So which figures are BS?</description><item><title>10%-20% is likely enough for herd immunity given the massive numbers that are immune without having the anti-bodies.Job done. Lets get the young healthy people back out immediately.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31647377/17-in-london-5-in-rest-of-the-uk-have-had-cvd-19?post_id=559345157#559345157</link><description>10%-20% is likely enough for herd immunity given the massive numbers that are immune without having the anti-bodies.Job done. Lets get the young healthy people back out immediately.</description><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2020 11:05:13 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Indeed Cider, next years census should produce some truly spectacular 'amendments' in official figures of how many are living in these islands...</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31647377/17-in-london-5-in-rest-of-the-uk-have-had-cvd-19?post_id=559345019#559345019</link><description>Indeed Cider, next years census should produce some truly spectacular 'amendments' in official figures of how many are living in these islands...</description><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2020 10:37:36 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Most of these ONS figures are being calculated using population data that is nearly a decade old, which will be well out of date. Not an insignificant issue in statistics.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31647377/17-in-london-5-in-rest-of-the-uk-have-had-cvd-19?post_id=559344881#559344881</link><description>Most of these ONS figures are being calculated using population data that is nearly a decade old, which will be well out of date. Not an insignificant issue in statistics.</description><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2020 10:05:44 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>There's no way the sampling is good enough to produce an accurate result. 1000 people, so what 250 in London? So 43 positive. Not sure how you cover all ages, races, gender, occupations, settings, prosperity, religions etc in a sample of 250. It's wo</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31647377/17-in-london-5-in-rest-of-the-uk-have-had-cvd-19?post_id=559344851#559344851</link><description>There's no way the sampling is good enough to produce an accurate result. 1000 people, so what 250 in London? So 43 positive. Not sure how you cover all ages, races, gender, occupations, settings, prosperity, religions etc in a sample of 250. It's wo</description><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2020 10:00:46 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Unless we suppose that London has a far lower death rate and much lower testing than the rest of the UK.  Not quite sure how that stacks up with the high number of BAME in London and their supposed higher death rates.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31647377/17-in-london-5-in-rest-of-the-uk-have-had-cvd-19?post_id=559344705#559344705</link><description>Unless we suppose that London has a far lower death rate and much lower testing than the rest of the UK.  Not quite sure how that stacks up with the high number of BAME in London and their supposed higher death rates.</description><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2020 09:26:25 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The government sample is all cases as of now.  If it was ages ago it might stack up, but it isn't.I don't doubt the figure in London is higher than the average of the rest of the country, but 78% of people in the UK live in urban areas.  The most pop</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31647377/17-in-london-5-in-rest-of-the-uk-have-had-cvd-19?post_id=559344691#559344691</link><description>The government sample is all cases as of now.  If it was ages ago it might stack up, but it isn't.I don't doubt the figure in London is higher than the average of the rest of the country, but 78% of people in the UK live in urban areas.  The most pop</description><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2020 09:23:52 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>most of the confirmed cases are recent that's why ...Brent was ages ago</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31647377/17-in-london-5-in-rest-of-the-uk-have-had-cvd-19?post_id=559343069#559343069</link><description>most of the confirmed cases are recent that's why ...Brent was ages ago</description><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 18:15:50 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I believe absolutely none of this . It's all absolute lies .</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31647377/17-in-london-5-in-rest-of-the-uk-have-had-cvd-19?post_id=559343061#559343061</link><description>I believe absolutely none of this . It's all absolute lies .</description><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 18:10:02 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>6 London boroughs in the top 20.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31647377/17-in-london-5-in-rest-of-the-uk-have-had-cvd-19?post_id=559342969#559342969</link><description>6 London boroughs in the top 20.</description><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 17:13:37 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Maybe they are doing a cover up and when it comes out will say it was due to "patient confidentiality"?Can't think where I've got the idea a poltician might do that.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31647377/17-in-london-5-in-rest-of-the-uk-have-had-cvd-19?post_id=559342901#559342901</link><description>Maybe they are doing a cover up and when it comes out will say it was due to "patient confidentiality"?Can't think where I've got the idea a poltician might do that.</description><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 16:52:10 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
